Ok seekerof... you gave me a good lead. Thank you. I see what you were saying about that Husseini character and his ties with hitler. (edit: my
opinions are in bold italic when embedded within website excerpts)
"3. Hitler and the Mufti
And what about Islam, the third monotheistic religion? While Hitler ranted against Christianity and Judaism, expressing "a violent feeling of anger
at the idea that some Germans were able to be taken in by theological doctrines devoid of any depth," he contrasted these hated teachings with
"those of Confucius, of Buddha and of Mohammed" which provided spiritual "sustenance". (Angeberts, p.246) In this context, Hitler's friendship
with Haj Amin al Husseini, Mufti of Jerusalem - which included asylum in 1941, the honorary rank of SS Major and an acceptable racial "genealogy" -
can be understood as more a sign of respect than political expedience.
There were even cases of Nazis relocating to Arab countries and converting
to Islam. (p.275-276 note 14) In this opinion, Hitler had the backing of the Thule Society, whose founder Sebottendorf praised Islam for having a
"vitality greater than that of Christianity" which flowed "from a torrent which nourished everything" - that same "thread of lost knowledge"
which was the goal of the Nazi quest. (Angeberts, p.165-166) [This raises other ideas for why Hitler's Mein Kampf is so popular among some Moslems;
besides the expected political admiration for brute force, there may also be a consensus of spiritual worldviews.] "
more similar hatred from this husseini character (what a bad guy you found here, seeker! )
"During WWII, Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Moslem Mufti of Jerusalem (uncle of today's Palestinian Authority Minister of Jerusalem Affairs, Faisal
Husseini), met with Adolph Hitler to organize the extermination of the Jewish populations of the Middle East. Yasser Arafat is also related to this
family by his mother."
Needless to say, I have seen similar texts describing a similar relationship with Yassir Arafat. To the average layman, this seems like some
kind of antisemitic conspiracy, and I can understand that. Really, I can. I would be thinking along the same lines had I not been aware of some of the
information available in terms of genetic coordination of the powers that be. Believe me, it's nothing of the antisemtic sort. It's 'all in the
family'. Allow me to explain.
On one side of the dispute, you have the progenitors of the countries who would forcibly exile people, particularly those of Jewish genealogy and
faith, out of their homes. On the other, you have people who are desparately trying to maintain their grasp on the world by 'keeping a tough grip on
the reigns'. Metaphorically speaking, I mean that they will engage any means necessary to force their agenda of control upon the world and have been
doing so for centuries. Idealogically, these two otherwise separate factions are one and the same.
Some excerpts from a site I just found that explains this in better detail:
"Today, the Vatican maintains its own State Department and an influential albeit non-voting presence in the United Nations. Reports such as the
following confirm current Vatican negotiations to regain control of the Holy Land. Although it must now work through diplomatic channels, the second
Vatican conquest of the Holy Land will be heralded as another spiritual mandate to reestablish the Holy Roman Empire. "The Vatican's Jerusalem
Agenda" by Israeli journalist, Barry Chamish, inquired: "Did Shimon Peres make a deal with the Vatican?" Consider the evidence:
* On Sept. 10, '93, just three days before the signing of the Declaration of Principles in Washington, the Italian news magazine La Stampa reported
that part of the peace deal was an unwritten understanding that the Vatican would receive political authority over the Old City of Jerusalem by the
end of the millenium. The newspaper reported that Shimon Peres had promised the pope to hand over the holy sites of Jerusalem the previous May and
that Arafat had accepted the agreement.
* In March '94, the Israeli newsmagazine Shishi published an interview with Mark Halter, a French intellectual and close friend of Shimon Peres.
He said he delivered a letter from Peres to the Pope the previous May, within which Peres offered the Vatican hegemony over the Old City of Jerusalem.
The article detailed Peres's offer which essentially turned Jerusalem into an international city overseen by the Holy See.
* In March '95, the radio station Arutz Sheva announced that it had seen a cable sent by the Israeli Embassy in Rome to the Foreign Ministry in
Jerusalem outlining the handover of the Old City of Jerusalem to the Vatican. Two days later Haaretz published the cable on its front page.
The Foreign Ministry explained that the cable was genuine but someone had whited out the word "not." ie We will not transfer authority to the
Vatican. Incredibly, numerous Bnei Brak rabbis who had cancelled Passover meetings with Peres over the issue of the cable accepted the explanation and
reinvited him to their homes.
The Foreign Ministry's Legal Affairs Spokesperson, Esther Samilag, publicly complained about "various capitulations" to the Vatican. She was
immediately transferred to a post at the Israeli Embassy in Katmandu, Nepal.
MK Avraham Shapira announced in the Knesset that he had information that all Vatican property in Jerusalem was to become tax exempt and that large
tracts of real estate on Mount Zion were given to the pope in perpetuity.
Jerusalem's late Deputy Mayor Shmuel Meir announced that he had received "information that properties promised to the Vatican would be granted
Beilin was forced to answer the accusations. He admitted, 'Included in the Vatican Agreement is the issue of papal properties in Israel that will
be resolved by a committee of experts that has already been formed.' If so, this committee has not since released any proof of its existence. "
Even more informative is what's to come next, although its from a modern perspective of the past:
"Concurrent with the Vatican's negotiations for authority over the Old City of Jerusalem, others who would also establish a claim to Jerusalem's
Holy Places have a covetous eye on the Holy Land. The Prieuré de Sion appears to be the hierarchy of a vast network of organizations which make up a
Secret Brotherhood that covers the globe.
