posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 07:51 PM
I wouldn't call this the "truth" on Indrid Cold. Nothing new was presented in evidence. Just the old report I have heard earlier.
I've always believed Derenberger's story. Now whether or not the object and the man he saw actually were extraterrestrial remains to be seen, but I
do think he reported truthfully what he saw and what was communicated to him. I don't think Derenberger ever profited from this report in any way.
Just an average man reporting on a paranormal experience as many others have.
If this Indrid Cold was an ET, I don't think I'll ever understand why they bother to communicate to humans on an individual basis yet neglect to
mass communicate such seemingly benign intent. I'm sure they have their reasons if they're doing this, but I doubt any excuse they come up with
could satisfy me.
In my opinion, you are not benign in intent if you act secretively and perhaps (and likely) subversively for decades (or perhaps centuries or
[edit on 29-6-2009 by Frith]