Was Michael Jackson Framed? by Mary A. Fischer GQ magazine , page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 59 times


reply posted on 28-6-2009 @ 10:24 AM by silo13


As you may already know, after my tour ended I remained out of the country [US] undergoing treatment for a dependency on pain medication...There have been many disgusting statements made recently concerning allegations of improper conduct on my part. These statements about me are totally false...I will say I am particularly upset by the handling of the mass matter by the incredible, terrible mass media. At every opportunity, the media has dissected and manipulated these allegations to reach their own conclusions. I ask all of you to wait and hear the truth before you label or condemn me. Don't treat me like a criminal, because I am innocent. I have been forced to submit to a dehumanizing and humiliating examination...It was the most humiliating ordeal of my life...But if this is what I have to endure to prove my innocence, my complete innocence, so be it - Michael Jackson


wiki

The search report concluded that there were some strong similarities between Chandler's description and Jackson's body, but there wasn't a definite match.



reply posted on 28-6-2009 @ 11:30 AM by Kr0n0s
Child molestation charges are one of a handful of charges where very little, if any, evidence is needed to bring charges AND to get a conviction.
First off, all it takes is an accusation by a child or the childs parents to get you thrown in jail and if you dont have bail money, youre in there until you go to trial.
Why is that so?
How can law enforcement and the judicial system get away with something like this?
One of my theories is because there of the shock factor associated with any crimes against children, especially this type of crime and we allow LE to get away with it, there are very little objections to the way LE handles molestation charges because nobody wants the stigma of coming to the defense of someone charged with this crime.

Where are the ACLU because once the door is opened a little, it will eventually open all the way.

Many years after my very bitter divorce was finalized, my X-Wife and I became friends again.
One day she told me about a conversation that she had with her lawyer during the custody portion of our divorce case, we were both fighting for custody of both children.
He told her that he could have her case wrapped up in no time if she made some kind of molestation accusations against me, nothing would have to be proved because for the kids "safety" an accusation would be enough to cause the judge to not only give her custody but I would also not be allowed any non-supervised visitations.
Luckily though, despite how bad she despised me at that time, she realized the effect that something like this would have on me and even more so the kids and refused to do it.

When these stories first broke and following the trial, i thought MJ was guilty as hell.
Then I started to look at things from a different perspective , I saw how naive he was and I realized that he was the biggest/easiest target for blackmail and extortion in the country.

Im not a fan of his at all and of course MJ had many stupid practices that definitely hurt his case.
For example, one of his comments was something like this... There is nothing wrong with sharing your bed with children, people do it all over the world without involving a sexual relationship.
Let me just say this, I dont care what culture you come from, at no time is it ok to sleep in the same bed with any child that isnt your own.

This is something the parents said he did on many occasions and MJ even admitted to it, saying there was nothing wrong with it.
Where the hell were the parents at and if the parents knew this was going on, then why did they allow it?
The continued to let these kids go to Never Land overnight, sometimes for multiple nights at a time. Where was the concern then?

As long as MJ was paying the parents rent, paid their bills, bought their groceries and automobiles, the parents had no problems, what so ever.
In fact, it was only after MJ kicked them off the gravy train that they had to come up with another way to get back on it.
The probably thought, why should we stay at this level and have to live by his rules?
We need to come up with a way to get money off of him and NOT live by his rules.
This first case was strange anyway. In almost every occasion that a victim drops charges, especially charges that are this serious, the DA wont allow it to happen and the case will continue, even without the cooperation of the "victim"

And finally, if there was any truth to any these charges in the first case, then how could a parent possibly accept a buy-off over justice against the man that assaulted your own son?
Because it probably didnt happen.


[edit on 6/28/2009 by Kr0n0s]


reply posted on 28-6-2009 @ 01:23 PM by Kr0n0s
reply to post by silo13





I’m continually humbled by the eloquence of some who have a knack for words if a lack of mechanics - yet none the less provide such spirit of words the meaning comes out perfectly beautiful. *Beaming on some posters* On the flip side there‘s some who may have the mechanics right, but completely lack understanding or care for the truth.


I'm not quite following you here.
You dont understand what some of the posters are trying to say?
Or is it mine that you dont understand?



reply posted on 28-6-2009 @ 01:34 PM by silo13
reply to post by Kr0n0s



Thought your post was great.

As for a couple of others, well, I'm not going to get into fights over the opinions people have about this case.

People who still believe Michael is guilty either didn't read the article or are driven by bias so debilitating they couldn't see the truth it jumped out and bit them.

So, in my opinion, people who come to this thread to take cheap shots at Michael Jackson and this fabulous piece of research by Ms. Fischer are just showing their ignorance.

If someone has a valid argument that's another thing all together.

I've yet to see one.

Thanks again for your post.


