Blacklisted News has this Commentary-Analysis write up on the June 2009
WHICH PATH TO PERSIA?
Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran
The document has 24 instances of the word provocation...
All this hinting at another false-flag attack underway and prepping the international community for a future invasion of Iran is becoming
increasingly serious as the warmongering is being stepped up. This is the time to fix our eyes upon these globalists and their think tanks. If their
blatant arrogance permits them to openly publish their bloodthirsty musings, we should be vigilant enough to pass this knowledge around lest we have
another 9/11 on our hands.
In a recent policy paper published by the influential Brookings Institute, the authors propose almost anything to guarantee dominance of Persia by
the new world order, including bribery, lying, cheating and mass murdering by an all-out military assault of Iran. The paper ‘Which path to Persia:
Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran’ is just one of many recent and not so recent examples of the firm intent of the globalists to
engage Iran militarily and acquire its natural resources in the same effort. www.blacklistednews.com...
The group of authors- a cozy little convergence of globalists- contemplate four separate options on ‘how to deal with Iran’ in the cold
bureaucratic language that poses as scientific but is really nothing more than the intelligent musings of a calculating psychopath.
Following the directive or tendency of using false flags, they openly speculate about the possibility of ‘provocation’
to escalate the
it is not impossible that Tehran might take some action that would justify an American invasion. And it is certainly the case that if Washington
sought such a provocation, it could take actions that might make it more likely that Tehran would do so (although being too obvious about this
could nullify the provocation). However, since it would be up to Iran to make the provocation move (…), the United States would never
know for sure when it would get the requisite Iranian provocation. In fact, it might never come at all.’
That would be dissapointing...so they explore on page 66...
Brookings Publication PDF
‘With provocation, the international diplomatic and domestic political requirements of an invasion would be mitigated, and the more
outrageous the Iranian provocation (and the less that the United States is seen to be goading Iran), the more these challenges would be
diminished. In the absence of a sufficiently horrific provocation, meeting these requirements would be daunting.’
I wonder if these guys are paid to sit around and write this stuff up without sufficient reason?
Most likely, not. There is something beyond the obvious, and the obvious is quite dark. How many times can they get away with this sort of thing?
[edit on 30-6-2009 by burntheships]