Has Capitalism failed or are people just too stupid to handle it these days?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 07:09 PM by grapesofraft
reply to post by ELECTRICkoolaidZOMBIEtest



LOL, great answer. Stupidity does usually measure pretty high on the list of reasons things go bad in the world. Maybe we do need the government to take care of us and wipe our butts after all.



reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 07:16 PM by Zosynspiracy
First off Americans have been lied to for a long time. I can't tell you the last time we actually had a capitalistic market in this country. But what he have now is far from it. We have state corporatism. Corporate America has been in bed with government for atleast 50 years. I'd say more than any other factor i.e. greed, stupidity is the fact that government has grown exponentially in the last 50 years. It's nuts! People want to point to our economic problems as a result of unfettered capitalism. Bull#.

But to answer your question from a philosophical standpoint, with capitalism is akin to liberty. With both come individual responsibility, accountability, and honesty. You need all of these things in order to have individual liberty. You also need all of these things to have economic liberty as well. I think as a whole people are just more greedy, less honest, less responsible, less informed, etc. People want to take all the risks of making money without accepting the consequences of those risks if they don't work in their favor. Well that's where the government comes in. Anyways, I could go on and on about this subject.

Bottomline is government is the biggest problem right now to a free and fair capitalistic market. But what the hell do you expect from a government that is controlled by the corrupt Federal Reserve. The people's ability to create their money is corrupted so why is it so hard to believe that our economy is corrupted as well. Like I said capitalism hasn't failed, we haven't had it for a LONG time.


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 07:19 PM by badmedia
reply to post by Zosynspiracy



This was my reply as well. We don't have a capitalistic market and haven't in a long time. Never in my lifetime.


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 07:20 PM by grapesofraft
reply to post by Zosynspiracy



A star for you and a great point. There is way too much interference by government in the free enterprise system. That is why we would all be much better off with a much smaller and less intrusive government. It is pretty bad when the Communist Chinese can do a better job of supporting Capitalism than the USA.


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 07:24 PM by grapesofraft
reply to post by JaxonRoberts



Very good point Jaxon. I do see a bit of a problem with this. Actually, I think this is driven by the greed of the investors in the corps. They keep demanding revenue growth, and to do that once you hit a certain size then you have to acquire other companies to drive that growth.


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 07:25 PM by grapesofraft
reply to post by The Killah29



The world is not owned by 14-15 people. Do you not own a car or house or something?


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 07:29 PM by grapesofraft
reply to post by Kaytagg



LOL, I totally agree that people for whatever reason have become too stupid and/or too irresponsible to handle capitalism or even freedom for that matter. How did it get this way?


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 07:30 PM by tamusan
reply to post by grapesofraft



Working people are waking up and realizing that there are 3 kinds of people in capitalism;

1. Those at the top.
2. Those who do all the work.
3. Those who don't do anything.

Group 1 and 3 leech all the reward of capitalsim from group 2.


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 07:30 PM by JaxonRoberts
reply to post by grapesofraft




While this is very good for the Corporation, it is very bad for the consumer. You then have to factor in the ability to lobby lawmakers which they would not have if they were limited in size. We don't need to dump capitalism, but we do need to limit the size of Corporations. Look at the break up of ATT in the 80's. They were the largest corporation in the world, and once they were broken up, several companies were then allowed to compete for the consumer's business. Before this breakup, Sprint, Verizon, etc. did not and could not exist.


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 07:35 PM by grapesofraft
reply to post by JaxonRoberts



Well I see your point but I also remember that ATT was a government allowed monopoly and that this was the biggest problem. Really if you look at the new ATT it is not that much smaller, but it is not a government protected monopoly.

But I do kind of agree that it wouldnt be a bad thing to limit the size of corps or I for sure agree that we shouldnt bail them out if they fail, no matter how painful that may be.


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 07:45 PM by JayinAR
reply to post by grapesofraft



Standards in education have been lowered by the Government.

It has been 150+ years since the liberal arts was removed from public education.
The latest lowering was the No Child Left Behind bill.

It is an orchestrated event.
And why not? America already has everything, right? No need for the people to work hard when everything they need is provided free of charge.

Look around at the average American. It is truly sickening the level of idiocy displayed in this country. I go from being frustrated to downright infuriated at it.

People are more caught up on the fact that a Pop Icon has died than the fact that the Government is ramrodding the most destructive bill to our personal liberty to ever be proposed through the Senate as we speak.
Not that it matters much, the majority of Americans are too stupid to realize that the bill is destructive in the first place.
Nay, they actually applaud it.

Oh well, in the end, people reap what they sow. That goes for the people to unwilling to govern themselves and the evil scum bastards who are charged to do it for them... Responsibly and for their benefit.



[edit on 29-6-2009 by JayinAR]


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 07:51 PM by grapesofraft
reply to post by JayinAR



Jay you cannot blame the government if you or your children fail to get a good education. Nobody is stopping you from teaching yourself or your children other things in your spare time. You can even homeschool them if you like. The government offers free education and you get what you pay for. It is important to not look to the government as the end all be all to all of lifes needs.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why my mind is closing towards Capitalism
  Posted 9 days ago with 78 member flags
Hippy Do-Gooders have Destroyed the World
  Posted 10 days ago with 23 member flags
Facts About Socialism
  Posted 2 days ago with 23 member flags
Are Liberals REALLY More Intelligent Than Conservatives?
  Posted 6 days ago with 18 member flags
The "Occupy are Socialists," Megathread
  Posted 10 days ago with 8 member flags
Unpopular Opinions: Say NO to Human Rights
  Posted 5 days ago with 7 member flags
This is what needs to happen: REVOLUTION!
  Posted 13 days ago with 5 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 6 days ago with 3 member flags