AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Breaking Alternative News discussion forum.  (rss)


Missile experts see Soviet parts in NKorean rocket




Topic started on 2-7-2009 @ 08:15 PM by MysterE


Missile experts see Soviet parts in NKorean rocket


www.breitbart.com

With concerns rising about a possible North Korean long-range missile test this weekend, two independent scientists say the regime may be using an old Soviet ballistic missile to boost a rocket capable of reaching the West Coast of the United States
(visit the link for the full news article)



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Breaking Alternative News topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 08:15 PM by MysterE


So, are they saying that the russians are supplying the North Koreans with missiles?

Using data and imagery from North Korea's April 4 launch, Postol and Wright calculated that the second stage of the North Korean rocket had the external dimensions, engine power and key features of an SS-N 6, a Soviet submarine-launched ballistic missile first deployed in 1968


The missile has been around for a while, so it's up in the air how they aquired them but the scarey part is..

it could modify the rocket into a two-stage missile that could reach Seattle, Wash., carrying a 900-kilogram warhead, or San Francisco carrying a 700-kilogram charge.

The design of a long-range missile tested by North Korea last April "represents a very significant advance in rocket technology," said Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Ted Postol and Union of Concerned Scientists'


Maybe we are underestinating the North Koreans capabilities. They do have the 3rd largest active army, and the largest army reserves in the world. See Here

-E-

www.breitbart.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 2-7-2009 by MysterE]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 08:51 PM by ELECTRICkoolaidZOMBIEtest


a lunatic despot with (partially) russian made weapons?
not too much of a shock there. it might mean the weapon is actually dangerous though.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 08:53 PM by phi1618


Its possible to buy old soviet military equipment. It also is quite easy to do, if you know the right people. Im not surprised that there are soviet parts since alot of old cold war weapons and devices are up for sale to the highest bidder.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 08:57 PM by gravitybender


Soooo... does this mean they may have more missiles than previously thought?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 09:01 PM by MysterE


Originally posted by gravitybender
Soooo... does this mean they may have more missiles than previously thought?


It means they have better missiles then we thought

represents a very significant advance in rocket technology


-E-

[edit on 2-7-2009 by MysterE]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 09:04 PM by UFOTECH


I think one of the driving forces behind Russian desires for deep missile cuts is so they have more old hardware to sell. It has been siting in their inventors for a couple of decades and now they want to liquidate it and put that money into something of more use. Selling it to space ventures and rouge nations is money in the bank for the Russians and if we go and blow them up then they will just sell some more. They lose nothing in the deal either way.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 09:18 PM by mrmonsoon


reply to post by UFOTECH



Not only that, but most likely they will sell to countries that will or will try to use it against the US.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 09:19 PM by Lazyninja


I hope that the media isn't going to use this info to encourage even more bad feeling toward Russia. When the Soviet union collapsed, all that kind of stuff was sold off. I hope the American media doesn't try and draw a link saying that Russia is complicit in the latest "Krazy Kim" antics.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 09:23 PM by MysterE


reply to post by Lazyninja



Thats funny you mention that, I was just reading this article and wondering something similar

Obama to tell Putin: Time to move past Cold War

-E-



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 09:32 PM by AgentX09


If true is bad news.Dont forget NK has chemical/bio weapons they can stick on those birds.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 09:46 PM by Nventual


America seems very cocky. Making fun of NK and their leader, like it is primary school.
They think every country praises them and respects them, but in reality NO countries respect them. I'm not surprised to hear that the rocket has Soviet parts, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that they have nuclear weapons hidden somewhere either.

Just like primary school America might be better off if they stop mocking NK and saying "it's okay, they wouldn't hurt me, they cant, we are the most powerful, yeeeeehaw!"



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 10:04 PM by Lazyninja


Originally posted by MysterE
Thats funny you mention that, I was just reading this article and wondering something similar

Obama to tell Putin: Time to move past Cold War

-E-


Interesting article. So cooperation is going to mean disarming nukes I guess.

The other day somebody said something which was very interesting, that America has never taking military action against a country which had nuclear weapons. You can really see why Russia does not want to be the first one to holster his gun in this Mexican standoff.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 10:09 PM by mrmonsoon


reply to post by Lazyninja



To be fair, to the best of my knowledge, Israel is the only nuclear armed country to be attacked in a serious way.

And more than one time, mind you, by more than one country.


For that matter, Russia and China have never directly attacked a nuclear armed country either.....

Just food for thought...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 10:15 PM by Lazyninja


Originally posted by mrmonsoon
For that matter, Russia and China have never directly attacked a nuclear armed country either.....



Yes and they haven't invaded any oil nations either



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 10:22 PM by UFOTECH


reply to post by Nventual



I was watching John Stewart yesterday and he had a guy on their that wrote a book on his work to help North Koreans get out and resettle in China or one of the other islands around there and he said they teach anti-Americanism to their school children.

He gave an example of a grade school math problem. "If you have a hand grenade and you kill to American's with it and another hand grenade and it blows up 1 Americans how many Americans have you killed?"

That was in a grade school text book. You might think Americans are cocky but the North Koreans are taught to hate us from early childhood. Which is worse behavior? I think teaching hate to children is far worse than people just being full of themselves.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 10:25 PM by princeofpeace


Is everyone on here an idiot? Soviet parts do not mean the rockets have the latest hardware from Russia and that Russia is supplying them. SOVIET means parts from the SOVIET empire. This means over 15 years ago. These can be bought by any country. There is nothing to read here that implies in any shape that Russia is helping NK with their missiles.

Please people read and THINK!!!

[edit on 2-7-2009 by princeofpeace]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 12:03 AM by wiseone11


the most important rule of war:

NEVER underestimate your enemy.

You will lose every time.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 08:55 AM by MysterE


Originally posted by princeofpeace
Is everyone on here an idiot? Soviet parts do not mean the rockets have the latest hardware from Russia and that Russia is supplying them. SOVIET means parts from the SOVIET empire. This means over 15 years ago. These can be bought by any country. There is nothing to read here that implies in any shape that Russia is helping NK with their missiles.

Please people read and THINK!!!



How funny that you would tell people to "read and THINK!!!" when you obviously havn't read the posts here. Allow me to quote it for you.


The missile has been around for a while, so it's up in the air how they aquired them but the scarey part is..

it could modify the rocket into a two-stage missile that could reach Seattle, Wash., carrying a 900-kilogram warhead, or San Francisco carrying a 700-kilogram charge.

The design of a long-range missile tested by North Korea last April "represents a very significant advance in rocket technology," said Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Ted Postol and Union of Concerned Scientists'

Maybe we are underestinating the North Koreans capabilities. They do have the 3rd largest active army, and the largest army reserves in the world. See Here



The point is not that the soviets may be supplying N Korea, it is that the N Korean capabilities may be better then we thought.

[edit on 3-7-2009 by MysterE]



   copyright & usage 

































































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.113 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.