It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dariousg
My problem is that we still haven't truly justified our invasion which pretty much makes it illegal.
Originally posted by Styki
If things go well the next few months with coalition soldiers out of major Iraqi cities then I think everybody can start calling this a victory. We don't want to be in Iraq forever! The last few years have been all about building up Iraq to the point where they could handle things on their own. Who knows, maybe it's getting to the point where we need to dust off that ol "Mission Accomplished" sign. Only time can tell.
Originally posted by Tank2/8
reply to post by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
At the time, our forces should have been directed elsewhere.
Originally posted by bismarcksea
Blah blah blah, the talking heads will keep talking while Iraq plunges itself into some sort of a civil war. Just watch!
Originally posted by Tartarspoon
thank God President Obama is partly responsible for this
maybe we can get a complete withdrawal out of Iraq and Afghanistan in the near future.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
When Bush started all this Iraq hooplah, I couldn't believe it. At that time, Iraq was a broken, starving state that would be hard pressed launching a rock over the Iranian border, let alone becoming this menace to the world.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
When Bush started all this Iraq hooplah, I couldn't believe it. At that time, Iraq was a broken, starving state that would be hard pressed launching a rock over the Iranian border, let alone becoming this menace to the world.
- Saddam is the one who started the 'hooplah' by breaking the UN resolutions and the ceasefire agreements which carried a consequence of force being used and in which HE AGREED TO.
- Iraq wasn't a 'broken starving state' and it was doing more than just attempting to throw rocks. It was oil rich. It had the fourth largest army in the world as well as WMD and Nuclear Labs. Yes .. WMD. Ask the Kurds that managed to live. They'll tell you about the thousands who didn't.
Originally posted by Jakes51
When have the United States really left any country we have been involved in militarily? I state some examples, Japan and Germany since World War 2 and Korea since the Korean War.
Originally posted by spy66
The threat of Iraq making WMD is a big lie.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Jakes51
When have the United States really left any country we have been involved in militarily? I state some examples, Japan and Germany since World War 2 and Korea since the Korean War.
Japan and Germany waged war against the world. They were the instigators of those wars. They LOST the wars and therefore the forces that won the war had the right (and duty) to disarm them and stay to inforce it and to keep watch over them to make sure they didn't arm up again.
Now Japan and Germany want all the GIs there to spend their money and to keep the economy going. Local businesses want the $$$. Now a lot of why we are there are for economic reasons.
In Korea, the USA was invited to stay by the South Koreans in order to keep the Southern half of the country free from the communist Chinese.