It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mattifikation If you say you want to kill your boss, for example... That's not a crime.
Originally posted by mattifikation
Just because the victim doesn't find out - and in this case, the victim's father found the images - doesn't mean they are not a victim. Those little girls were the victims of what he did, regardless of how prematurely slutty your own underage friends may be. And for the record, just because a 12 year old has urges, it doesn't mean that they are capable of making decisions about sex on their own. That's precisely why they are not legally allowed to. If you're suggesting otherwise, you are incredibly out of touch with reality even for a 17 year old.
RCW 9A.44.073
Rape of a child in the first degree.
(1) A person is guilty of rape of a child in the first degree when the person has sexual intercourse with another who is less than twelve years old and not married to the perpetrator and the perpetrator is at least twenty-four months older than the victim.
apps.leg.wa.gov...
The age of consent was 12 for a girl, 14 for a boy, [in early 1600 England], but for most children puberty came two or three years later than it does today.
internetshakespeare.uvic.ca...
The girl’s father, a friend of the suspect, had provided investigators with “pictures that he found inside the (Campbell) residence of his daughter, including a picture of his bed where someone had taken a picture of his daughter’s panties,” and reported that he had seen more photos on Campbell’s camera.
Originally posted by mattifikation
reply to post by Xtraeme
So you're saying that sometimes, under the right circumstances, in the right time and the right place, and with the right 12 year old, it's totally cool because she might be mature enough and she might die soon?
It sounds like your argument sort of amounts to, "If there's grass on the field, play ball."
Originally posted by mattifikation
Let's shed some more light on the case to see who's right, shall we?
Child Porn Charges Against Michael W. Campbell Bound Over To Grand Jury
The girl’s father, a friend of the suspect, had provided investigators with “pictures that he found inside the (Campbell) residence of his daughter, including a picture of his bed where someone had taken a picture of his daughter’s panties,” and reported that he had seen more photos on Campbell’s camera.
Child Porn Charges Against Michael W. Campbell Bound Over To Grand Jury
... I really hope this additional information lays the debate to rest.