[edit on 28-6-2009 by silo13]


reply posted on 28-6-2009 @ 03:32 PM by silo13
reply to post by Cygnific



She ask's you to PLEASE spell it as Fischer, and what do you name it in the topic title? Fisher!


(As I posted in my introductory post)

In adherence to ATS rules I've reprinted the article headline intact and unedited. Therein the name of the author is misspelled. Please take note of the correct spelling of Ms. Fischer’s name.

Perfect example of being caught between a rock and a hard place.



[edit on 28-6-2009 by silo13]


reply posted on 28-6-2009 @ 03:37 PM by Cygnific
Originally posted by silo13
reply to
post by Cygnific



She ask's you to PLEASE spell it as Fischer, and what do you name it in the topic title? Fisher!


(As posted in my introdutcion post)

In adherence to ATS rules I've reprinted the article headline intact and unedited. Therein the name of the author is misspelled. Please take note of the correct spelling of Ms. Fischer’s name.





Wow, how could i have missed that It is even right behind it.. Sorry for my mistake..



reply posted on 28-6-2009 @ 03:38 PM by silo13
reply to post by SaraThustra

Either way, unless a whole bunch of those boys grow up and come forward, we will never know.


After millions of dollars were spent by prosecutors and police departments in two jurisdictions, and after two grand juries questioned close to 200 witnesses, including 30 children who knew Jackson, not a single corroborating witness could be found.


Most of those children would be around 26 or more now - to date none have come forward.

You can come to your own conclusions from there.

Thanks for your post

peace


[edit on 28-6-2009 by silo13]


reply posted on 28-6-2009 @ 03:42 PM by silo13
reply to post by Cygnific



Wow, how could i have missed that It is even right behind it.. Sorry for my mistake..


No problem at all - it's all good.

I'll take it up with a MOD and see if I can get it corrected and not get busted out for breaking ATS Rules.

Thanks for reminding me!

EDIT: THANK YOU Skyfloating for the *Fix*


[edit on 28-6-2009 by silo13]


reply posted on 28-6-2009 @ 03:45 PM by Silcone Synapse
Hey Silo13,Glad you getting support for this thread.
I was on the your other thread which led to this one.

The source you quote is well researched,but under exposed IMHO.It should have had much more coverage at the time,but sadly the masses were spoon fed the bogus abuse line instead.
Amazing what the MSM passes of for investigative journalism when compared to the GQ article IMHO.

Scratch the surface,always.
It pays off if you are looking for the truth.
Don't believe the in false veneer of GARBAGE we are so constantly fed by $$hungry MSM fools with agendas they should be totally ashamed of.

Did anyone ever hear about the use of sodium amytal in the MSM?
I sure didn't at the time
Massivley significant if you ask me.
We were fed a selective bowl of stinking filth by rotten to the core corporate interests.
AS PER USUAL.

Ronishia said it well earlier in the thread:
i have done a load of research into the mj cases etc and of the firm belief that he didn't do it, anyone that still calls him a child molester don't have the facts of the cases, the happenings both b4 and afterwards and are just going on media bravado and follow it like sheep. this man was pushed and persecuted not only by an over bearing father but by hangers on who leeched of him for all he was worth. Imagine what it would be like to be that rich and surrounded by all those people and yet feel so alone in this world,i have done a load of research into the mj cases etc and of the firm belief that he didn't do it, anyone that still calls him a child molester don't have the facts of the cases, the happenings both b4 and afterwards and are just going on media bravado and follow it like sheep. this man was pushed and persecuted not only by an over bearing father but by hangers on who leeched of him for all he was worth. Imagine what it would be like to be that rich and surrounded by all those people and yet feel so alone in this world,


I could not have said it better.
We will not forget you Michael.


reply posted on 28-6-2009 @ 03:49 PM by silo13
reply to post by Silcone Synapse



The source you quote is well researched, but under exposed IMHO.


Agreed!

One reason I feel very fortunate we were allowed to reprint the article in it's entirety here on ATS.

I so hope it goes *viral* as they say.

The more people post to blogs, etc, the better.

Thanks again
gracie


reply posted on 28-6-2009 @ 04:00 PM by Cygnific
reply to post by ronishia



I ment for him it doesn't matter anymore. It is to late for that. (I'm sure his family knows the truth) Even if he was framed, some people will always believe it was true. If he was framed though, i hope they get life time prison. This is to destructive for people (some even commit suicide for this) who get wrongly accused to get away with so easely.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 17 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 13 days ago with 122 member flags
STOP....Take a STEP BACK....and look at the BIG PICTURE!!
  Posted 19 days ago with 115 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 18 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 15 hours ago, 112 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 11 hours ago, 96 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 9 hours ago, 62 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 6 hours ago, 58 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 13 hours ago, 50 replies