"There are a great many secret societies in operation, [Charles] Nodier declares. But there is one, he adds, that takes precedence over all others,
that in fact presides over all others. According to Nodier this 'supreme' secret society is called the Philadelphes. At the same time, however, he
speaks of 'the oath which forbids me to make them known under their social name. Nevertheless there is a hint of [the Prieuré de] Sion..." - 31:152
According to Rosicrucian book Holy Blood, Holy Grail, this august body has maintained a low profile from its inception and remains behind the scenes
orchestrating critical events in Western history.
"The Prieuré de Sion exists today and is still operative. It is influential and plays a role in high-level international affairs as well as in the
domestic affairs of certain European countries..." (3)
The Prieuré de Sion claims to be the Guardians of the Holy Grail--the sacred icon of the Merovingian bloodline which blasphemously purports to be the
bloodline of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene. However, according to another popular Grail book, Bloodline of the Holy Grail by Laurence Gardner, the
Merovingian dynasty derives its pedigree from the 5th century King Merovee of France, who was reportedly sired by a 'beast out of the sea'--
"...the mysterious sea beast -- the Bistea Neptunis -- as symbolically defined in the Merovingian ancestry. The relevant sea-lord was King Pallas, a
god of old Arcadia…The immortal sea-lord was said to be 'ever-incarnate in a dynasty of ancient kings' whose symbol was a fish - as was the
traditional symbol of Jesus. (4)"
This, 'beast of the sea', implies Enlil, a deity who was once worshipped under similar pretenses. Enlil is also a major contributor to various
biblical tales, not limited to Abraham and the infamous convenant.
Please allow me to continue to quote this site,
"The Merovingian dynasty reigned over Europe from the 5th to the 8th centuries, but was removed from power in 751 A.D. by a document called the
Donation of Constantine. It seems, however, that the Roman Catholic authorities did not recognize the Messianic claim of the Merovingian lords but
viewed the cult with a morbid suspicion of ulterior motives: "During the latter years of the declining Empire, the greatest of all threats to the
Roman Church arose from a Desposynic royal strain in Gaul. They were the Merovingian dynasty…" 29:163 According to Sir Laurence Gardner's Realm of
the Ring Lords, the Donation of Constantine was created for the express purpose of overthrowing this dynasty of pagan kings, was a fraud:
". . . [I]t is important to consider the original document which made church kingship possible in the first place . . . because the implementation of
this particular document some 1,248 years ago led to just about every social injustice that has been experienced in the Christian world. The document
to which I refer is called 'The Donation of Constantine.' All monarchical and governmental practice has, for centuries, been based on the initial
precept of this charter, but...the precept is invalid. There are those in our midst today who, under the dynasty rule of Grail entitlement, are
rightful kings and queens. When the Donation made its first appearance in the middle 8th century, it was alleged to have been written by Emperor
Constantine 400 years earlier (although, strangely, never produced in the interim). It was even dated and carried his supposed signature. What the
document proclaimed was that the Pope was Christ's elected representative on Earth, with the power to 'create' kings as his subordinates. The
provisions were put into operation by the Vatican in 751 whereupon the longstanding Merovingians were deposed and a whole new dynasty was supplemented
by way of a family who had hitherto been mayors of the Royal Palace (the equivalent of prime ministers). They were dubbed 'Carolingians', and their
only king of any consequence. . .was the legendary Charlemagne." - 248
Following the demise of the Fisher-Kings, the deposed Merovingian families devised a plan to reestablish their dynasty.
1. The Merovingians established monasteries in order to infiltrate the Roman Catholic Church.
2. St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Merovingian founder of the Cistercian Order, instituted spiritual principles for warrior-monks which justified and
encouraged killing 'infidels' in Christ's name (rather than preaching the Gospel to them).
3. Bernard of Clairvaux also created the secretive Prieuré de Sion.
4. Under the auspices of the Merovingian-manipulated Catholic Church, the first Crusade would be launched to regain the Holy Land...
... After the Knights Templar were destroyed, the Prieuré de Sion carried on with its secret mission to reinstate Merovingian bloodline:
"There was a secret order behind the Knights Templars, which created the Templars as its military and administrative arm. This order, which has
functioned under a variety of names, is most frequently known as the Prieuré de Sion. ...Although the Knights Templar were destroyed and dissolved
between 1307 and 1314, the Prieuré de Sion remained unscathed.- 31:106-7 "
A site that documents this coordination of efforts pretty well is @ watch.pair.com...
and is where these last excerpts originated.
In the research project concerning the Israeli Palestinian conflict, I have outlined precisely the same thing. That both sides are aiming for the same
goal in mind. What that goal is exactly is anyone's best guess, but it seems to be quite the malevolent objective. This collection of bloodlines, of
which the Merovingians are a major contributor of in the last two millenia, is responsible for instigating both sides of the conflict. This would also
help to explain why Hitler, who was sanctioned by the same kind of elitists, would have a government that supported people like Hussein while at the
same time agreeing and promoting the ideaologies of a certain Rothschild and Herzle, who were both crucial to the foundation of the Zionist movement.
You see, Rothschild is most definitely an ancestor of the Merovingian bloodline, which in itself, is an extension of a very very old bloodline that
goes back to Sumerian 'royalty'. This would also explain why Husseini and Arafat are related and why Arafat, for one, has remained the public leader
of the Palestinians when I am quite sure that there are many of such people under his control who do not agree with all of his efforts.
If any of you made it this far in terms of reading all of this, I am impressed. You have certainly beaten the odds
[Edited on 5/5/2004 by AlnilamOmega]