Hello, I'm glad you responded to this.
I always welcome all points of view in every manner, afterall all sides of the fence must be thouroghly
examined by every angle when looking into the paranormal. Unfortunately, you cannot prove it's false, just as I cannot prove it's true. What we have here, is a matter of perspective. Naturally, "skeptic.com" and "skeptico.blog.com" is going to have a different "skeptic" view on the matter and there is a large possibility that Wikipedias' defenition of "what the bleep!" is, was written by a "skeptic", which is AWESOME. However, it's all just a matter of perspective. You cannot disprove Mrs. Pert just on the basis that someone says its "Likely" the pilgrims just didn't figure the pilgrims as a threat as it's "likely" the person who analyzed that was a "skeptic". The *fact* is, that we most likely will never know unless we were to be able to actually interview the captain himself, which is extemely "un-likely".
What *is* "likely" however, is that we are back to square one.
[edit on 30-6-2009 by Wookiep]
[edit on 30-6-2009 by Wookiep]


Please do that venting
elsewhere.

