It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

H.R. 675: Building Obama's Civilian National Security Force

page: 1
13
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 01:36 PM
link   

H.R. 675: Building Obama's Civilian National Security Force


www.globalresearch.ca

In January, without any recognizable corporate media coverage, Rep. Bob Filner, a California Democrat, introduced H.R. 675. The bill would amend title 10 of the United States Code and extend to civilian employees of the Department of Defense the authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms. The bill was referred to the Armed Services Committee on January 26, 2009.
Filner’s bill would amend the United States code with the following: “Sec. 1585b. Law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense: authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms… for
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 01:36 PM
link   
Here we go. Time for our Servitude. Will this be mandatory? I’m very Patriotic and enjoy contributing in my community but I despise being forced in to Obama’s Work Brigade. I’m already opposed to the GIVE Act, requiring children to perform mandatory servitude.

HR 675 states

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide police officers, criminal investigators, and game law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense with authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms.

Resist H.R 675


H.R 675 which has no co-sponsors yet, would effectively turn the military into law enforcement, also give many other non-law enforcement the power to arrest and carry firearms.



Basically, this would serve to merge the police and military even further, and at the same time drastically expand the size of the available forces to be used against the American people, which it's quite obvious at this point the Federal Government is gearing up to wage war against the American people, turning the police state against them, enslaving them, destroying the Constitution, and also setting up their world dictatorship to lord over us as some sub-human species of slaves.


lessgov2007.blogspot.com...



www.globalresearch.ca
(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 29-6-2009 by wonderworld]



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 01:53 PM
link   
In 2008 Americans went to sleep, in 2011 they woke up to find themselves in a new Orwellian reality with no hope of escape, powerless to stop the change they so badly wanted, some tried to revolt but were quickly crushed by the CNSF. When the cities were cordoned off separating the productive society from the non a new leader of the dissenters arose and once again there was hope for us, but before the elections the CNSF assassinated him and planted evidence of subversion, which under the new laws made his killing justified. Soon we will all be forced into buses and taken to the new progressive reorientation camps where God only knows what will happen. I really wish people would have stopped this when they had a chance in 2010.

Sincerely,

Fromthefuture




posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 01:54 PM
link   
I question the cost in terms of training and arming such a population.

Or would they simply have them 'out there' without training; on their own mandate to secure arrests and enforce laws, or conduct law enforcement intelligence gathering as an adjunct to what we already pay for with our taxes?

I wonder if anyone has ever said 'enough' to these people?

Are we so 'out of control' as a society that we actually need this?

I suspect that Bob Finer is representing the interests of certain 'security' consulting agencies that stand to prosper handsomely from this development. Rather, and in all fairness, the ONE political party represents those and other such interests.

Oh yes, I said, and meant, ONE political party. The divisions are just... "Politainment" for the bread and circus production of Madison Avenue and Hollywood.



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 02:22 PM
link   
reply to post by Maxmars
 


You haven't seen "out of control" yet.

Just wait until you see the SHTF when the vast majority of Americans finally wake up to the changes in their lives, and millions more people lose jobs because of cap and trade and health care reform among other things including the fact that the government will have control over nearly every aspect of the financial world, industry and vast areas of the private sector.

They need to be preparing for chaos, and they are. They have to, it must be a part of the plan, you cannot fully control the economy until you have all of the means in place to fully control the people.

The conversion of the US economy from capitalist to socialist will have to happen fast, they know it, are pushing it hard and they know the clock is ticking... How long it takes for the majority of Americans to wake up to what is actually happening here is the only factor they cannot fully control right now. Pray it happens soon!

Meanwhile in the Jackson case, shocking new developments....

...



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 02:23 PM
link   

Sec. 1585b. Law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense: authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms
‘(a) Authority- The Secretary of Defense may authorize any law enforcement officer of the Department of Defense--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



‘(1) to execute and serve any warrant or other process issued under the authority of the United States;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



‘(2) to make arrests without a warrant--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



1‘(A) for any offense against the United States committed in the presence of that officer; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink



‘(B) for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States if the officer has probable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing the felony; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink



‘(3) to carry firearms.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



‘(b) Persons To Have Authority- Subsection (a) applies to any law enforcement officer of the Department of Defense whose duties include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



‘(1) enforcing laws enacted for the protection of persons and property;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



1‘(2) preventing breaches of the peace and suppressing affrays or unlawful assemblies;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



‘(3) conducting, supervising, or coordinating investigations of criminal activity in programs and operations of the Department of Defense; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink



‘(4) enforcing any rules or regulations with respect to Department of Defense property prescribed by duly authorized officials.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



‘(c) Guidelines on Exercise of Authority- The authority provided under subsection (a) shall be exercised in accordance with guidelines issued by the Secretary of Defense and approved by the Attorney General.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



‘(d) Definition of Law Enforcement Officer of the Department of Defense- In this section, the term ‘law enforcement officer of the Department of Defense’ means a civilian employee of the Department of Defense who is any of the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



‘(1) A Federal police officer or detective as classified by the Office of Personnel Management Occupational Series 0083 (or any successor to that series).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



‘(2) A game law enforcement officer or special agent as classified by the Office of Personnel Management Occupational Series 1812 (or any successor to that series).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



‘(3) A criminal investigator as classified by the Office of Personnel Management Occupational Series 1811 (or any successor to that series) and not employed as a special agent of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (or any successor to that service).’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



‘1585b. Law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense: authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink


www.opencongress.org...

What happened to the Bill of Rights? All we can do is nothing! We must sit back and take it I guess. Reality hits!



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 03:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by wonderworld

What happened to the Bill of Rights?


