It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dodadoom
reply to post by favouriteslave
You missed the point. Of course he can intervene!
Jesus had to endure every trial we have ever had to endure
and pass them sin free in order for him to die perfect in
exchange for the sin we commit daily!
Hows that for relevant?
Why would God intervene in that? He does actually love us.
Hence his patience with us. He could wipe his hand and start over.
Maybe he should.
Jesus' death is a perfect trade for ours.
Does any of this make any sense yet?
Geez I try to write simple so everyone gets it.
[edit on 5-7-2009 by dodadoom]
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by favouriteslave
Considering the fact you judge "religion" based on your experiences with Christianity which is but one of that particular classification.... Do you judge all of any ethnicity based on the actions of one? Do you judge ANY distinction of mankind based off the actions of one of it's members? If that is so *and no please don't answer* then racism must be perfectly logical to you.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by favouriteslave
Considering the fact you judge "religion" based on your experiences with Christianity which is but one of that particular classification.... Do you judge all of any ethnicity based on the actions of one? Do you judge ANY distinction of mankind based off the actions of one of it's members? If that is so *and no please don't answer* then racism must be perfectly logical to you.
Do you judge all of any ethnicity based on the actions of one? Do you judge ANY distinction of mankind based off the actions of one of it's members?
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by favouriteslave
Yet you consistantly refer to "religion" as if it all meant one thing. There were "religions" in which the only way to go to "Heaven" was to die in bloody battle after killing many yourself for example. What I have repeatedly tried to bring to your attention is that not all "religion" is Christianity, though that is obviously the one you have a problem with.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by wylekat
Hate to tell you not all Christians act like what most try to say they all act. Some are just as disgusted as you at the antics of their counterparts. But a great deal demonize even them with a generalization and generalizations particularly about such things as large groups of people are almost always false.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by favouriteslave
I can agree with that first part and I do. BUT, you say "religion" when in fact you are only talking about Christianity, does that not strike you as more than a little dishonest or at the very least denote someone who is missing something?
And earlier, you said a "evil" try cannot produce "good" fruit. Good and evil have no place in the natural world, which as I said earlier has no place in nature where one must die so another can survive. A creature dying *widely considered a evil thing* provides a meal for another creature who will then die later and provide a meal for still another. SO either nature is evil or the concept of "evil" is bullocks. Which kills the idea that a "evil" tree cannot produce "good" fruit. Or to the heart of your analogy that a "good" god cannot create "evil" things and so thusly does not exist.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by favouriteslave
Well considering the fact that it's been a very long time since he existed I find it hard to believe any of the quotes. Fish stories being an example why. And how opportunists twist things to their advantage when they can get away with it being another.
Heck I am not even sure he existed, but I do respect what I think to be his message, despite the distortion.
[edit on 5-7-2009 by Watcher-In-The-Shadows]