It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Perfect Landing ... cannot be debunked!!!

page: 2
6
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by peacejet

Oh man, this is the first time I quoted myself.


Such is the inevitable consequence of self delusion.




posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:24 AM
link   
After extensive research I must retract my previous claim of CGI.


The probability of the Dumbo Jet has been increased by the discovery of it's propulsion system.


The Wankel Motor:



Completely improbable but has an awesome name



Here's to the pioneer of the Dumbo Jet:




posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:25 AM
link   
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


You still didnt disprove; even defend what I said.

So, the conclusion is that this dumbojet has been debunked and concluded as a "dumbo"jet.


Where is my applause?



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:29 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


Where is the intake?

Where is the fuel tank?

Where is the combustion chamber?

Where is the cooling systems?

Where are the fuel lines?

Where is the exhaust?




posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:33 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


You sir are a gentleman and a soul wise beyond his pre-pubescent allure.
That is to say I admire you ...

It is a rare virtue that a man of relatively considerable intellect has the courage and temerity to let go of his self induced indoctrination and embrace the truth before them. Sure the emasculation is extreme, but will only manifest itself as a short term state of depression eventually resulting in a falsely premised sense of conceptualized improvement.


Still ...

If only our 'friend' had the courage to deconstruct himself to that glorious end.


[edit on 28 Jun 2009 by schrodingers dog]



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by peacejet

Where is the intake?


Trunk



Where is the fuel tank?


Bladder



Where is the combustion chamber?


Colon



Where is the cooling systems?


Ears



Where are the fuel lines?


Arteries



Where is the exhaust?


I think you know where that is







[edit on 28/6/09 by Chadwickus]



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:39 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


What fuel does it use?



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:40 AM
link   
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


Excellent, you have been fooled to believe I am now on your side.

Phase 2 of my plan to discredit you and your Dumbo Jet has begun.


Muahahha.




....Wait did I just say that aloud??? :bnghd:

[edit on 28/6/09 by Chadwickus]



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:41 AM
link   
reply to post by peacejet
 


PJ, even internos couldn't debunk this.

He's in his sardinian basement eating mozzarella whilst weeping at the prospect ...

Just admit you are vanquished and move on.



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:42 AM
link   
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


I never lose.

I never give up.

I fight to death.



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:43 AM
link   
reply to post by peacejet
 


PEANUTS!

HIYOO!




posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by peacejet
 

PEANUTS!



Just as the shape of the Wankel combustion chamber is resistant to preignition and will run on lower-octane gasoline than a comparable piston engine,[20], it also leads to relatively incomplete combustion of the air-fuel charge, with a larger amount of unburned hydrocarbons released into the exhaust. The exhaust is, however, relatively low in NOx emissions; this allowed Mazda to meet the United States Clean Air Act of 1970 in 1973 with a simple and inexpensive 'thermal reactor' (an enlarged open chamber in the exhaust manifold) by paradoxically enriching the air-fuel ratio to the point where the unburned hydrocarbons in the exhaust would support complete combustion in the thermal reactor; while piston-engine cars required expensive catalytic converters to deal with both unburned hydrocarbons and NOx emissions. This raised fuel consumption, however (already a weak point for the Wankel engine) at the same time that the oil crisis of 1973 raised the price of gasoline. Mazda was able to improve the fuel efficiency of the thermal reactor system by 40% by the time of introduction of the RX-7 in 1978, but eventually shifted to the catalytic converter system.[21]

In Mazda's RX-8 with the Renesis engine, fuel consumption is now within normal limits while passing California State emissions requirements. The exhaust ports, which in earlier Mazda rotaries were located in the rotor housings, were moved to the sides of the combustion chamber. This approach allowed Mazda to eliminate overlap between intake and exhaust port openings, while simultaneously increasing exhaust port area. The Renesis engine even meets California's Low Emissions Vehicle or LEV standards.


Wankel engine

See the contradiction.




posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:49 AM
link   
reply to post by peacejet
 


No contradictions my dear friend.

www.renewableenergyworld.com...


Peanut oil first came into prominence during World War II as a replacement for scarce fossil fuel-based oils and lubricants. With domestic fuel prices at record levels, it is not surprising that scientists are again looking at peanut oil as a fuel alternative.





posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:52 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


You didnt say peanut oil. You said peanuts. Both are different things. And moreover can you show me the crankshaft and the pistons please?



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:54 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


Chad, we must token gesture pj ...

We've led him to the water, I guess he's just not thirsty.



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:55 AM
link   
reply to post by peacejet
 


That's the magic of the Wankel!

It's one giant piston!

GO TEAM DUMBO!



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:57 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


Proof(photo of the internal piston or even the engine manufacturing process) or it didnt happen.



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 05:02 AM
link   
reply to post by peacejet
 


I don't need to show proof.

You're just gonna have to take my word for it



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 05:06 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


You have become the average guy. You ask me to just believe you. But I am not the average person. I need proof.



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 05:34 AM
link   
reply to post by peacejet
 


Then you will never be one with the Dumbo.

:shk:





new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join