reply to post by tezzajw
Hearsay must have a different definition in Australia.
Interviews and statements made by the people involved with the clean up, is not hearsay.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by ATH911
I believe a large section of it ended up in that crater when it crashed. Whether it was 40...50...or 60 percent of the wreckage (or more) I do not know, I wasnt there to dig it out. I have to rely on the reports from the people that were.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by tezzajw
Interviews and statements made by the people involved with the clean up, is not hearsay.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by tezzajw
Interviews and statements made by the people involved with the clean up, is not hearsay.
Officials are saying "most" of Flight 93 did. They are even having the ambassadors at the Flight 93 memorial giving tourists the specific about of 80% recovered out of the ground.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999Thanks for your refusal to post the reports, Swampfox.
reply to post by tezzajw
You seem to be a diligent researcher at times, I am sure you can find the links all by yourself tonight.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by tezzajw
Based on your past history of not accepting government statements or media reports, why should I bother?
I am STILL waiting for you to state what an acceptable source is anyway...
I'd like to read the reports that convinced you. If you don't want to play nice and share, that's up to you. It appears that you don't want any one else questioning your beliefs, as you're not prepared to show the source links to the reports.