It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Perfect Landing ... cannot be debunked!!!

page: 1
6
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 27 2009 @ 06:53 PM
link   
I have flown dumbo jets before but seldom do they make such a smooth landing ...



Cool commercial for a worthy cause.




[edit on 27 Jun 2009 by schrodingers dog]




posted on Jun, 27 2009 @ 07:07 PM
link   
Cool Commercial


for a change......

nice find.



posted on Jun, 27 2009 @ 07:43 PM
link   
A well made ad.

With a message.

Two thumbs up!

*stretches flag finger*

jeeze haven't used it in a while, it's a bit slow.........




posted on Jun, 27 2009 @ 07:44 PM
link   
tis truly an interesting find, great stfuff S and F'd. Cant wait for the debunkers to come out now!!! WHere are they...c if they can disprove this baby!



posted on Jun, 27 2009 @ 07:52 PM
link   
reply to post by zazzafrazz
 


Clearly CGI, as you can see by the way the elephant lands. There clearly should be more momentum.

Go to any airport and watch a Dumbo land to see for yourself.





posted on Jun, 27 2009 @ 07:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by zazzafrazz
 


Clearly CGI, as you can see by the way the elephant lands.


See ... this is typical of the sort of deflection and disinfo I have come to expect by so called "debunkers" such as yourself.


Oh how I weep for the enveloping sadness that surrounds your disbelieving soul!


This is concrete proof ...

Internos himself could not debunk it!!!

There I said it.





posted on Jun, 27 2009 @ 07:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


WHy dont you go to H....with all your debunking you creep!!!!
Clearly this is real, its not CGI, PROOOVE IT, go on, I challenge you to prove it
show me how its cgi!
If you care to look left of the elephant at 9 seconds you CLEARLY see a MOthership escort . Its the same one as from the ISS feed.
You skeptic people make me sick


[edit on 27-6-2009 by zazzafrazz]



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 03:00 AM
link   
All i could think of was the dumbo crows! thats a cool commercial.




posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 03:09 AM
link   
reply to post by W3RLIED2
 


The video you just posted is obviously a fake.


Debunk Fail!!!




posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 03:18 AM
link   
Its graphics. If you observe the video closely, you will realise that the elephant is flying without any power. You can say it uses its big ears for glide power. But the ears are not extended which gives a glide ratio of 0:0 . :shk:



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 03:25 AM
link   
reply to post by peacejet
 


You know, it is really sad when this happens.


You, as per usual, haven't taken into account the conservation of angular momentum principle.


Typical of so called 'debunkers' to count on the ignorance of the populace ...

Well not this time!

Angular momentum!!!

There, I said it!



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 03:28 AM
link   
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


Dude, the thing is. If you consider angular momentum, then the elephant should have been rotating about a point. But the elephant is doing an straight-in imaginary ILS(which means that it is coming in a straight line). So, the only possibility is an hyperbolic trajectory.



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 03:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by peacejet
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


Dude, the thing is. If you consider angular momentum, then the elephant should have been rotating about a point.


See, that just shows how unfamiliar you are with proboscular propulsion.

Thankfully however, I am versed in elephantidae aerodynamics.
Angular momentum is the means by which dumbo jets generate the necessary vitesse to glide into their chosen destination. As such it would be observed during takeoff and not whilst landing.
Again, your disinfo is transparent.



But the elephant is doing an straight-in imaginary ILS(which means that it is coming in a straight line).


How do you expect her to land? (yes it's a her)




So, the only possibility is an hyperbolic trajectory.


As well you know, hyperbolic trajectory applies to celestial mechanics and is not relevant to interozonal elephant propulsion.


Now, will you stop the deflection and concede that dumbo jets are real?



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 03:46 AM
link   
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


What is the glide ratio of the dumbojet?



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 03:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by peacejet
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


What is the glide ratio of the dumbojet?


See that is microcosmetic crystallization of the whole problem with heretics ...

Do you really expect me to provide you with facts that you will distort to fit your disbelieving heart?




posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 03:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by schrodingers dog
Angular momentum is the means by which dumbo jets generate the necessary vitesse to glide into their chosen destination.


Okay.


As such it would be observed during takeoff and not whilst landing.


Let it be.

Lets see what you stated again. You said that the dumbo jet uses the angular momentum to take off.

Here's the image from the wiki link.



If you see closely, if at any point the object is released, it will not follow an straight line trajectory. It will follow an hyperbolic trajectory because it is not restricted to a common center once it is released.

So, the dumbojet must approach with an runway offset equal to the eccentricity.


As well you know, hyperbolic trajectory applies to celestial mechanics and is not relevant to interozonal elephant propulsion.



Not necessarily.


It applies to planetary slingshotting and other things as well.:bash:



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by peacejet

Okay.


Thank you for conceding the point. I know it's not easy to capitulate when confronted with the painful yet liberating truth.



Let it be.


Once again, surrendering to the soul crushing truth, though painful in the short term, will yield recompense for thee in the long run.



So, the dumbojet must approach with an runway offset equal to the eccentricity.


That goes without saying ... or are you now contesting gravity?



Not necessarily.


It applies to planetary slingshotting and other things as well.:bash:


Planetary slingshooting IS celestial mechanics ...

Unless Uranus just flew through our atmosphere.


PJ, just let it go and concede that you're wrong ...

Resistance is Chadwickyle!


[edit on 28 Jun 2009 by schrodingers dog]



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:07 AM
link   
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


Disprove my point first




posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by peacejet
reply to post by schrodingers dog
 


Disprove my point first



If u had 1 I would!


Also, my responsibility to provide the undebunkable evidence ...

It's your job to disprove it! :bash:



posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 04:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by peacejet

Let it be.

Lets see what you stated again. You said that the dumbo jet uses the angular momentum to take off.

Here's the image from the wiki link.



If you see closely, if at any point the object is released, it will not follow an straight line trajectory. It will follow an hyperbolic trajectory because it is not restricted to a common center once it is released.

So, the dumbojet must approach with an runway offset equal to the eccentricity.


As well you know, hyperbolic trajectory applies to celestial mechanics and is not relevant to interozonal elephant propulsion.



Not necessarily.


It applies to planetary slingshotting and other things as well.:bash:


This is my point.

Oh man, this is the first time I quoted myself.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join