Chemo only helps 3% of the people that take it. The other 97% suffer and die horribly. They have to find another way. I've seen it up close. There lying. Chemo kills.

Didnt Obama say that during his time in office, that he was going to find a cure for Cancer? Or was that HIV? Or is the messiah going to find a cure for both?

Everyones saying this is never going to see the light of day, but surely not every single medical practitioner or pharmaceutical company in the world is saying 'we cannot benifit from this, we'll make no money'. A cure for cancer im sure, is one of the most sought after things in human life right now. So why can't a cure this promising, be adopted by someone?

Am i missing something here?

Hummmm... they did a movie about this didn´t they ??

"I am Legend"

That's the whole thing isn't it.. 'survive longer'.
I have nothing against that if the quality of life in that survival time is good, thankfully it sounds like yours is, which I'm pleased about.

My 15yr old step son has cancer, he was diagnosed early last year, they operated/removed the tumours in his neck and chest and he's been having radiotherapy treatment ever since.

It's now spread to his lungs, and we're awaiting results on his last scan, hoping the radiotherapy has killed it off. Fingers crossed please, because none of us want to have to go through chemo..

So bearing all that in mind I am very interested in any 'proven' medication or therapy. I'll be keeping my eye out for this.

Thanks for posting.

Do you realize how many times we've all seen and heard stories like this over the years? Time after time after time...... And nothing ever comes of it. Nothing ever will either as long as we are kept in the dark about who really runs the world. This will be forgotten and swept under the rug 3 months from now, i guarantee.

Will probably be paid off / bought up / suppressed / shutdown / "forgotten" / "disproved", whatever method they chose...

Originally posted by Flatwoods
Just imagine for a moment what the world would be like if cancer were cured. Millions - possibly billions - of people who would otherwise die wouldn't, and the worldwide population would skyrocket. You'd see people living well past 100 years, maybe to 150, 200, and beyond. New and severe limits to human reproduction would have to be brutally enforced - the population control policies of China would seem mild by comparison.

What is most horrifying is that while cancer would no longer exist, most of the other ailments and difficulties of old age would. An enormous amount of mankind's resources, time, and energy would have to be devoted to caring for the increasing multitudes of elderly who, without cancer, would continue to breathe. I say breathe because, with bodies so emaciated and frail, you wouldn't call them living.

If you think about it, a cure for cancer may turn out to be the cruelest invention ever devised.

[edit on 29-6-2009 by Flatwoods]

Man you seriously need to come down to earth from planet America. Yeah you can be forgiven because it seems you live on that planet..but hey I thought 300 damn years of existence would be enough so you people get a damn clue about anything? No? Well too bad.

Lets get it from the start then. Cancer is a modern disease. Cancer did exist probably forever but it was really bordering from extremely rare to a rare disease and even then curable cases existed. Hell you can even hear stories about the hardest diseases we face today that had simple cures back then. Cancer is a modern disease in the way it frequents the human race the last 200 years. It wasn't like what we see today, really. What else was happening before 200+ years. Ah yes people would live to be 100 years old and were still productive. Now you only need to get to 60 and become a non productive member of our society because of the way of the rapidly deteriorated standards we call "modern life". Guess where simple living became the "modern life" we now know and "enjoy"..

Yeah, right there in your planet Mister. So another "modern" contribution to society would be to just kill those aging "non-productive" people. I am sure you would be capable for that also, given the right "circumstances".. God knows how many other things you have screwed for the rest of us and will keep on screwing up. I have a feeling we have not seen the bottom of this pit..yet.

[edit on 29-6-2009 by spacebot]

How many cures for cancer are they going to discover and suppress from market because of the current medicine that merely sustains but breaks all sorts of quarterly profits?

Probably a lot more than this one...

That's very remarkable. I hope it develops into a full blown cure before friends, family or myself might need it.

This is an amazing discovery. I an in Australia and this made the main stream news yesterday, amid all the mayhem of the death of Michael Jackson. Most Aussies are over this and its still the number one news story, 3 days now.
Anyway this nano cell treatment had been tested on lab animals and was last tested on dogs which had cancer with 100% results. Human trials are going to start soon. This treatment worked on drug resistant cancers which is a bonus.

This should have been the top story of the day, no the death of the king of Pop.

Originally posted by Nathan9197
Everyones saying this is never going to see the light of day, but surely not every single medical practitioner or pharmaceutical company in the world is saying 'we cannot benifit from this, we'll make no money'. A cure for cancer im sure, is one of the most sought after things in human life right now. So why can't a cure this promising, be adopted by someone?

Am i missing something here?

Respectfully, yes, I think you are underestimating the evilness of the Pharma INDUSTRY, and the willingness of the medical community to ignore the dangers of having the pharmaceutical companies in charge of our health care.

The FDA will not allow this cure to happen. And if a Dr. practice it, he will lose his license.