It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Warnings From The Benevolents!

page: 333
334
<< 330  331  332    334  335  336 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 04:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Beamish
reply to post by Unity_99
 



I kept asking the one I was writing to…what is so dangerous about a free mind? Why is there so much control and such a need to put certain seeds in…he was trying to fob off pseudo ufology on me along…and using words…as a friend who was discussing conspiracies…with a very analytical methodology. The word that made me confront the issue head on was, when he said, that was merely conjecture and I said only fbi types would use that term.


That single word made you believe that he was FBI?

Unity_99, with all due respect, anyone can use the word “conjecture” when it comes to the discussion of Ufology, as there is no solid, irrefutable proof as to what Ufos are.

That is a fact.

Up until there is real, examinable verification, the word conjecture is perfectly applicable to the subject. And it doesn’t make anyone a government agent to use it.

I hate to say this, but you admitting to this makes you sound terribly paranoid and that isn’t helping your cause at all.

And as to your saying he used psuedo-ufology; how do you quantify that? What makes you so sure his opinion or approach used pretence? (I consider ET_MAN’s approach to the subject hugely artificial, not to mention imaginary, and I can guarantee that many others will feel the same, but that does not mean that we are all - or any of us - on the “Dark Side”.)

If your answer is that you read his “energy” then I am at a loss as to know what to say to you.

Why? Because your saying you can gauge a persons intent by their “energy” is – I’m afraid – conjectural at best, inadmissible at worst, and the most disturbing thing is you don’t see that.

I am not a nasty person or a serial, hard-nosed skeptic, despite what anyone may think, and even though this may be over stepping the bounds of this thread, I have to say that I am worried about you.

Take that how you will, but it’s the truth.
I agree on most things you've said. I too,as of late,am growing really worried about Unity_99 and a touch of pananoia isn't off the table either. I would say to her to take it easy,relax and try to take infromation with more calm,not get so agitated about it all. The word conjecture is used by many in many cases.Has ntohing to do with fbi etc.

peace in




posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 05:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by Beamish
 


One thing I won't share with him is the energy bouncing off him, because I read energy and placed a certain energy, so a certain group, world wide apparently.
Share it with us then, if you won't share it with him. You post on this thread non-stop anyway,so might as well answer these questions and share with us who are still here,most of whom await october 11 and what happens to this thread thereafter.


Note to him: you asked how I knew, for your assessment report, I gather, lol.

You wouldnt let up and kept pushing in a negative way, ideas at me that I reject and will never accept, and was very aggressive at doing so. So the flaw would be thoroughly annoying someone and getting their backbone up enough to bring up what they thought. Aggressive persistance to push agenda
you keep saying ''you'' then "him". This sentence especially is weird> "You wouldnt let up and kept pushing in a negative way, ideas at me that I reject and will never accept, and was very aggressive at doing so'' - started out as YOU and ended up as "WAS very agressive,as in HIM" So within the same sentence chaging ''you'' to ''him'' in one trai nof thought seems to imply something.
Why would you use the "Note to him ?" words? Are you saying he reads this thread? Do we know this user ? Or os it all a words to the sky approach,without him actually reading the note ?



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 05:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by LeoVirgo
reply to post by Unity_99
 


You say you dont like control...but yet you also refuses to support others thinking for themselves if it disagrees with what you understand. You say to others to come out of the box....but yet you set another trap for them in the end
when one contemplates what you have said here...and looks back at many posts by Unity...one realzies that there is much truth in what you speak Leo Virgo. I thank you for your view of it.I share it in many layers.Unknowingly, by saying to not be fooled,to discern for themselves,and then going further and saying the way I THINK is the ONLY TRUE WAY..makes it all hypocrycy,changing boxes. You sitll have no freedom to chooce for yourself, only what she says can be the right TRUE way.

Sad really,limiting.
Live,and let Live I say.

ALWAYS DISCERN AND CHOOCE YOURSELF.Don't follow peoples visions or truths.
edit on 10/7/2011 by Valeri because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 06:13 AM
link   
reply to post by Unity_99
 



No, and he isn't FBI, that is US.


Sorry, but that doesn’t make any sense. Do you mean he was us, or US, as in United States? Either way, I am at a loss as to what you mean.

And I’m really sorry to say this but that applies to most of what you are writing.

