I don't know, but I can be reasonably assured that if I left a sink full of dirty dishes in dish water for upwards of six months (or even 600 million
years) the only thing it would spawn would be an unbearable stench.
The thought of a random pool of chemicals that can be found in a toy chemistry set producing anything relatively close to me in time is pretty
far-fetched. And yes I do know that the argument is various amino acids and other compounds, but it is all chemistry after all if you take it to base
components.
Either way, I do not think "life" has been created in any lab without some sort of outside contamination or influence as of yet. And I think that
Darwin also shared those views as well. Just that years of misinterpretation has brought about the idea of absolute evolution. Which is quite
different than Darwin's Theory of successful mutations of a species that produced reproducible offspring that dominated (or struck a balance) with
competition is why we have a diverse catalog of flora and fauna.


. What more motivation do you need to become a scientist than to name the birth of creation after yourself?
(In actuality it would probably
never be named after its discoverer, baring extraordinary circumstances)
