It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Histopherness
Subject says it all. I find myself highly unlikely to believe most things that I read even in established news sites. I do find the reads interesting though.
Seriously people, the U.S. Government responsible for 9/11? I am sure hundreds of threats come in each and everyday, it would be rather foolish to think that the government would plan and execute such a tragic incident when if they really wanted a tragedy they could just cash in on something that was planned by someone else. Not that I believe that either, but at least more plausible.
UFO's in Area 51? Even IF a UFO ever was recovered and taken there, it wouldn't have stayed. Way too much interest. Any such craft and bodies would have been moved to a different site long since. Not that I believe that either but at least still more plausible. The refusal to even acknowledge Area 51; OK so they have acknowledged it recently (July 14th 2003), is just a better way to keep attention focused on an already compromised site.
Mass mind control? Do you even know how the brain works? Yes certain areas of the brain are responsible for hearing, site, etc. But memories and actually thoughts are put together in the brain differently from person to person. Any brainwashing, or mind control ever done is going to take several intense sessions tailored to the individual and no special "device" is going to do it in mass.
The only mass mind control we have is the media.
For a more open minded look, anyone know of a facility in or under Mt McKinley? There is this huge mountain; larger then Mt. Everest really just not as high above sea level, and it seems to me to be a perfect place to build a facility. Possibly a large bunker to provide for the president and important persons in the event of a nuclear attack back during the cold war; or before. Such a large mass of earth, in a park, well away from other bases known to whomever our enemies might be... well it would be a low priority target, and even if hit would provide ample protection. If no one has built one they should think about it.
Well, when you put it that way it stands well as an assertion. But I respectfully propose that it is not 'the government' per se, the 'accused' are those governing. When you take into account the nature of the act, the level of inquiry, and the efficacy of those mandated to investigate it, it is inevitable that a pressure-cooker of civic interest would arise. As long as you argue based on the meme that the government is the villain, you can overshadow the reality that 'governments' (especially nowadays) are nothing more than political and commercial cabals. I find it very easy to believe that such collusion for treasonous behavior and destructive self-interest is well within the scope of potential actions such groups could undertake.