Australian scientists kill cancer cells with "Trojan Horse" (Reuters)- Cure Found?

page: 3
94
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 08:10 AM
link   
Chemo only helps 3% of the people that take it. The other 97% suffer and die horribly. They have to find another way. I've seen it up close. There lying. Chemo kills.





posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 08:59 AM
link   
Didnt Obama say that during his time in office, that he was going to find a cure for Cancer? Or was that HIV? Or is the messiah going to find a cure for both?



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 09:53 AM
link   
Everyones saying this is never going to see the light of day, but surely not every single medical practitioner or pharmaceutical company in the world is saying 'we cannot benifit from this, we'll make no money'. A cure for cancer im sure, is one of the most sought after things in human life right now. So why can't a cure this promising, be adopted by someone?

Am i missing something here?



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 10:05 AM
link   
Hummmm... they did a movie about this didn´t they ??

"I am Legend"



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 10:21 AM
link   
It looks like there might be a cure for HIV too in sight.

Cure in sight for HIV infection

I'm just hoping that these get the media attention they need.



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 10:26 AM
link   
reply to post by kiwifoot
 


I'll still take Intravenous Ascorbic Acid over this, thank you very much.



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 10:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by eldard
reply to post by kiwifoot
 


I'll still take Intravenous Ascorbic Acid over this, thank you very much.



I can only talk from experience here. I have had a lot of chemotherapy for my brain tumour. I dont believe i would still be here without it. I have to put my faith and trust in the doctors who treat me and so far Im doing pretty well considering the diagnosis. The chemo I had is very expensive and i thank the NHS for all their amazing care. I'm sure others will have a different story to tell , but from my experience all I know is chemo has helped me and many others survive longer.

The problem is why are young healthy people like myself getting cancer in the first place.



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 10:48 AM
link   
That's the whole thing isn't it.. 'survive longer'.
I have nothing against that if the quality of life in that survival time is good, thankfully it sounds like yours is, which I'm pleased about.


My 15yr old step son has cancer, he was diagnosed early last year, they operated/removed the tumours in his neck and chest and he's been having radiotherapy treatment ever since.

It's now spread to his lungs, and we're awaiting results on his last scan, hoping the radiotherapy has killed it off. Fingers crossed please, because none of us want to have to go through chemo..

So bearing all that in mind I am very interested in any 'proven' medication or therapy. I'll be keeping my eye out for this.

Thanks for posting.



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 11:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by rgseymour
reply to post by Oreyeon
 


Oreyeon, I dig your analogy "Think of the Pharma as the Pimp, and the Disease as the Whore".




Thank you.
Only speaking the truth here. It relates to more than just the Pharma. Basically any Corporate entity that is making money off of humankind's suffering falls to this analogy. It's quite sad that the Human Race is unable to get past the ignorant delusion of material value that is seen in a piece of colored and patterned paper. It's sad when a non-living "thing" such as paper money, is valued more than a living being. It's sad that we all suffer at the hands of this grand delusion, that we pay for it with our lives, and the continued destruction of our homeworld.



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 12:19 PM
link   
reply to post by kiwifoot
 


Many amazing cures and less invasive surgeries are allowed in other Countries. The US wont allow it. It's a big game of wealth and control.

I'd move there if I ever got cancer, no doubt! Are they testing on humans yet or just the cells, themselves. It takes a while to see any severe side effects.

S&F very good thread!



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 12:23 PM
link   
reply to post by ELECTRICkoolaidZOMBIEtest
 


Sorry
we lost someone to it too, probably be years before it reaches the NHS



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 02:13 PM
link   
Do you realize how many times we've all seen and heard stories like this over the years? Time after time after time...... And nothing ever comes of it. Nothing ever will either as long as we are kept in the dark about who really runs the world. This will be forgotten and swept under the rug 3 months from now, i guarantee.



