Originally posted by donhuangenaro
if evolution theory is correct,
why are still monkeys around?
they didn't evolve for millions of years...
it is yet another proof that there is something wrong
with the theory of evolution (darwinist style) and that
someone or something (aliens or whatever) intervene
and changed the ape DNA to evolve into human as it is now
otherwise this planet would be still filled with apes
that are learning new tricks with sticks
funny thing to me is how darwinists (and scientists in general)
react just like religious people when someone
questions with reason their theories and dogmas
and they call themselves 'open minded'



No, I don't think so.
I'm a scientist and if a new theory comes along that disproves evolution, I will gladly accept it. But so far, none has. Religion and creationism has
ALREADY been disproved. It does not make the scientific community "close-minded".
You misconstrue what "evolution" entails. Evolution does not mean a progression of species from one to another over time - it is a combination of
natural selection and mutation. You think that evolution means over time, ALL monkeys will become HUMANS.
The process of evolution is not straight-forward, and consists of the following:
1) An orangutan or ape is in very poor circumstances. For example, the trees are being eradicated, and they're living in very warm, humid conditions
that are getting worse, due to a combination of geographic factors research is working on now. They require a supine form of walking, on two legs, in
order to speed up the hunt for prey and to get to their fruit and food quickly, since they lack the trees to swing from. They need to get less body
covering - hair - if not they will die of serious overheating.
2) The ability for a primate to use his feet to cling onto the branches and trees starts to diminish. He/it doesn't need to use them as much.
3) Mutation occurs. The feet, instead of being curved, is now flattened out, much like the soles we have on OUR feet today. And since these soles
allow the primates to RUN fast instead of SWING fast - again, the trees are vanishing - these primates with the soles will naturally outrun those
without and will thus get a lion's share of the fruit and insects and little animals and whatnot.
4) The primates WITHOUT soles will die out.
5) The process continues, develops further until WE come to who we are, with the ability to communicate. Those who cannot die off.
6) But ELSEWHERE, there is no need for monkeys in, say, Borneo, to learn to talk and run. Why should they? The trees are aplenty, the swinging is
good, and the food is fantastic.
WHO says aliens interfered?
Again, that is a THEORY at best until proof can be obtained which says that panspermia and alien intervention resulted in spikes in the evolution
chart.
But Creationism is far beyond that. It is a religious theory that cannot and will never be proved, because of the abstract concept of a God Creating
lifeforms out of nothing at all.
If you can prove to me Creation did INDEED happen (and don't go to your Bible for the proof) scientifically then I will say, YES, The Big Bang Theory
is not real and God indeed created the universe as we know it.
Whereas religious conservatives say "No, I REFUSE to believe in ANYTHING ELSE other than God Creating the universe! The Bible said it - it has to be
true! The scientists behave like us, anyway, since they adamantly refuse to believe in a God!"
The fact is that, and you know it too, that Creation is just NOT possible in any scientific field.
It's not a matter of being "open-minded" or "close-minded" it's being rational and logical.
[edit on 29-6-2009 by KarlG]
[edit on 29-6-2009 by KarlG]