Are these really Michael Jackson's biological children???, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 12:51 AM by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by Aeons



Actually, my assessment had nothing to do with skin tone. I will concede to the chin, however. The pic of the kids is rather grainy. But I would also point out that the odds of three children not inheriting a darker skin tone are rather slim. I just heard on CNN that it is rumored that the first two were fathered by Debbie Rowe's boss (artificially).


reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 02:06 AM by Ace High
Nope not his biological kids.

www.tmz.com...

We've learned Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro -- outside the womb. Multiple sources deeply connected to the births tell us Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids.



reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 03:14 AM by Exv8densez
I don't know but the little guy Prince Michael does look like him in this picture!


Anyway MJ himself is not such an extreme "negro" as some try to make it seems. He just has a large nose and still not the largest you can find.


reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 04:08 AM by eniac
reply to post by TheLoony



A great entertainer contributes enormously to human culture, and directly makes people (fleetingly) happy with their work, and can also inspire us in all areas of our lives. Their contributions have strong intangible benefits to all of us.

But if you think all his music sucked (incl. Thriller and Off The Wall) then you just won't get it.



reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 06:08 PM by TheLoony
reply to post by eniac



There are nearly forty threads here about MJ. Yeah, we really need that many threads about his death.

Please, I do not need a lecture on how music affects us. I am a musician so I know. I happen to think MJ's "music' was largely junk and I do have some basis for what I think. I am a musician, not some flunky who just "knows what he likes" and I care not for fluff crap like he produced. A moonwalk, a glove and some jeri-curl do not make a musician to me.

When my favorite musicians start dying off, I will not be putting up threads about them as I see no reason to get worked up about someone dying. Why not start a thread about all those getting murdered in Iran, say, for a actual cause, instead of some musician who has contributed next to nothing to society and passes away.

We all will die, what makes MJ so damned special? As far as this particular thread, the children, whether his or not, have more money than you, I and probably a thousand others on this forum will never see in our lifetime so this thread, IMO, is totally and completely unnecessary.

If you cannot look around and see all the crap that is going on, and still think MJ's death is a big thing, then I pity you. I really do. Yes, it is sad when a person dies, but that does not mean we need to be inundated with worthless threads about one person who mattered so little in the grand scheme of things.


reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 06:20 PM by Beefcake
Of course they aren't his kids he is black and they are white. Not only that but one of them is friggin blonde. Its sad when as a society we can no longer think for ourselves anymore and literally have no common sense left.

For those that are still in denial despite the biological improbability of both of his children being white. Here is recent article from the NEW YORK POST

His Dermatologist is the father!!!!!

www.nypost.com...">Michael Jackson's Dermatoligist is biological father of his children



A Los Angeles dermatologist who treated Michael Jackson for years is the biological father of Jacko's son and daughter, according to a bombshell new report. Us Weekly magazine reports in its upcoming issue, which hits newsstands tomorrow, that Dr. Arnold Klein is the man who fathered Prince and Paris.




The kid's mother, Debbie Rowe, once worked for Klein. "He is the dad," a Jackson insider said of Klein. "He and Debbie signed an agreement saying they would never reveal the truth."


I absolutely can't stand idiocy and anyone who think these are MJ's Biological kids needs a brain transplant. Of course he raised them and he is the father but "Biological" he is not.


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 01:07 AM by Exv8densez
reply to post by Beefcake


Not only that but how outrageous that three adults would accept to do such a messed up deceitful thing.

Now those poor children are going to be the targets of unscrupulous relentless scrutiny. It should not be just OK that MJ is not the biological father.


reply posted on 19-10-2011 @ 03:41 AM by ignant
apparently the media released new photo's of MJ's ex's son confirming vitiligo visually.

so, that confirms Prince (Prince Jackson) has vitiligo, but not that MJ is his biological father to begin with.



since Prince's mother is nordic, it's likely the sperm donor was mediterranean, latinamerican, or brazilian, judging by Prince's otherwise profuse tanning.

edit on 19-10-2011 by ignant because: (no reason given)

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 16 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 12 days ago with 122 member flags
STOP....Take a STEP BACK....and look at the BIG PICTURE!!
  Posted 18 days ago with 115 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 16 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 14 days ago with 85 member flags