It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
reply to post by Fitzgibbon
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
reply to post by Fitzgibbon
Even if they weren't, as long as you're of mature age (varies by jurisdiction), believe in a Supreme Being and are of good moral character, there shouldn't be anything to stop you.
Good moral character! Did I hear you right? Was Aleister Crowley, 33rd and 97 degree freemason,the infamous beast 666 of good moral character? How about Dr Wynn Westcott who was a member of the Order Of The Golden Dawn? Or how about Helen Blavatsky who wrote, "Satan is the god of our planet and the only god. Lucifer represents life, thought, progress, civilisation, liberty, independance. Lucifer is the logos, the serpent, the saviour.
Seems to me that while modern day masons naively believe that when Pike referred to Lucifer he was not talking about Satan, Blavatsky was under no delusion what masons meant when they mentioned Lucifer. She was talking about the only god (as far as she was concerned). The one true supreme being. . . Mind you that fits in well with the masonic belief in a supreme being doesn't it?
If these are your ideas of people with "good moral character" then I'll pass if you don't mind.
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by Mintwithahole.
please read this
when you are presenting information as fact, please make sure they are indeed facts.
Thanks and have a nice day.
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
reply to post by Mintwithahole.
Why don't you read it more closely? Crowley wanted to be a mason because he agreed with it's beliefs.
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
reply to post by Fitzgibbon
As usual you're entirely missing the point. Crowley wanted, and thought, he was a mason. The fact he wasn't doesn't come into it! He wanted to be a mason because he fealt that they, you, shared his beliefs and views. Do you like being compared to the Beast 666? Because let me tell you if he was alive today he would feel that you as a mason would be ideal company to pass away those long winter evenings with.
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by Mintwithahole.
so you posted information that he was a 33rd and 97th degree Freemason, and when provided with the facts that he was not a Freemason at all, you say that because he wanted to be one, freemasonry is evil? For real? That is a silly argument. What freemasonry stand for and is about is in print all over the internet. And even in some books. (they used to be the way we got information) It has nothing to do with Satan, Lucifer, or any other bad man. It is about God. Whomever your God is. You had a better argument with "some masons in the past were racists."
Honestly? Sure. Why not. I've never seen a shred of evidence that he actually did anything "evil". Was he a blowhard? an egoist? Sure. Did he roast babies in his basement and serve them with tea? I've seen no proof of such allegations.
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
Do you like being compared to the Beast 666?
...
The Beast 666 agreed with your beliefs. Surely you can't be proud of that. . . can you?
Originally posted by network dude
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
reply to post by Fitzgibbon
As usual you're entirely missing the point. Crowley wanted, and thought, he was a mason. The fact he wasn't doesn't come into it! He wanted to be a mason because he fealt that they, you, shared his beliefs and views. Do you like being compared to the Beast 666? Because let me tell you if he was alive today he would feel that you as a mason would be ideal company to pass away those long winter evenings with.
so If Ted Bundy thought you were a cool cat because of the way you talk on the internet, that would make you a mass murderer right? Logic, it's a killer when used to fight untruths.
Originally posted by JoshNorton
Honestly? Sure. Why not. I've never seen a shred of evidence that he actually did anything "evil". Was he a blowhard? an egoist? Sure. Did he roast babies in his basement and serve them with tea? I've seen no proof of such allegations.
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
Do you like being compared to the Beast 666?
...
The Beast 666 agreed with your beliefs. Surely you can't be proud of that. . . can you?
[edit on 7/20/2009 by JoshNorton]
Can you show any evidence of a Mason here on ATS purposefully telling a lie?
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
Congratulations. A mason who can actually tell the truth and give an honest answer. A rarity indeed. . .
Originally posted by network dude
Originally posted by Majestic23
Quit being so slow. America is the new Roman Empire, look at Augustus' avatar.
And there you have it sports fans. the leader of the NWO has been found. No further searching is needed. And to think that he was here all this time. he was even listening to our conversations!
Oh, Augustus, leader of the NWO, please don't invoke your wrath on the poor souls at ATS!
Originally posted by network dude Majestic23, just for future reference, if you ask a person a question and they give you their answer to that question, they did their part.
Originally posted by network dudeWeather or not you believe that answer is completely up to you, but thinking that you know all the answers, why ask questions at all?
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by Mintwithahole.
It has nothing to do with Satan, Lucifer, or any other bad man. It is about God. Whomever your God is. You had a better argument with "some masons in the past were racists."
[edit on 20-7-2009 by network dude]
Originally posted by JoshNorton
Can you show any evidence of a Mason here on ATS purposefully telling a lie?
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
Congratulations. A mason who can actually tell the truth and give an honest answer. A rarity indeed. . .
Originally posted by letthereaderunderstand
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by Mintwithahole.
It has nothing to do with Satan, Lucifer, or any other bad man. It is about God. Whomever your God is. You had a better argument with "some masons in the past were racists."
[edit on 20-7-2009 by network dude]
So, if one holds Satan as God, then this is acceptable to Masonry?
This always made me think.
"There has never been a war fought in the name of Satan"...
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
reply to post by Fitzgibbon
As usual you're entirely missing the point. Crowley wanted, and thought, he was a mason.