"Hitler's Stealth Fighter" Reborn - The Horten 2-29, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 45 times


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 02:17 PM by Solomons
reply to post by ZeroKnowledge



London and Wallstreet bankers were funding Hitler so he kinda did have the west's economic might,or atleast their money..although trying to invade Russia was just a big mistake.I heard he was in the early stages of alzheimers so started making bad decisions to put it lightly.Anyway i would love to see an operational one aswell,it looks like it could have been drawn yesterday nevermind over 60 years ago.WW2 really was the kick up the bum engineering and technology needed and the germans were at the forefront,still are in many regards.


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 03:11 PM by Phage
The Horten brothers began working on the flying wing concept in the early 1930's. Their main reason for creating a flying wing had nothing to do with stealth. With no fuselage or empennage there is a lot less parasitic drag, making the design far more efficient than conventional designs. Like the Wright brothers, they started out with glider designs to try to figure out how to control the things.


The Horten's research was cut short by the onset of the war but in 1941 Walter convinced the Nazi's that it could be turned in to a useful warplane. As has been pointed out, flying wings can have inherent stability problems. Without advanced control systems they can be very difficult to keep in the air, particularly when performing the extreme maneuvers required by air combat.

www.flug-revue.rotor.com...

[edit on 6/26/2009 by Phage]


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 03:26 PM by Fang
Originally posted by Solomons
reply to
post by ZeroKnowledge



London and Wallstreet bankers were funding Hitler so he kinda did have the west's economic might,or atleast their money.


Oh really? I'd love to hear how and why they did that, particularly when the City of London was being bombed to smithereens.


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 03:30 PM by SpartanKingLeonidas
reply to post by warrenb



While I cannot agree with Adolph Hitler's views nor the Nazi's in any way whatsoever, the Horten "Flying-Wing" as it was known was a rather fascinating airplane.

Anyone who has ever followed the stealth bomber projects, like I have, knows the origins of them, stolen technology, or war plunder, through winning WWII.

Good post.

I am against Nazism and Fascism, in all ways, but history itself, is interesting and fascinates me.

[edit on 26-6-2009 by SpartanKingLeonidas]



reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 03:59 PM by Haunebu
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
reply to
post by warrenb



While I cannot agree with Adolph Hitler's views nor the Nazi's in any way whatsoever, the Horten "Flying-Wing" as it was known was a rather fascinating airplane.

Anyone who has ever followed the stealth bomber projects, like I have, knows the origins of them, stolen technology, or war plunder, through winning WWII.

Good post.

I am against Nazism and Fascism, in all ways, but history itself, is interesting and fascinates me.

[edit on 26-6-2009 by SpartanKingLeonidas]


That's because of 99% of all ATSers see the NATIONAL SOCIALISM era as the roots of all evil.

I'm still amazed that even here most of the members that question everything else don't question the history books when it concerns World War 2.

The more the NWO's power grows, the more I wish Germany had won.
I laugh very loud at Alex Jones and other misled morons that believe the Nazi's took over the White House well "they" did, but not the Naso's, it were/are the National Zionists!!!
The Third Reich can not be compared with today's NWO.
If Germany would have won we all would be living a decent and healthy life and "free energy" would be common.
Yes Germany had tough rules, but people are like kids, you got to raise them well and you only establish that by learning them to obey the rules and not by giving in.

Just keep believing in the Holohoax ( www.abovetopsecret.com... ) and never ever consider that Hitler might have been a liberator that has been framed by what others believe was the free world but in fact was no one else as the
NWO ----> Zionists.


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 04:19 PM by Solomons
reply to post by Fang



You should read Trading With the Enemy: An Expose of the Nazi-American Money Plot you can get it on amazon and it has alot of information,its not only about America like the title would make you believe.Also here is an article from the independent about secret documents from switzerland www.independent.co.uk...



[edit on 26-6-2009 by Solomons]


reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 05:35 PM by waynos
I don't know why most are wetting themselves over this. It is NOT a stealth fighter. As a few have already pointed out, but nobody seems to want to listen, the Flying wing has ALWAYS been a fascination with aircraft designers, some of the earliest practical designs dating from the 1880's but the lack of a petrol engine meant their far sighted designers were thwarted. The Hortens had been buiolding gliders on this model for several years. Nor was the design even a shock to the allies at the end of the war. Want proof? go to flightglobal.com and click 'archive' and search for 'flying wing'. There you will read a full page illustrated report on Hortens flying wings from 1943!

The guy who can't imagine why the structure is layered with a composite like material' isn't doing his reputation any favours. It was the plywood skinning that made it radar absorbant, completely by accident and of no benefit if it was coming towards you thanks to those huge round intakes. The layering was for strength and it was plastic to prevent the inner skin decaying if the outer was penetrated by moisture which could cause the glues to come unstuck. It was skinned with wood to save on using aluminium sheet. All ofthis paragraph by the way also applies to the DH Mosquito. Are we calling that a stealth bomber? No, because it looks normal and here we all seem to be mesmerised by the shape, which is beautiful, elegant and aerodynamic. But not sci fi.

An interesting comment earlier on is that it would have done a lot of Damage to Britain. How exactly would a defensive fighter have managed that? Far more at risk would have been the USAAF day bombing campaign.

Also, I am given to understand that it was actually a stable design. An RAE report on it from 1945 states how the aircraft could be held steady for shooting (at a target) by the application of both tip brakes simultaneously and something called 'bell shaped spanwise lift distribution' which was developed by the Hortens, ignored by everyone else for 40 years and which I don't understand.

However it was far too radical a design, as was the Ta 183 with its ridiculously inappropriate tail design and several other designs. The effort that went into which diverted resources away from building more Me 109's and Fw 190's which the Luftweaffe could have really done with, but not Me 262's for, as excellenty as that design was, the materials for the engines wasn't available and whats the point of building hundreds of a plane without engines? Oh thats right, those 'brilliant' Germans never figured that one out!




reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 06:05 PM by waynos
reply to post by Melyanna Tengwesta



What, so the Germans invaded Poland in order that we could take their technology? Oh sure

"can you stop talking about the War!
You started it!
We did not start it

Yes you did, you invaded Poland!"

Still makes me laugh after 30 years
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



In Case Of Videos Of Flying People
  Posted 9 days ago with 9 member flags
First flight for \'flapless\' plane - the Evolution of Aviation
  Posted 12 days ago with 4 member flags
Boeing X-37 and X-40 - the ultimate history
  Posted 5 days ago with 3 member flags
F22 mishap or more that meeets the eye?
  Posted 1 days ago with 3 member flags
Its a bird, its a plane, no its a ....
  Posted 14 days ago with 0 member flags