posted on Mar, 8 2013 @ 12:13 PM
reply to post by Gazrok
Yeah, at best he was seriously mentally disturbed. People like to paint him as some sort of innocent Peter Pan, an image he actively encouraged, but
I'm not so gullible. Michael was an intelligent man. He was not a child. Everything about the man screams, "I prey on children sexually." Now I'm
not saying the people who made the claims of child abuse are above criticism. Their motives were questionable the moment they left their children
alone with this sick individual. However, just because he had a genius-level of talent doesn't mean he has to be deified either. Celebrity seems to
trump common sense here. Don't get me wrong. I'd love to believe he was innocent myself because I'm a fan of his work but he fits the profile of a
predator to a tee. It's obvious that something was wrong there.