How dare you ask such a treasonous question.

Obama currently has a "legal regime" set up and in place to "assure that the rule of law is protected and, that rights are protected under the rule of law"

He said so himself.

Funny, he needs a "legal regime" now don't you think?

Basically this "legal regime" is tasked with finding and exploiting loopholes in the "rule of law" so as to protect and advance their agendas where any "rule of law" can get in the way.

Stay tuned, you haven't seen the worst yet.



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 03:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Walkswithfish
 


Yes, I know, I'm guessing SHTF by 2010. Still a bit of time to prepare. I also expect to see more similar bills, possibly deceptively stuck in the the Global Warming bill.



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 03:20 PM
link   
Its time to IMpeach obama...thats all i have to say. Making anyoen serve withouth their consent, outside of the draft, is illegal, our countrys documetned constitution says so, so deos bill fo rights... Obama has broken one of the highest laws int he lland! traitor...traitors, by law, are supposed to e hung publicly. I dont mena to advocate any knid fo violence, but geesh, sometimes the point and law must be taught VERY ell, so others will see what happens when the law of the land is broken.
This is that Emmanuel guys idea, the laid back easy going, never worked so hard in his life skeever.. Bet he dosnt have any callasus on his hands..and to think he came up with this sevitude idea? Meaningingless!



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 03:26 PM
link   
I hate to say it but slavery is what the US might deserve. Not that I have anything against the US but the fact is that you guys didn't stop it from happening. If the country as a whole isn't going to stop such from happening then doesn't it deserve it?



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 03:31 PM
link   
This is exactly what went through my mind..slavery. Youde think after the civil war, ths was all layed to rest..bill of rights, understanding and compasion for human ethics! For soem reason, this sounds like the civil war all over again...only its not so much race..its citizens agianst a socialist dictator. Hence forth, impeachment by order of mass numbers of public slaves(aka taxpayers)..if that were the case, the public is the majority and everyone knows, majority overrrules!



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 04:04 PM
link   
reply to post by ziggy1706
 


You should be more careful with the use of certain key words, like Obama and impeach in the same post along with other language that stands out as strong opposition to the Obama administration, in the not too distant future they are going to have much more control over the Internet as well, new unprecedented powers that will give them the ability to find key words and phrases in postings anywhere, including ATS, then they will get your IP information, not that they will need it, the new Internet that is taking form now will give them real time ability to monitor LIVE two way communications between any computer(s) and servers or server networks. They can easily track you down and either schedule you for reprogramming, or elimination. At a minimum audit you, find errors in your taxes, and/or put you in jail for anything they "find"



I'm not worried though, I'm already a dead man, so I have nothing to fear.

Bring it!



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 04:06 PM
link   
Enjoy your freedoms while they last.

Especially your freedom of speech!



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 04:19 PM
link   
If Bush got away with being a dictator -- and -- we're still intact (more or less), what makes you think Obama is going to be any different?

I sort of think he'll come and go, as Bush did, Americans will elect another bush/obama type of president, and things will slowly get worse, as they have been since Reagan/Thatcher.

Remember, they NEED us. They NEED us.
We don't need them -- THEY NEED US. That's why they've spent so much time/money/resources on this eternal struggle to capture our minds. So far they've done a good job


[edit on 29-6-2009 by Kaytagg]



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 04:21 PM
link   


Remember, they NEED us. They NEED us.
We don't need them -- THEY NEED US. That's why they've spent so much time/money/resources on this eternal struggle to capture our minds. So far they're done a good job

They don't. And they've explained why in the article Why the future doesn't need us

They don't. They want to kill 80-100% of all humanity.

[edit on 29-6-2009 by Vitchilo]



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 04:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kaytagg
I sort of think he'll come and go, as Bush did, Americans will elect another bush/obama type of president, and things will slowly get worse, as they have been since Reagan/Thatcher.


Obama is not at all worried about being re-elected in 2012, in fact it is obvious by his actions so far through pushing through massive spending, and very destructive reform plans that are going to be extremely unpopular and destructive to the economy, that he no doubt expects that the people will turn on him, and will not vote for him in 2012....

You really should start to worry now, that he is NOT seeking re-election!

The fact that his reckless agendas will likely halt his future political aspirations should tell you that he either does not want to be re-elected or does not NEED to be re-elected!

He also, I am sure is expecting a huge turnover of power in congress in 2010... That is exactly why they are pushing so hard and fast to get their legislation through with hundreds of amendments that NO ONE even reads before voting on.

Obama is not stupid, he knows these things he is doing will have devastating impact on the economy, and on the lives of millions of Americans... He simply does not care.

Why????

[edit on 29-6-2009 by Walkswithfish]



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 04:55 PM
link   
So in essence 'Our Glorious Leader' wants his own Basiji. "WOW They looked SOOO cool on TV!"



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 04:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Walkswithfish
 


You're acting like there's a difference between parties. Obama doesn't care because he knows that even if he's not reelected or congress isn't, he'll still have what he wants. Remember the democrats in 2006? Yeah between 2006 and 2008, they still supported Bush.

Obama is still continuing the globalist-treasonous agenda of Bush.



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 05:23 PM
link   
I, for one, welcome the regime. It will be great to surrender our will to the government for the good of the people. I look forward to serving.



TA



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 05:41 PM
link   
Vitchilo has a good point. It doesn't matter who sits in the throne, the power behind that are always the same. Bush, Obama, Clinton etc. all the same. It's just like an actors job, go there and be the face and smile to the camera.
If the fact that Obama has broken most of his key campaign promises doesn't convince you of this then I dont know what will.



new topics

top topics



 
13
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join