They were not "armed with search warrants" because they had no reason yet to request one.
Nor did they enter or search the house.
They were simply following a good lead...as the article clearly states.
No "warrantless search" just good police work. These guys have a very difficult and dangerous job. God bless them.
Originally posted by larphillips
Well, here we go... the precedent is being set and so far, no one is saying 'boo' about it. As the general public sees, and accepts this move, it will already be easier to expand this action to other "questionable" purchases. The slope is steep, and slippery indeed.
..... If this is all the justification they need to make a warrentless search, then the Constitution has now been rendered meaningless.
[edit on 7/1/2009 by JacKatMtn]


