Young people to older adults, "We know better, leave us alone!" Survey, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 09:30 PM by WolfofWar
reply to post by OldThinker



Depends on who it is. There are so many variables to take into account. Intelligence of the individual, their education, their general level of apathy, the events of their lives, etc.

I'd say a 21 year old Albert Einstein is smarter then a 65 year old David Letterman. (though a 65 year old David Letterman may be funnier then a 21 year-old Albert Einstein.)

The same problem I have with your question is the same issue I have with ageism in general. You are asking if all 25 year olds are wiser then 65 year olds. It's a generalization and a stereotype. Every individual is shaped differently through these factors, and as such these age based generalizations are worthless.

I'll throw a question back at you. A 65 year old woman is contacted by a 25 year old scam artist who tells her she won a new car, and all she has to do is send 350 dollars for the shipping costs to collect it.

Now who's wiser or smarter? the 65 year old woman or the 25 year old scam artist?


reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 09:34 PM by Deus est mortuus
reply to post by OldThinker



The most recent generations are the only generations to grow in a truly technological world with free flow of information and ideas. It is simply the evolution of society... lol. I agree with you though, the kids do ignore a lot of wisdom, but they learn in their own way.


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 04:51 AM by GradyPhilpott
reply to post by EnlightenUp



I said, "tried and true." You said, tried and failed."

That's a straw man argument if I ever saw one.


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 01:00 PM by EnlightenUp
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
reply to
post by EnlightenUp



I said, "tried and true." You said, tried and failed."

That's a straw man argument if I ever saw one.


I know what you said. I know what I said. What was true before got us here. What seemed to work before may not work now. Transmute the circle into a spiral.


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 09:34 PM by OldThinker
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
reply to
post by EnlightenUp



I said, "tried and true." You said, tried and failed."

That's a straw man argument if I ever saw one.



What "straw man" argument are you two discussing...


May I help?

OT "tried and True" yet confused.... still my thread, right?

OT out....


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 09:58 PM by Bunken Drum
Originally posted by EnlightenUp
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott reply to post by EnlightenUp
I said, "tried and true." You said, tried and failed." That's a straw man argument if I ever saw one.
I know what you said. I know what I said. What was true before got us here. What seemed to work before may not work now. Transmute the circle into a spiral.
Ofcourse what was considered "tried & true" before may well have been, like a great deal of what is often refered to as 'common sense', either somebody else's agenda, pure prejudice, or some of both. Thus being more accurately described as 'repeated & false'.



reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 11:45 PM by Gorman91
I foresaw this years ago in High school.

The new generation, my generation, are conservative secularists to my best notion.

People who believe in conservative values, but have no care for religion and do not see it as important. Most of us believe in an afterlife and God, we just see no point in organized religion.

And most of us understand that gay marriage is just as valid as regular marriage, because love is love. They can't have kids, that's it.

You might be thinking "doesn't gay marriage go against conservative views?"

No. It does not. It goes perfectly together. We have no care for the actions of others in their own bed. Most do not like the gay parades, and I cannot understand sexual patriotism, but why on Earth would I deny the right to marriage to 2 people who love each other?

Facebook polls, where the youth hangs out, really goes a long way to show this.

Some issues about this generation you should know about:
A lot of this generation seems to be against abortion more so now.
We're still split on the origin of man, surprisingly, but most stick with evolution or God + evolution.

F the government. We do not like it.

The current economy is not solvable with massive money spendings.

War is not good for anything but emergencies.

World unions are good so long as the constitution still rules our land.

Sorry old folks, but you're just not right and I don't have a whole lot of respect for the baby boomer generation. No disrespect, but you're just wrong on so many things.


[edit on 5-7-2009 by Gorman91]


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 01:42 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by mcguyvermanolo



No it's not divide and conquer. That's silly.

This is the simple fact that the old generation is wrong and backwards and the newer generation is growing more progressive and liberal.

That's what's happening.

If they wanted to divide and conquer, I doubt it would take 20 years.

[edit on 7-7-2009 by Gorman91]
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why my mind is closing towards Capitalism
  Posted 8 days ago with 78 member flags
Hippy Do-Gooders have Destroyed the World
  Posted 9 days ago with 23 member flags
Facts About Socialism
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags
Are Liberals REALLY More Intelligent Than Conservatives?
  Posted 6 days ago with 18 member flags
The "Occupy are Socialists," Megathread
  Posted 9 days ago with 8 member flags
Unpopular Opinions: Say NO to Human Rights
  Posted 4 days ago with 7 member flags
This is what needs to happen: REVOLUTION!
  Posted 12 days ago with 5 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 5 days ago with 3 member flags