It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ozzraven
I just leave this here:
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
Originally posted by ozzraven
¿Why the disciples will be martyrs of a big lie?
Originally posted by ozzraven
The historical Jesus needs not only first hand accounts but common sense over the human behavior too.
Originally posted by ozzraven
If we use your logic, then anyone would be saying:
"show me first hand accounts of people telling how jesus was a fabricated tale", contemporary witnesses . I wont read any other claim !.
Originally posted by texastig
Gary Habermas - "Historicity of Resurrection 1 of 11 Apologetics".
www.youtube.com...
[edit on 6/15/2010 by texastig]
Originally posted by Kapyong
Originally posted by texastig
Gary Habermas - "Historicity of Resurrection 1 of 11 Apologetics".
www.youtube.com...
[edit on 6/15/2010 by texastig]
This web page proves you wrong :
www.google.com
Kap
Originally posted by texastig
You don't need someone who hasn't met Jesus to prove that somebody existed, because if that was a requirement, then we would have to deny all of history.
Originally posted by ISHAMAGI
The OP is right, get over it!
No real evidence for a historical Jesus exists, he is not alone in this belief.
I have never seen his argument disproved anywhere, that is not calling anyone a liar or fool.
Besides I thought it was all about faith anyway?
Get some and don't worry about the facts.
Did you watch the 11 part series?
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
That's not how it works. You have to bring the relevant points from the series to this discussion. Telling people to go watch a 2-hour video is not debating.
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
Besides, from what I can see Kapyong has already covered most of Habermas's points in this thread.
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
Is there a claim in particular that you want to bring up without wasting 2 hours of everyone's time?
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
That's not how it works. You have to bring the relevant points from the series to this discussion. Telling people to go watch a 2-hour video is not debating.
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
Besides, from what I can see Kapyong has already covered most of Habermas's points in this thread.
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
Is there a claim in particular that you want to bring up without wasting 2 hours of everyone's time?
Originally posted by texastig
Paul met the eyewitnesses of Jesus.
Gal 1:18
Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days.
Originally posted by texastig
Gal 1:19 But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord's brother.
Originally posted by texastig
Did you watch the 11 part series?
Originally posted by Kapyong
That is NOT Paul saying :
"I met Peter the eye-witness of Jesus" at all.
You are just ASSUMING what you are trying to prove - that there WAS an eye-witness.
Originally posted by Kapyong
But Paul makes it clear that Peter was NOT an eye-witness to a historical Jesus - he says Peter had a VISION of Jesus just like he did. Paul says he is just as much an apostle as Paul - they both had visions, that's all.
Originally posted by Kapyong
This is NOT have a claim to have met someone who personally met Jesus.
It's merely a claim to have met someone - who is LATER claimed to have met Jesus in a FORGED letter.
Originally posted by Kapyong
The Lord's Brother is a TITLE.
Many NT people are called brothers in the Lord etc.
Originally posted by Kapyong
This is NOT a claim to have met someone who met a historical Jesus at all.
NONE of you can come up with ONE clear example of anyone saying they met Jesus, or anyone who did.
Originally posted by Kapyong
No.
If YOU think it has some evidence, then WHY are you so reluctant to post it?
A youtube video is NOT evidence.
Originally posted by Kapyong
If YOU think there is evidence, then POST it here in text like we all do.
Your refusal to do so tells everyone here it's the same-old same-old.
If you had anything that proved me wrong you be falling over yourself to post it here to show I was wrong.
But no -
all we ever get is the same crap :
I'm right - and the evidence is somewhere else, and I won't post it....
Originally posted by Movhisattva
Baird T. Spalding claimed to have met Jesus and travelled with him through the Himalayas at the end of the nineteenth century, along with a bunch of other enlightened beings.
He wrote 'Life and teachings of the masters of the far east' in the first part of the twentieth century, describing his experiences during an 'American scientific expedition' to India and Tibet.
But I guess this isn't the kind of 'authentic claim' you are looking for
Furthermore I've got no opinion concerning this topic, just pointing to an extraordinary claim from a different angle. For which there's no western scientific evidence to back it up.
Peace.
[edit on 6/7/10 by Movhisattva]
is it me or do people forget about Pontius Pilate?
if i missed his name in this thread, forgive me!
he was real and documented, no?
or is his role in jesus life a "story" also? is it me or do people forget about Pontius Pilate?