It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PieKeeper
You are ignorant.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Originally posted by PieKeeper
You are ignorant.
Wow, it must have taken you all night to come up with that witty response.
Can I play also? No, you are ignorant. I'm sure you think anyone who disagrees with you is ignorant. Get a clue!
Originally posted by KarlG
It's not that you disagree
it's that you're mistaken
and you keep making fun of the evidence and the science that is placed before you.
Originally posted by PieKeeper
A population of flowers changing color to accommodate one species over another is actually remarkable. I don't know why so many of you don't get that.
Originally posted by Totakeke
reply to post by KarlG
I'd like to know why scientists subscribe to the whole "carbon dating" idea even though it's clearly flawed and has been proven to be flawed on countless occasions.
A critical assumption used in carbon-14 dating has to do with this ratio. It is assumed that the ratio of 14C to 12C in the atmosphere has always been the same as it is today (1 to 1 trillion). If this assumption is true, then the AMS 14C dating method is valid up to about 80,000 years. Beyond this number, the instruments scientists use would not be able to detect enough remaining 14C to be useful in age estimates. This is a critical assumption in the dating process. If this assumption is not true, then the method will give incorrect dates. What could cause this ratio to change? If the production rate of 14C in the atmosphere is not equal to the removal rate (mostly through decay), this ratio will change. In other words, the amount of 14C being produced in the atmosphere must equal the amount being removed to be in a steady state (also called “equilibrium”). If this is not true, the ratio of 14C to 12C is not a constant, which would make knowing the starting amount of 14C in a specimen difficult or impossible to accurately determine.
Originally posted by max.is.awake
Reply to post by WhatTheory
YEP. This is just one of many many many new threads popping up to disprove God when all it really does is prove He works through mysterious ways. It is obvious all living things evolve and adapt depending on the surroundings or changes in surroundings. Just another example of how God takes care of all living things even a moth. Excellent thread OP. Thank you. Bring us more proof of Gods wonders and miracles and love.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Ok, then show me the adaptations of one species changing into another.
Show me the evidence of one species evolving into another one.
Originally posted by Totakeke
But it is inaccurate, and they do use it. As hard as it is to believe scientists aren't so objective any more.