Treason by Any Other Name; the Treachery of Silence

reply to post by nenothtu


YES! Again Why I posted this thread – force debate of a subject hinted at, but never clearly discussed. The time is soon coming when each of us will have to choose which side of the line they will stand on.

It has far surpassed the point of return. In a day and age where those who would speak out against the dismissal of the Constitution. Have their own government label them as treasonists,or extremists. That's right our own government considers speaking out against their wrong doing,an act of treason.
So be it!!! I have been called worse by much better men!!
Sarge you will be hard pressed to find people who would take the time to read some of the acts comming out of Washington. Even if you did find a few who would read,they would probably lack the maturity to see the potential danger. As an adult with common sense,one must always size up a situation for potential hazards,to avoid harm to yourself or others.
These new acts that are proposed have extreme dangers built in. Read the Food Saftey Act 2009. Where it gives the FDA the right to do WARRENTLESS searches. Does that not send up a red flag? Are there those so wrapped up in the smiling faces and talking heads,that would refuse to admit the potential for extreme abuse?
Treachery of silence is far less damaging than treachery through misrepresentation,or ignorance.

reply to post by dooper


Don't forget those that had a passionate, vocal voice of reason like John Adams. One worth mentioning for having help the continental congress SEE that all their talk would do nothing and ACTION was to be taken and taken NOW.

reply to post by earthman4


That has to be the most naive statement I have ever heard.