Originally posted by weedwhacker
4) Could a single celled life form begin by happenstance from ammonia, methane and water?
"questions" 1 thru 3 are fallacious and ridiculous, and you know it!!!
Weed, weed weed,, I'm only going to say this once, Please refrain from offering your distractions and calls to emotionalism your ad-hom opinions are
irrelevant. You thinking they are ridiculous or that they are nonsense is an argument for another thread and in no way does THIS discussion benefit
from your opinions which have nothing to do with the four questions I asked.
They MAY seem fallacious they may even seem like nonsense and it may even look like I'm talking about a biogenesis but if you would hold your
presumptuous "gotcha!'s" to yourself until the exercise has run its course, then perhaps you would understand my taking such a serious resolve in
adding anyone that uses such tactics be relegated to my ignore list.
The questions given were not about you but you may participate and I'll be more than happy to furnish you with the cognition explosion that usually
hits like a punch line in a joke only this kind doesn't manifest the same biochemical reactions release of substance P and the endorphin rush as a
beneficial side effect of laughter. No this kind usual has the individual feeling like he just unclogged his brain and says " aaah yeah!"
I also want to congratulate you weed, on your uncanny ability to correctly deduce that an elephant jumping over the moon is in fact Ridiculous. How
does he do it everyone! Most of us would be buried in books all night to figure that one out. Bravo! Did it ever occur to you that their may still
be a perfectly good reason for its absurd presence in my list?
#4 is a question about a biogenesis, NOT evolution!!!!
:
Weed, why is it you seem to be acting like Sherlock Holmes and just realized you caught me in something spurious and now you're about to BUST the
case wide open? First you have no idea what my question is "about" moreover is this common practice among hobby scientists we put the smack down on
questions regarding chemistry just in case it gets too close to that "OFF LIMITS ZONE called a biogenesis?
Since we know very little about a biogenesis, who are you to tell me there is absolutely no possibility there was anything evolutionary happening
there? You see the problem is that you assume you are right and that you know what I am thinking.
My question was not an introduction to an argument about a biogenesis.
But, here is [I]why your question #4 is phrased incorrectly
No it was not phrased incorrectly weed, you only think that because it is easier for you to think you are right and I made a mistake about my alleged
intro to abiogenist. It never occurred to you that the reason you think it is phrased wrong regarding abiogenists, is because YOU'RE wrong.
MY question was NOT about introducing the a biogenesis as the dirty creationist trick, which is why YOU think I phrased it wrong.
,
even in addition to being off topic:
Seeing that you have been completely wrong about everything in my post, why would you think it is off topic in light of my making it clear to you your
assumptions were ehh pre-mature.
Single-celled organisms didn't just appear, fully formed, from "ammonia, methane and water" as you snorted!
That was not my question sans the snort. Again attempting to raise the temperature in here weed? Try staying at cause and not at effect, and I will
assure you I will do the same for you. Weed any more wisecracks or sarcastic remarks, referring to spaghetti monsters or flying teapots, we will
have nothing to share ever again. I will treat you with respect and if I think I have any questions rather than be presumptuous I will ask you for
clarity and not jump to conclusions adding labels of whose "trick" or nonsense I think it might be. You don't know me; I am not like any
creationist you have gotten away with this before.
If you are going to accuse me of being off topic about a biogenesis, why is it any less an infraction for you to go right ahead and introduce a video
about it as my accomplice?. If you do not want to talk about a biogenesis weed, I only hope that video has nothing to do with it then. Because if
it does, then you are introducing that into the discussion
[edit on 30-6-2009 by DASFEX]
[edit on 30-6-2009 by DASFEX]