Smoker decides to grow his own tobacco , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times
Topic started on 29-6-2009 @ 09:53 AM by DimensionalDetective

Smoker decides to grow his own tobacco


www.ohio.com
Carey, 49, decided in April, when federal taxes on tobacco skyrocketed, to grow his own.

''I thought it was an April Fools' joke,'' he said of the tax increase that sent taxes on roll-your-own tobacco up 2,153 percent.

There is something ''fundamentally wrong about picking on the smokers all the time,'' said Carey, whose experiment with growing tobacco comes as President Barack Obama last week signed the strongest anti-smoking bill in history. The measure gives the Food and Drug Administration the authority to regulate tobacco for the first time.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 09:59 AM by ldyserenity
reply to post by DimensionalDetective



Now that is what I am talking about, there's somebody taking his own initiative, someone taking steps not to depend on capatilism! Let's just see how this will play out though, I am sure the government will have to step in as per the alcohol, tobacco, and firearms department. That's why they have that dept. they have control over who can grow it, how much they can grow, It's almost illegal to grow your own, so I am sure there will be some more news on this probably him paying some outrageous fees and fines, I wouldn't doubt.

[edit on 29-6-2009 by ldyserenity]



reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 10:09 AM by Oreyeon
Originally posted by ldyserenity
reply to
post by DimensionalDetective



Now that is what I am talking about, there's somebody taking his own initiative, someone taking steps not to depend on capatilism! Let's just see how this will play out though, I am sure the government will have to step in as per the alcohol, tobacco, and firearms department. That's why they have that dept. they have control over who can grow it, how much they can grow, It's almost illegal to grow your own, so I am sure there will be some more news on this probably him paying some outrageous fees and fines, I wouldn't doubt.

[edit on 29-6-2009 by ldyserenity]


Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if they don't raid him, and kill him. Making him an example so the rest of us don't attempt to follow suit.



reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 10:22 AM by ldyserenity
reply to post by jaamaan



I plan on doing this eventually, right now I haven't got the land, but honestly, I don't think I want to smoke anymore if I do this, it'll be hard to breathe trying to plow, seed, and harvest with my smokers lungs lol.

I sure will miss coffee though, as it really won't grow that I know of, here in North America.


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 10:24 AM by ldyserenity
reply to post by Oreyeon



Yeah, that's pretty much what I was alluding to. But, someone else posted you are allowed to grow enough only to supply yourself. I didn't even think that was the case.


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 10:26 AM by grapesofraft
reply to post by ldyserenity



Captitalism is not the problem. The problem is an anti capitalism government that is over taxing products just to try to engineer society and influence peoples behaviors and to give the government control of more money which they will promptly waste.


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 10:33 AM by ldyserenity
reply to post by grapesofraft




Yes, that's true the Government does run the capitalism... It still falls under the same umbrella. However, I beleive the big corporations who run on capitalism are also the problem, especially when A F'ing PS 3 is outsourced to produce it for 25 cents each in china by exploited underaged citizens, and then they sell it for 400 bucks to gullible americans, do you see what I am getting at?


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 10:44 AM by ldyserenity
reply to post by Unit541




I've also read it takes up to maybe five/six years for the plants to yeild any coffee to brew. I have no problem toasting the beans as I was taught the pocess by the owner of a coffee shop...it's just the wait and like you said it may not yeild enough for my consumption either. But, there's an easier substitute, chicory isn't too bad. It's also pretty prevalent in The North Americas.


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 10:58 AM by grapesofraft
Originally posted by ldyserenity
reply to
post by grapesofraft




Yes, that's true the Government does run the capitalism... It still falls under the same umbrella. However, I beleive the big corporations who run on capitalism are also the problem, especially when A F'ing PS 3 is outsourced to produce it for 25 cents each in china by exploited underaged citizens, and then they sell it for 400 bucks to gullible americans, do you see what I am getting at?


I dont think a big corporation is necessarily a bad thing. Are there big corporations that abuse the system? Sure. Do they all do it? No

A PS3 is a bad example, because I am pretty sure even at $400 they loose money, which they hope to make up on selling games. I guess there are two things here. One, wouldnt you produce things as cheaply as you could so you could compete in a global economy? Do they force stupid Americans to spend $400 on them?


reply posted on 29-6-2009 @ 11:01 AM by scubagravy
reply to post by XXXN3O



Are you saying that i may be onto something here?? Its puzzled me for a while. I can understand why trying to find information on the net to validate this would be somewhat difficult.

I will follow my theory a little closer from now on.

Thankyou for that input, i can imagine you may recieve some critism from others on your post, but u get a star from me.

External box thinking, I like it !!
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 3 days ago with 81 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 4 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 15 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 3 days ago with 48 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 10 days ago with 37 member flags