reply to post by Apollumi
I try to keep an open mind. To me it sounds more like he is talking about finding the center of the galaxy, and the black hole at the center than a
brown drawf orbiting.
The directions he is giving are directions towards the black hole.
This is the kind of thing that would be looked for back in the early 80's as well.
And, we are actually coming closer to the center of the galaxy than we ever do right now. That is not the galactic plane, we are far away from that.
It's from the center of the galaxy. But we are of course still actually really far away from it, it's just as close as we get.
As the black hole does keep the sun in orbit around it, I wonder if perhaps it would make sense that in general it keeps a pull on the planets and
such as well, and that would account for the parts they can't figure out with probes gaining speeds and such.
The black hole at the center of the galaxy is not doubt a "2nd sun" for us, as we rotate around it. It is also a dark sun.
If there is a brown dwarf that orbits the sun, then it is still subject to keplers laws. It's not so much the idea of such an object that I
disagree with. It's what everyone claims about, and the time frame of 2012 etc that I think is for sure wrong. So I try to remain open.
I don't think I buy the "rings" thing at all. I gave it a hmmm at first. But if it's true then why do the planets, and this object itself have
such elliptical orbits? But yet, we get hit by this ring and it causes a tsunami?
And what he says about the shifts and such and the tsunami's. He is acting like it would just happen instantly or something, rather than
gradually. It's not like it's just going to all of a sudden turn on it's gravity.
Going to listen to the rest of it.
