Commercially available wireless electricity is here ..., page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 77 times


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 05:10 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by spacebot



But again, all of that needs advanced technology being developed today. For instance, birds can see these currents, we cannot.

We need detectors, we need processes, we need so much stuff.

What Tesla wanted to do was not affordable.

Like it or not, Even Tesla couldn't make a 2 story computer of the day into a laptop without the technology of today.


Yes, the world would be simpler and cheaper, but that's only to the outside observer. To the common observer, a computer seems pretty simple, but cut it open and you see the result of a century of research and development.

'Ol nikko was a great man, but he was not God. He was just as bound by technology as any other man.

His towers and ideas were not possible in his day in age.

Even his mercury gun is just now being looked into because the machines to built is now exist. It could not be built in the 40s.


I know we'd all love the fallout universe to be real and possible... at least before the war. But this is fiction. It is not possible.

The difficult cannot be made simple. It can just have the illusion of being simple. It is, however, not.


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 06:49 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by VitalOverdose



Probably the same stuff. Also, what's the range.



reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 06:52 PM by schrodingers dog
reply to post by VitalOverdose



From what I have read on their site the range depends on the desired hardware, bot they say they it can reach several meters, through walls, and around metal obstructions.

[edit on 2 Jul 2009 by schrodingers dog]


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 07:16 PM by VitalOverdose
reply to post by Gorman91



Its only a tiny distance of a few mm but it is making a connection though waterproof plastic.



reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 07:48 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by schrodingers dog



Well if this is from years ago, it should have gotten more publicity.


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 09:28 PM by ahnggk
reply to post by schrodingers dog



This is probably one of the 'worse' applications of Tesla Tech I can think of.

Proponents of this technology claim that energy density would be so low, you may need a large antenna to capture usable energy - I believe them.

Problem is, there's very little research on biological effects done. Even the microwaves off our our cellphones, no one is certain what harm it's capable of.

It may also be easy to weaponize or quickly convert a civilian transmitter, into something that can focus this energy to lethal doses and used to assassinate or torment individuals.


reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 03:10 AM by ahnggk
Originally posted by Bspiracy

That being asked, you don't have to be afraid of wireless energy, you just have to be afraid of the people who sell it to you.

b


It really doesn't matter who started wireless technology but this link might make you think twice.

www.rense.com...

After being exposed to electromagnetic fields that are typical for mobile phones, the cells showed a significant increase in single and double-strand DNA breaks. The damage could not always be repaired by the cell. DNA carries the genetic material of an organism and its different cells.

"There was remaining damage for future generation of cells," said project leader Franz Adlkofer.

This means the change had procreated. Mutated cells are seen as a possible cause of cancer.



reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 07:04 AM by postmeme
reply to post by schrodingers dog



I thought this was pretty old news...
Its probably efficiency, safety issues and the hard to accept paradigm of electricity going through the air which has stopped development. Oh and money.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^