I don’t mean that in a derogatory sense, but it is becoming clear that you are engaged in a very personal, extremely focused, internal dialogue. And it worries me.

But it doesn’t worry me half as much as this comment (emphasis added):


That one word frustrated me enough to just bring up what I was suspecting for some time. I'd had enough. And the rest of the conversation is no one's business. Oh and after he was writing again, and I was "wandering off topic" in his mind, being told to get back on assignment really put my nose out of joint. I was like And then the idea came, hmmmm... is there a check coming in the mail then?


I am not a psychoanalyst. I am not a psychotherapist. I am not qualified to evaluate anyone’s psyche through the evidence of the written word in any way, shape or form. However, that paragraph above put shivers down my spine, because there is so much one can read into it.

Even though you did brush off that conversation as yet another episode of encountering “bad energy”, I don’t know how to put this without sounding like a hopelessly suspicious conspiracy theorist…or paranoid. Sheesh…

If – and I dearly hope this is the case – you have not put across what you were trying to say correctly, (and if that’s the case, then you – and everyone else – should ignore what I’m about to say) then you need to re-read that quote and see it for what it could suggest.

That paragraph sounds suspiciously like you had a moment of clarity – a moment of freedom, of free-thought if you will – whilst talking to someone who is trying to, and still could be along with others, direct your thoughts towards a specific agenda.


He's only one, the list of what I supsect is a lot bigger. Control is the thing I note the most. And put downs.


Without giving names, are there any others you talk to – in real life – who skirt around the same sort of subject? Ones who might cajole you, or try and “put you down”, even in a humorous manner, when you say something that they don’t agree with?


No one is ever going to control me.


Are you sure about that? Really sure?

How do you measure control?

Yes, this is off-topic.

Yes, it’s probably a dumb thing to say.

But when you use phrases such as “wandering off topic” and “get back on assignment” in relation to someone else’s comments to you, then it does ring alarm bells…

I think I need time away from all these shenanigans…

Edit to add:

I starred all three of Valeri's posts directed to you, Unity_99, as they were written in the same spirit as mine; compassion for another Human being.

I think you need to read them carefully, and maybe consider why they were written with an open mind before dismissing them.

edit on 7-10-2011 by Beamish because: additional content



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 06:49 AM
link   
Have you always had full knowledge of "who" or "what" you are, where you come from, and the future that you have seen. Or, was this also slowly revealed to you during the course of your lifetime?



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 06:52 AM
link   
reply to post by followtheevidence
 


Who are you asking?

If you're asking ET_MAN, then you are wasting your time as he has left the thread.



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 10:42 AM
link   
Val, hopefully you can stop sending me negative links, when they're not my cup of tea.


edit on 7-10-2011 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 11:05 AM
link   
((((((Unity))))))

S L O W D O W N....not everyone is out to "get" you. You need to B R E A T H E...
edit on 7-10-2011 by Destinyone because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 11:20 AM
link   
reply to post by Destinyone
 


There is a lot more to this than I will say here. But thanks. Peace and Love.



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 11:38 AM
link   
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Avoid The Mind Traps/Pens!!!! Dandelions Are Free!!!!

www.abovetopsecret.com...
The Journey Over The Rainbow, Draw Forth Your Light,



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 12:24 PM
link   
Well I don't see any doom happening. I see no comet in the sky, no second Sun, "You will see many disasters before October 11, 2011 that will be undeniable" bull____. God in Heaven.

To be saved all you need do is call on the name Jesus, is that so hard. Over 300 pages of Psychobable.

I will start the party here. I'm the Scatman:
get happy people....


Ladies and Gentlemen, step right up: Welcome to the show indeed.



edit on 7-10-2011 by chloe4412 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 01:03 PM
link   
KABLOWIE!!!!!! LOL!!!!

And the 2012 stuff is Mountain Oysters too!!!


I will believe none of it any longer.


Two years, Really? He must be laughing his head off by now seeing what he's created. These people are pure paranoid Scitzo's, some of you, not all. Some on here knew it all along and kudos to ya.

People who want to show their a@@ take their pants down and let's all look is what I say. Rock on...

I'm done now. Have fun in Doomland folks.



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 03:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Unity_99
 


Unity_99, again I ask you: where are you going to be on October 11th and what are you going to do?



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 03:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by chloe4412
KABLOWIE!!!!!! LOL!!!!

And the 2012 stuff is Mountain Oysters too!!!


