It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by toochaos4u
reply to post by Leo Strauss
Haha! Oh no I have found another man with "Peter Pan Syndrome"!
Do you wear bear and snowflake jammies?
Make sure you distort your face and paint it up like the joker as that is a sure sign you are innocent!
His mother showing Michaels checks to his sister and then saying she I don't know if these children were apparently bought from the parents by Michael or not."
Members of the Jackson clan hastily held a news conference at their home in L.A. with father Joe saying that LaToya's charges are "ridiculous. It's a lie!"
She told Couric that she had not personally seen her brother in bed with anyone and wasn't certain that the checks were actually ‘hush' money to the parents.
Mrs. Jackson added: "I wouldn't let anything like that go on in my home and she knows it. They're (LaToya and husband Jack Gordon) just jumping on the bandwagon. She is doing it for money, she and her so-called husband, Jack Gordon. That's how they make their money." She described Gordon as a "money-hungry mongrel."
(same link from your post)
Couric tried to press her about the large sums of money and Ms. Jackson said the sums were 'substantial' but she could not say with any degree of certainty what it was for.
...it is believed Mr Francia and his mother, Blanca, received a settlement of more than £1million from Jackson in 1994.
One example, Feldman said, was that Jackson had a book on his coffee table about "venereal diseases and the genitalia," (not pornography! The same kind of book you‘d see in science class!) which the singer would show him pictures in and "discuss what those meant."
"I was kind of grossed out by it," Feldman said. "I didn't think of it as a big deal.
Feldman stops short of accusing Jackson of molesting him, saying that he was never touched: "He never harmed me. And he never harmed any children in front of me."
Jackson, however, "never did anything out of line," Feldman told police detectives. "I mean, the closest he ever came to touching me was maybe slapping me on the leg once to talk about that I had lost weight.”
Feldman told "20/20" that he's defended Jackson "up and down" with both the public and the police. "I did what I believed was right as a friend," he said. " 'No, he's not gay. No, he's not a weirdo.' You don't understand the toll that it takes, having to be friends with somebody like Michael Jackson, because you spend your whole life defending [him]."
Culkin had kept mum about his relationship with Jackson once the singer faced criminal charges, but he broke his silence in May during an appearance on CNN's "Larry King Live," where he said his childhood sleepovers at Neverland had been innocent and that "nothing happened"
Originally posted by FireMoon
The only conspiracy that seems to be surrounding the guy is the one of self denial within the music biz. His sexual proclivities were the subject of speculation and rumour, within the biz itself, long before the media printed anything..
Jack o was an expert at manipulating the media, from the fake *little boy voice*, he most certainly did not talk like that in private to the whole *oh woe is me i had a terrible childhood*, story, which remember, even his own siblings said was exaggerated out of all proportion...
The truth is MJ had exhausted the good will of just about all his, once close colleagues, in the music biz because of his manipulative ways and his constant refusal to ever sign a contract over so many thing.s Note how he was attended by a doctor on contract from AEG, it would seem, the man didn't even have his own personal physician, despite his wealth. That alone gives you some insight into the guy's psyche...
The whole *little boy lost* , was an act, an act that allowed him to get away with behaviour, that anyone else would have been in deep trouble for many years ago.
if people are claiming that the evidence against the guy, was fabricated., that is fair enough. However that means you then have to show that ,for instance,. He had no secret room in his bedroom containing a shrine to a young Macauley Culkin and other material associated with an unhealthy interest in young boys. That he did not actually own an adult rabbit costume with the crotch cut out..
I can't believe people cannot see that those exhibits alone would set the alarm bells ringing with anyone with half a brain , as to the guys sexual leanings...
I believe that, MJ encapsuualted so much of the *American Dream* that many simply cannot let go of the fantasy of the guy to see the reality. it hurts too much as it seems to trash the very fibre of that dream if the guy , as it would seem to be , was, sexually, depraved in the way, the evidence suggests he was...
Jason Francia Cross-Examined at Michael Jackson Trial
Wednesday, April 06, 2005
Lead Defence attorney Tom Mesereau cross-examined Jason Francia yesterday about his claims that he was molested by Michael Jackson fifteen years ago.
Mesereau concentrated on interviews given to investigators between 1993 and 2004, and implied that the investigators were pushing for him to say that he was molested although he initially denied the claims. "It was only after you were pushed real hard by the sheriffs that you began to say anything like that," Mesereau said. Francia claimed he could not remember, which would become a frequent answer during his cross-examination, much like when the Arvizo children were cross-examined at the start of the trial.
A segment from an interview Francia had with investigators was read out by Mesereau to refresh the witnesses' memory, "They made me come up with a lot more stuff. They kept pushing. I wanted to hit them in the head." Again, Francia claimed he could not remember, according to the Associated Press. The witness was still unable to remember when Mesereau showed him the transcript of the interview, "Do you remember anything you said in that interview?" the attorney asked, "No," Francia replied.
Francia was last week described as a problematic witness by Mesereau, and he certainly set out to be difficult for the attorney. When Mesereau was trying to point out inconsistencies with his statements, the witness answered, "I don't mean to sound like I'm wasting your time," he said. "It's hard being up here." "Just answer my question," said Mesereau.
Once the witness finished his testimony, the attorney that represented him and his Mother then took the stand. Kris Kallman claimed he reached a financial settlement with Michael's then attorneys in 1995 or 1996, following on from complaints made in 1994 according to the Santa Maria Times. Kallman said the settlement stated it was not an admission of guilt on Michael's part, and that he was only paying to protect his name and image.
Originally posted by FIFIGI
Check this one out here
In David Icke forum there is a theory similar to mine backed up by Russian media. I think there are many unanswered questions at least.
A stiff breeze would be a deadly weapon against this sickly person.
Debbie is not the mother of those first 2 kids.
I believe Michael Jackson chose to leave @ this time...because he was ready...tired of all the pain, drama, being fed on by vampirical entities..media, critics, fans, fellow beings who shared a common wound of abuse physical, emotional etc from an unhealthy father/dysfunctional family life who were unwilling to face and recover from their own experience and pain etc..Earth...believe it or not..is a free will zone..and he chose to leave..,
Originally posted by rapunzel222
it is pretty abnormal for a paediphile to only have one victim, particularly with the number of kids michael had contact with. if he was a paediphile, there should be other kids coming forward, you would think - particularly as there is a lot of money to be had from criminal compensation claims.