reply to post by seataka
Sorry but I am not jumping on this bandwagon.
Never having a childhood is an not an excuse. And a poor one at that. Personally I'm sick of hearing about it, as it some how justifies his
perverted behavior. Neither did any of his brothers with the Jackson 5, yet you don't hear them being accused of child molestation do you?
He grew up plenty enough as an adult to have children with a surrogate mother.
Plenty of people in life feel they did not have a childhood. Whither it be from persistent parents and education, or a sense of duty to other
siblings when their parental figures died abruptly at an early age. I knew plenty of people in high school in which childhood suddenly was ended and
they had to become adults. My cousin being one of them.
Make no excuse for the man. He had a talented career in the 1980's worthy of attention and praise, but that will be forever tarnished by allegations
and payoffs that he himself created by his actions. His death changes NOTHING about that and his past. You are who you make yourself to be.
The facts are clear. In public he was a highly talented artist. Praised, rewarded, granted with great riches. In private the man slept with little
boys that were not his own, naked in his own bed, coupled with child molestation accusations on more than one occasion.
Here is my counter theory. He was highly manipulative, learned in the art of deception from singing at strip clubs as a child and his father. He
extorted you on your view of him being a harmless little boy inside, never having a childhood when in reality he was a monster. It's just as
possible as this article.
Had Joe down the street done what Jackson admitted he had done with boys over the years, coupled with allegations of sexual abuse, Joe down the street
would be in prison right now and labeled a sex offender.
The difference between Joe and Jackson is that Jackson has millions to make it go away, and Joe doesn't.
The amount of payoff so that the allegations were settled out of court instead of reaching the public was proof enough for me and many others. $20
million was the price for his freedom, and not go to jail for a very long time. Those who do not follow him or other artists blindly see this plain
as day.
You don't pay $20 million just to make someone go away, you pay them to keep their mouth shut as part of a deal not to go to trial. Had he been
innocent, he should have went to trial and had his innocence vindicated.
Is it better to be convicted of child molestation, or always leave that question unanswered so there's two sides? He was a very smart man, as he
manipulated the situation to just that. Today people still debate if he was a pedophile, or just a really kind man. Had he been convicted and the
facts of that case laid out, all those questions would be answered -- for or against.
My money is on pedophile, a $20 million one at that.
As for the topic, might want to check for some form of plagiarism. I've read something eerily similar during his last trial for child molestation on
how he's just a poor guy hammered by the world and extorted.