I will believe none of it any longer.


Two years, Really? He must be laughing his head off by now seeing what he's created. These people are pure paranoid Scitzo's, some of you, not all. Some on here knew it all along and kudos to ya.

People who want to show their a@@ take their pants down and let's all look is what I say. Rock on...

I'm done now. Have fun in Doomland folks.


No need to gloat Chloe ! I noticed with regards to 2012, you say " I will believe none of it any longer", which means you were a "doomlander" once. People in glass houses shouldnt split hairs... or whatever,



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 06:07 PM
link   
I wonder what people would have to be afraid of if there wasn't You tube
So many nut jobs get a idea in their head and feel the need to broadcast it to the world.
just look at the percentages of the many whom have made prediction vids and have failed.
I could use the girl (narnia) that stated Elenin was the earthquake generator..nothing has come from
that one. people that had made predictions that Rome was gonna be destroyed a month ago or so,.
that didnt happen either..
the Point here is, Use You tube for cooking ideas or gardening tips instead of believing someones
off the wall preachings.. as it has proven time and time again to be wrong.



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 06:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
I wonder what people would have to be afraid of if there wasn't You tube
So many nut jobs get a idea in their head and feel the need to broadcast it to the world.
just look at the percentages of the many whom have made prediction vids and have failed.
I could use the girl (narnia) that stated Elenin was the earthquake generator..nothing has come from
that one. people that had made predictions that Rome was gonna be destroyed a month ago or so,.
that didnt happen either..
the Point here is, Use You tube for cooking ideas or gardening tips instead of believing someones
off the wall preachings.. as it has proven time and time again to be wrong.


I completely agree with you, I never watch youtube links id rather see a transcript, unfortunatly this means that ive missed about 50% of the content of Unitys threads (no offence).
Your right, its not a reliable source for the topics that we discuss here.



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 06:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by thedoctorswife

Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
I wonder what people would have to be afraid of if there wasn't You tube
So many nut jobs get a idea in their head and feel the need to broadcast it to the world.
just look at the percentages of the many whom have made prediction vids and have failed.
I could use the girl (narnia) that stated Elenin was the earthquake generator..nothing has come from
that one. people that had made predictions that Rome was gonna be destroyed a month ago or so,.
that didnt happen either..
the Point here is, Use You tube for cooking ideas or gardening tips instead of believing someones
off the wall preachings.. as it has proven time and time again to be wrong.


I completely agree with you, I never watch youtube links id rather see a transcript, unfortunatly this means that ive missed about 50% of the content of Unitys threads (no offence).
Your right, its not a reliable source for the topics that we discuss here.
Yes
and it has been used as a reference from the beginning of the thread.
I have seen some of the vids like some that talk about the fictional planet X
after watching the vid , of which someone spent a great deal of time creating a quality show
ended up just trying to sell a book.. Kinda funny how that works..



posted on Oct, 7 2011 @ 06:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Lil Drummerboy
 
Yes I can honestly say ive not watched any of the youtube videos on this thread, even though ive read most of it, and then things started to get really weird with photographs of unitys roof, ( im not being unkind it was just bizarre).



posted on Oct, 8 2011 @ 02:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by Beamish
reply to post by followtheevidence
 


Who are you asking?

If you're asking ET_MAN, then you are wasting your time as he has left the thread.



Yup and thanks for the heads up.



posted on Oct, 8 2011 @ 02:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by redgy
for anyone who may hold the answer,

if infinity does exist, why would a loving higher power send a soul to eternal damnation for the wrongs commited in this miniscule point of life we now experience, is there no time, where there is no time for a soul in finding this requirement of love and righteousness for a chance at life in everlasting heaven.

peace.



The doctrine of "eternal conscious torment" or "eternal hellfire" is a HERETICAL and erroneous doctrine. It is not consistent with the character or plan of God as revealed in Scripture. This "doctrine" stands in stark contrast to Scripture logically, theologically, and literally. I have written two very extensive essays on the matter which I would love to share with you if you are interested.

In short, there is no eternal burning hellfire. There is a temporal hell that is eternal in consequence, not duration. It will be the place where the destruction of souls who have rejected the one true living God takes place. Much more to add if anyone is interested. Tho, it is a bit off topic so I'll end it there.



new topics

top topics



 
334
<< 330  331  332    334  335  336 >>

log in

join