It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tsloan
Listen this is not a party issue man...This is a government issue...DON'T you see that...? This has nothing to do with any party cause they are the same across the board stop making this about he would or they would or this president wouldn't have or that party would have...This is YOUR government enslaving you...Come on.
Originally posted by Essan
.....................
Personally I think acidification of the oceans and a need to reduce reliance on Russian gas and Iranian oil are more important reasons to cut GHG emissions - and justify any such plans regardless of any impact on climate.
....................
Originally posted by mikerussellus
Whether or not CO2 is a cause is debatable. Given.
Volcanoes, however, emit (during eruptions) more CO2 than man could ever produce.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Tell us, if CO2 really causes mayor damage by acidification in the oceans how come in times when the Earth's atmosphere had 7 times as much CO2 as now there was plenty of life in the oceans?....
Originally posted by awdbawl
I'm sorry I believe c02 emissions, factory pollutions, etc are a real problem. I'd be willing to bet none of you are environmental scientists. Seems like you people are just as corrupt because when it comes to money, you don't want to take the necessary steps to help the environment. There have been drastic climate changes that have occurred coincidentally since the industrial revolution, are you claiming big businesses degrading the environment has virtually no impact?!............
Originally posted by Essan
Well, actually they don't. In ann avergae year volcanoes produce about 1/100th of the CO2 produced by human activity
Originally posted by Essan
As for no net warming in recent years, anyone heard of the solar minium? The one that some argue is making it colder? (hence no doubt the current heatwaves in the USA, Europe, India and China). Amazing as it may seem, CO2 is not the only factor in global temps.
Besides which, climate is measured over decades.
But some folk - including scientists - conveniently ignore this if it suits their agenda.
Originally posted by Essan
Because life at that time had evolved to exist in more acidic oceans?
It's like arguing why would filling a freshwater lake with salt kill off all the fresh water fish when fish clearly thrive in salty oceans.
Originally posted by Essan
Species adapt to their environment. Some can cope with sudden changes, many cannot. Yes, it's happened many, many tomes before - but should humans knowingly cause such an event today when they can prevent it?
Not that it's stopped us buring the rain forests ......
Current warmth seems to be occurring nearly everywhere at the same time and is largest at high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere. Over the last 50 years, the largest annual and seasonal warmings have occurred in Alaska, Siberia and the Antarctic Peninsula. Most ocean areas have warmed. Because these areas are remote and far away from major cities, it is clear to climatologists that the warming is not due to the influence of pollution from urban areas.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
There is approximately 120 billion tonnes of natural emitting CO2 every year compared to the about 7 billion tonnes released by mankind.
No doubt, like always, you like to leave out the fact that this winter lasted longer than normal, and for the past 3 winters at least throughout most of the Earth there have been some of the worse winters to have occurred in a long time. Some countries have experienced the worse winters in decades, and in the case of China, the worse winter in about 100 years.
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to post by VitriolAndAngst
To be frank, your arguements are off base. If it (the reports, the results) are so off base then why did they hide it? Why did they try to silence it?
They
Don't
Care
About
Global
Warming
Period.
They just want to raise taxes.They just want to control more.
Why is this so hard to comprehend?
CCSP
Climate Change Science Program
www.nsf.gov...
Just briefly read their website. Cute. They spout the whole party line about GW and state that global warming is derived from data sometimes collected over thousands, millions of years. In the footnote though, they say they took data over a 30 year period.
Originally posted by VitriolAndAngst
reply to post by mikerussellus
CCSP
Climate Change Science Program
www.nsf.gov...
Just briefly read their website. Cute. They spout the whole party line about GW and state that global warming is derived from data sometimes collected over thousands, millions of years. In the footnote though, they say they took data over a 30 year period.
>> Arg.
I'm suppressing the urge to scream. Since the scientists are NOT ALIVE millions of years ago, and the study is done on present day earth -- of COURSE they are sampling data over a 30 year period.
The collection of data, is things like ice cores and matching that up with data you collected in the past 30 years. If some reading in the ice jibes with some reading millions of years ago, you try to extrapolate.
That's the best we can do until a time machine is built.
Or, like the Anti-Global Warming Crowd often does, you can just get in a box and pretend you are going back in time, and that there is no Global Warming. As long as you bring the covers up over your head, the monster in the closet can't get you.