reply to post by toochaos4u
The first link you posted is broken and/or doesn’t exist.
If you find another working link please let me know, thanks.
As for your second link - let's take a look at it - and the quote you chose to include, more importantly the ones you didn't.
(Your quote)
His mother showing Michaels checks to his sister and then saying she I don't know if these children were apparently bought from the
parents by Michael or not."
What a stretch that is. And coming (supposedly) a paper in Tel Aviv, Israel - and that article has never been reproduced.
It’s all more ‘let’s sell some tabloids’ hearsay.
If you read the article in it’s completion the whole of the Jackson family, including the mother, went to Michaels defense over these grounded in
lies and hearsay accusations - the same mother who supposedly showed LaToya a check that she stated she
didn’t know what the checks were
for.
Members of the Jackson clan hastily held a news conference at their home in L.A. with father Joe saying that LaToya's charges are
"ridiculous. It's a lie!"
The very article you post
refutes the claims and then backs up the refutes with fact.
She told Couric that she had not personally seen her brother in bed with anyone and wasn't certain that the checks were actually ‘hush'
money to the parents.
Mrs. Jackson added: "I wouldn't let anything like that go on in my home and she knows it. They're (LaToya and husband Jack Gordon) just jumping
on the bandwagon. She is doing it for money, she and her so-called husband, Jack Gordon. That's how they make their money." She described Gordon as
a "money-hungry mongrel."
Couric tried to press her about the large sums of money and Ms. Jackson said the sums were 'substantial' but she could not say with any
degree of certainty what it was for.
(same link from your
post)
The quotes in this article contradict themselves so many times I’m surprised the editor allowed the piece to be released.
Anyway, facts are, Michael, on a regular basis, helped out families, children in need (with cancer, health problems, families in need).
He even went to the extent of using vast amounts of cash and resources to buy a liver for and provide the finical backing to save a young mans
life.
For him to post checks of large sums of money to families in need is proof only of his generosity, not, his failing.
The allegations made by the son of the maid?
...it is believed Mr Francia and his mother, Blanca, received a settlement of more than £1million from Jackson in 1994.
What kind of mother would take a settlement for 1Million dollars and not prosecute if the allegations are true?
Not one I’d believe.
Just more lies for cash.
Concerning Corey Feldman, why didn't you add the truth from Feldman’s own mouth on 20/20 - from the same article?
One example, Feldman said, was that Jackson had a book on his coffee table about "venereal diseases and the genitalia," (not pornography! The
same kind of book you‘d see in science class!) which the singer would show him pictures in and "discuss what those meant."
"I was kind of grossed out by it," Feldman said. "I didn't think of it as a big deal.
Feldman stops short of accusing Jackson of molesting him, saying that he was never touched: "He never harmed me. And he never harmed any
children in front of me."
Jackson, however, "never did anything out of line," Feldman told police detectives. "I mean, the closest he ever came to touching me was
maybe slapping me on the leg once to talk about that I had lost weight.”
Feldman told "20/20" that he's defended Jackson "up and down" with both the public and the police. "I did what I believed was right as a
friend," he said. " 'No, he's not gay. No, he's not a weirdo.' You don't understand the toll that it takes, having to be friends with somebody
like Michael Jackson, because you spend your whole life defending [him]."
And
Macaulay Culkin?
What about the truth came from his very own testimony?
Culkin had kept mum about his relationship with Jackson once the singer faced criminal charges, but he broke his silence in May during an
appearance on CNN's "Larry King Live," where he said his childhood sleepovers at Neverland had been innocent and that "nothing
happened"
link
Michaels childhood abuse.
I’m not going to list the article after article, the first hand account from family members and grounded in fact accusations from Michael - along
with the admissions by his Father - that Michael in deed was beaten and abused as a child on a repeated and ongoing basis.
When the father himself admits it - repeatedly - in my opinion - enough said.
One thing you might want to take into consideration also.
It’s a known fact the majority of child molesters were molested as a child and the numbers of repeating this behavior is said to be astronomical.
Though Michael was beaten as a child, he was not molested.
So one of the most important factor in your *check list of a pedophile* comes up a big fat negative.
Thank you for your post.
peace
[edit on 30-6-2009 by silo13]
