reply to post by Jim Scott
Well... if MAD still exists and like you said and absolutely correct it stands for Mutual Assured Destruction... now... key word - MUTUAL. Se where
mutual comes in?
Its not OWAD... (one way assured destruction) its mutual... now if you think thats cool... well who am I to judge or to contradict someone that just
said "fine cause we have MAD) so that pretty much means wiping out Korea AND the US.
As for South Korea... no, they dont stand a chance. The only reason they're still there is because the US is there covering their asses and if they
move against SK they would have to deal with an all-out war, which they werent prepared until maybe now.
SK is not a nation of war... NK is. And that pretty much says it all about a "supposed" conflict between them. NK has born warriors... the mentality
and indoctrination of their army transcends everything learned in SK or even the US.
Like some said in other thread, they can withstand far more losses than the US can. Some gave the example of Russia... you think they care about
losing 1 million man defending their country... no. They wont... and they will keep defending it. Is the US willing to lose 1 million men? Or even
500k?
Strategically, NK is the living hell for anyone that gets in there. What are the US targets? Pyongyang? Sure they care... They will still get power
from "god knows where in their mountains up there which neither you, me or even the oh-so-powerful US army knows where they are. Its a harsh
terrain... if you wanna win a war if you have to go IN... on foot. And that is a problem is NK. The US army is not prepared to face the situations,
terrain advantages, difficulties that lie ahead and rend most of the "most powerful weapons" useless... M1 - useless in mountains for example, but
NK does have tanks specially designed for it. Air Force... well the US is used to "clean space" long range missiles and long range combat... well...
in NK, terrain topology suggests that they would be in advantage flying low in between the mounts in close range dog fights, which the US isnt quite
used to. So that rends all the "long range" capability of the US air force... join that with the constant training of the NK AF which you still
underestimate because they use migs. Now the migs have a tough maneuverability for the US to match. Plus the AF in NK seems to come out of nowhere
within seconds (see the case of the US spy plane which was kindly escorted out by 2 of them and the "SPY PLANE" didnt even see them coming... one
minute and they were side by side with it.
There was some simulations done in the 90s, I cant find the link I'm sorry, which gave NK victory over the US using both nuclear and conventional
war.
I dont mean to bash the US army or anything with this... I just mean to warn all the people that think the NK is a "piece of cake" and keep
underestimating NK because they dont have the latest technology when "old stuff" can still bring you down... and yes, the AK-47 still has quite a
punch and it is still stronger and more durable than the modern more sophisticated equivalents.
I just say... dont underestimate your enemy. The guy didnt stop the nuclear program... the US did nothing. They enrich plutonium, the US did nothing.
They have their leader saying he wants to eliminate the US from the face of the planet, the US did nothing... now seems like they have nuclear
capability of reaching half (and that I think is a "safe" call just to... well not create over-panic cause I would bet its a little more that
"half") and the US still does nothing... I'm glad the US Armed Forces dont underestimate their enemy like people in here do, cause they know what
they're up against and they know it will be ugly... so better stay quiet.
Saddam didnt do or say 1/10th of what NK did, had 1/100th of what NK has, and got bombed to oblivion in 2 or 3 consecutive nights.
think.