World exclusive: NASA Finds Missing Moon Landing Tapes : Update, page 9

reply to post by ArMaP

---

You are correct Armap. They may not have used carbon-dating in particular but they did use some form of radioactive dating process. I'm just not exactly sure which (I had assumed carbon-dating but maybe not?).

We were discussing this in alot more detail in THIS thread by zorgon. You can see my related post on all thisHERE in that thread. But the dating of some of the moon rocks creates a discrepancy that doesn't seem to have ever been directly confronted.

To keep it brief, The idea I posted was this..
Maybe the planet that was impacted wasn't earth at all. Maybe there was another earth-like planet with an orbit very similar to earth's that was impacted by another object. Thus, maybe our moon was really the moon of another planet that earth then captured after it's host planet "tossed it out" into an oblique-type orbital pattern. Just an idea I had.

-ChriS

Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags

Google announces privacy settings change across products; users can\'t opt out
  Posted 17 days ago with 78 member flags

BREAKING: Israel teams with terror group to kill Iran\'s nuclear scientists, U.S. officials tell NBC
  Posted 2 days ago with 73 member flags

Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags

Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags

FDA\'s New Claim: "Your Body Is a Drug—and We Have the Authority to Regulate It"
  Posted 9 days ago with 53 member flags

Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags

Bill Gates Backs Climate Scientists Lobbying For Large-Scale Geoengineering
  Posted 5 days ago with 41 member flags