Obama: Community service is a national duty, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 16 times


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 03:38 PM by Rams59lb
reply to post by Aggie Man



Okay, now it's clear where we honestly disagree! it doesn't matter here today weather you are right or if I am but what is obvious is that you are that % of America that is fully okay with our local and federal governments raising our children (helping out as you see it) instead of putting in the time yourself no matter the cost. Hmm. Okay. I understand and believe along with many others in my high % of peeps that it is not the job what so ever of the government stated in the bill of rights and the constitution to hlep me one bit. That we all have choices and I choice to except a job that pays me well enough to support my family, allow me the time off I need to parent my children myself and to volenteer our time as a family instead of looking to others within our government for help...

Okay, we agree to disagree. Now go, fly, get more sheeple to register before you miss your quota for the day and enjoy the freedoms I fought for during desert storm and my taxes that I'm sure you've dipped into now and again.


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 04:19 PM by jibeho
Originally posted by Aggie Man
reply to
post by jibeho



I suppose you are also one of those parents that doesn't want schools/government teaching your children about birth control, evolution and other such "sensitive issues" that the right-wingers get up in arms about. If you fall in that category, then fine..send your kids to a private learning institution where they will be taught that kind of narrow mindedness. That is all we need...another generation of religions fanatics.




Nice uneducated and unfounded response. Generalize much? Let me generalize about you. You haven't read either bill yet. You don't have kids and you live in your parents basement.


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 04:42 PM by Psynarchist
Why doesn't he ask this guy to chip in 20% of his wealth?

I mean, he'd still have 8.8 Billion all for himself,
and Mr. "Change We Can Believe In"
would be able to inject 2.2 Billion into his admirable and noble causes...

Why do We 'The Robbed' People have to roll up our sleeves even more?


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 04:46 PM by jibeho
reply to post by Psynarchist



Ha ha Soros is to busy stumping and spending for the Obamacare campaign. The man has tremendous thumbs. He can fit every pinhead moonbat under them while still controlling the puppet strings with his remaining digits.


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 04:47 PM by Aggie Man
reply to post by jibeho



If they had used the word "focusing" instead of "targeting" would you be OK with it? is it just the language used? Because, I think the "disadvantaged" children would benefit from this the most. Disadvantaged children from poor neighborhoods or disadvantaged in the sense of no real parenting...these kids need positivity in their life. And if recruiting them for community service, which WOULD provide benefit to them....Well, that's a good thing. Otherwise, the criminal element is much more likely to continue on into the next generation of "disadvantaged" kids.


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 04:49 PM by Totakeke
reply to post by Aggie Man



Who decided it would benefit them? Do they get a say in it? Do you think they like being singled out because the government considers them "disadvantaged"? No. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.

[edit on 26-6-2009 by Totakeke]


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 04:52 PM by jibeho
Originally posted by Aggie Man
reply to
post by jibeho



If they had used the word "focusing" instead of "targeting" would you be OK with it? is it just the language used? Because, I think the "disadvantaged" children would benefit from this the most. Disadvantaged children from poor neighborhoods or disadvantaged in the sense of no real parenting...these kids need positivity in their life. And if recruiting them for community service, which WOULD provide benefit to them....Well, that's a good thing. Otherwise, the criminal element is much more likely to continue on into the next generation of "disadvantaged" kids.


You didn't read it!! Once again.

(36) DISADVANTAGED YOUTH- The term `disadvantaged youth' includes those youth who are economically disadvantaged and 1 or more of the following:
`(A) Who are out-of-school youth, including out-of-school youth who are unemployed.
`(B) Who are in or aging out of foster care.
`(C) Who have limited English proficiency.
`(D) Who are homeless or who have run away from home.
`(E) Who are at-risk to leave secondary school without a diploma.
`(F) Who are former juvenile offenders or at risk of delinquency.
`(G) Who are individuals with disabilities.



[edit on 26-6-2009 by jibeho]


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 04:54 PM by Aggie Man
Originally posted by Totakeke
reply to
post by Aggie Man



Who decided it would benefit them? Do they get a say in it? Do you think they like being singled out because the government considers them "disadvantaged"? No. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.