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 02:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Paveway27
reply to post by Oreyeon
 


Gotta agree with this guy. This will be last we hear of it, they (Pharmacy compines) will kill the people who made the cure. Or at least make it so it doesnt work and kill the peoples Characters. It happens all the time. There was a cure back in the 70's i read about in a book called "Behold a Pale Horse" Dude was killed. All I have to say is I hope this works out well.


Wow, thanks for that enlightening posting with all the references and facts!

I have a Capt. Underwear book written in 1998, can you perhaps use that to shed some light on a cure for colon cancer?



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 02:44 PM
link   
Will probably be paid off / bought up / suppressed / shutdown / "forgotten" / "disproved", whatever method they chose...



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 04:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Flatwoods
Just imagine for a moment what the world would be like if cancer were cured. Millions - possibly billions - of people who would otherwise die wouldn't, and the worldwide population would skyrocket. You'd see people living well past 100 years, maybe to 150, 200, and beyond. New and severe limits to human reproduction would have to be brutally enforced - the population control policies of China would seem mild by comparison.

What is most horrifying is that while cancer would no longer exist, most of the other ailments and difficulties of old age would. An enormous amount of mankind's resources, time, and energy would have to be devoted to caring for the increasing multitudes of elderly who, without cancer, would continue to breathe. I say breathe because, with bodies so emaciated and frail, you wouldn't call them living.

If you think about it, a cure for cancer may turn out to be the cruelest invention ever devised.

[edit on 29-6-2009 by Flatwoods]


Man you seriously need to come down to earth from planet America. Yeah you can be forgiven because it seems you live on that planet..but hey I thought 300 damn years of existence would be enough so you people get a damn clue about anything? No? Well too bad.

Lets get it from the start then. Cancer is a modern disease. Cancer did exist probably forever but it was really bordering from extremely rare to a rare disease and even then curable cases existed. Hell you can even hear stories about the hardest diseases we face today that had simple cures back then. Cancer is a modern disease in the way it frequents the human race the last 200 years. It wasn't like what we see today, really. What else was happening before 200+ years. Ah yes people would live to be 100 years old and were still productive. Now you only need to get to 60 and become a non productive member of our society because of the way of the rapidly deteriorated standards we call "modern life". Guess where simple living became the "modern life" we now know and "enjoy"..


Yeah, right there in your planet Mister. So another "modern" contribution to society would be to just kill those aging "non-productive" people. I am sure you would be capable for that also, given the right "circumstances".. God knows how many other things you have screwed for the rest of us and will keep on screwing up. I have a feeling we have not seen the bottom of this pit..yet.

[edit on 29-6-2009 by spacebot]



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 04:14 PM
link   
How many cures for cancer are they going to discover and suppress from market because of the current medicine that merely sustains but breaks all sorts of quarterly profits?

Probably a lot more than this one...



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 04:33 PM
link   
That's very remarkable. I hope it develops into a full blown cure before friends, family or myself might need it.



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 05:05 PM
link   
This is an amazing discovery. I an in Australia and this made the main stream news yesterday, amid all the mayhem of the death of Michael Jackson. Most Aussies are over this and its still the number one news story, 3 days now.
Anyway this nano cell treatment had been tested on lab animals and was last tested on dogs which had cancer with 100% results. Human trials are going to start soon. This treatment worked on drug resistant cancers which is a bonus.

This should have been the top story of the day, no the death of the king of Pop.



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 06:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Nathan9197
Everyones saying this is never going to see the light of day, but surely not every single medical practitioner or pharmaceutical company in the world is saying 'we cannot benifit from this, we'll make no money'. A cure for cancer im sure, is one of the most sought after things in human life right now. So why can't a cure this promising, be adopted by someone?

Am i missing something here?


Respectfully, yes, I think you are underestimating the evilness of the Pharma INDUSTRY, and the willingness of the medical community to ignore the dangers of having the pharmaceutical companies in charge of our health care.



posted on Jun, 29 2009 @ 09:57 PM
link   
The FDA will not allow this cure to happen. And if a Dr. practice it, he will lose his license.





new topics
top topics
 
94
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join