[edit on 26-6-2009 by Totakeke]


Again, you continue to stand on the position that ANY of this is forced. Again, I ask you to provide documentation that this would be forced. Again, you can't. Please learn the difference between voluntary vs. forced servitude. There is a tremendous difference.

And, I agree with you...if you want to volunteer then do so, but if you don't want to then you shouldn't have to....but nowhere has it been (even implied) that there will be forced volunteerism.


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 04:57 PM by Aggie Man
reply to post by jibeho



yes, I have read it....just because I did not give an all encompassing definition of disadvantaged does not mean I did not read it. AND...every politico socioeconomically disadvantaged youth you specifically listed....well, tell me one single one of those segments of the population that would not benefit from an incentive based community volunteer program.


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 04:59 PM by Totakeke
reply to post by Aggie Man



Who are you to decide what is and isn't good for certain people?


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 05:00 PM by Jerk_Idiot
Forget PC. Most people in this country are stupid, ignorant, and uneducated, including those that have gone to college. That includes police, judges, lawyers, and doctors. People get sued over BS, taken in by the police for breaking laws that do not exist, given orders that are against the law by the judges that are supposed to know the law, the list goes on and on. You have people in management at what is supposed to be one of the most intelligent organizations in the world saying that KNOWLEDGE and PROCEDURES that are REQUIRED to be followed or you lose your job, forget the literally BILLIONS of dollars that it could cost the U.S., should be common knowledge and not be written down. Passed on by word of mouth. Business's that require people to work overtime for free and people who will do it because THEY ARE LUCKY TO HAVE A JOB. Stupidity all around. Than you want to FORCE all these people together to work together for whatever reason? Talk about a recipe for disaster!

Most people I know stay away from as many people as possible except for limited situations such as a occassional party or church for this very reason. The only way to stay out of trouble these days is to stay AWAY from people on a general basis. You can see on these threads how uncivil people are to each other. Put everyone who has answered this thread in the same room and what do you think would happen?

So why do it? Possibly to identify those who will not follow authority merely because they are told to. First you identify those who refuse to volunteer. Those that do go to avoid trouble will than be identified when in the group when given stupid, idiotic, asinine orders or who refuse to accept a arbitrary ruling by whoever is made an authority for the volunteers. There you go! You now know who to arrest for the BETTERMENT of the COMMUNITY. They are those that refuse to accept whatever they are ordered to do. As to what will happen to those that stay. Read up on brainwashing methods, coercive pursuasion, scientology methods of control.

Sorry. Been around to long, seen to many things occur to many times.


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 05:03 PM by Aggie Man
Originally posted by Totakeke
reply to
post by Aggie Man



Who are you to decide what is and isn't good for certain people?


No offense, but how old are you? You got to be young...to be so saucy and blatantly misrepresenting what I have said. I didn't say it was good for everyone, and I did say this was VOLUNTARY. So, where did I say that this, or anything else for that matter, is good/bad for any CERTAIN person.

And BTW, who are you to say it isn't good? It's nice how a coin, just like OPINIONS, have 2 sides.


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 05:03 PM by Psynarchist
Originally posted by Aggie Man
reply to
post by jibeho

Disadvantaged children from poor neighborhoods or disadvantaged in the sense of no real parenting...these kids need positivity in their life.


Disadvantaged from poor neighborhoods need nothing other than a life rope thrown to them to take them out of their poverty.

Why the song and dance when the answer is simple?

Poverty is created by the profiteering of a few,
and we can totally do without them.

We do all the work, all the organizing, all the thinking, and all they do is lay claim to property of means of production and natural resources.
All excess produced goes straight into their fat wallets while disadvantaged kids flip burgers for 5 bucks an hour.

Disadvantaged kids need to get out of poverty, not do even more unpaid labor for the fat of the land.


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 05:05 PM by Totakeke
reply to post by Aggie Man



I recommend skimming over H.R. 1388. It's all in there.

[edit on 26-6-2009 by Totakeke]
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 2 days ago with 74 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 14 days ago with 37 member flags