Civility, decorum, and on topic discussion...
Sans personal attacks will be the order of the day.
Mod Note: 9/11 Forum Is Now Under Close Staff Scrutiny– Please Review This Link.
Thank you.
[edit on 1/7/2009 by Mirthful Me]
New Pentagon Video Detailing Actual Flight Path Over Naval Annex, page 19
privacy
reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 03:56 PM by CameronFox
reply to post by Ligon
Yeah, they say it was becasue of the generator fire.
I find it interesting that months later, the smell of jet fuel was still prevalent in the HCAV ducts.
Yeah, they say it was becasue of the generator fire.
I find it interesting that months later, the smell of jet fuel was still prevalent in the HCAV ducts.
reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 04:13 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by CameronFox
Really? If you mean from burning diesel fuel...whilst JET-A and diesel are similar, to my nose they smell quite different when combusted.
On the ramp, I could walk by a GPU, or the fuel truck (both diesel engines) and the exhaust smelled quite different than jet exhaust...or the odor of fuel from an engine during the walkaround, when the airplane had just parked at the gate.....
Yeah, they say it was becasue of the generator fire.
Really? If you mean from burning diesel fuel...whilst JET-A and diesel are similar, to my nose they smell quite different when combusted.
On the ramp, I could walk by a GPU, or the fuel truck (both diesel engines) and the exhaust smelled quite different than jet exhaust...or the odor of fuel from an engine during the walkaround, when the airplane had just parked at the gate.....
reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 04:28 PM by Ligon
The big question here is whether or not BigSarge will allow a very small group of internet posters who do not want the details of his story made
public to successfully manipulate him with lies, strawmen, childish ridicule, and ad hominems on one hand and brown-nosing on the other.
They know you have a strong personal, emotional connection to the "official story" of the plane you saw having crashed into the building, BigSarge. They are trying to capitalize on your cognitive dissonance over the implications of where you and all of the witnesses with excellent vantage points in National Security Alert saw the plane.
Virtually ALL of us (myself included and no doubt CIT as well) had a substantial degree of emotional attachment to the official story and had to go through a very painful "rude awakening" when confronted with the undeniable evidence to the contrary. This is not information that any of us were happy to learn because of the horrifying implications.
Bottom line: Who here is asking you to meet him at Arlington Cemetary man to man and tell your story honestly for the camera in your own words?
The fact is that what you and all of the aforementioned witnesses saw prior to the explosion proves that the plane did not hit the building, regardless of how well deceieved you were by what you saw after the explosion.
It is not possible for all of the witnesses in National Security Alert to be simltaneously wrong in the exact same way, hallucinating the same north side flight path and hallucinating a bank. And by your own admission it likely would not have been possible for you to see the plane at all if it were on the official flight path (that is to say the very specific flight path on which it must have been to have hit the light poles and caused the observed directional damage to the building outlined in the ASCE Pentagon Building Performance Report.)
"Could the parts of an entire airplane, tons of luggage, IDs, etc. been planted in the Pentagon before hand? I guess it is possible, but highly unlikely." -BigSarge
"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth." - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
[edit on 1-7-2009 by Ligon]
They know you have a strong personal, emotional connection to the "official story" of the plane you saw having crashed into the building, BigSarge. They are trying to capitalize on your cognitive dissonance over the implications of where you and all of the witnesses with excellent vantage points in National Security Alert saw the plane.
Virtually ALL of us (myself included and no doubt CIT as well) had a substantial degree of emotional attachment to the official story and had to go through a very painful "rude awakening" when confronted with the undeniable evidence to the contrary. This is not information that any of us were happy to learn because of the horrifying implications.
Bottom line: Who here is asking you to meet him at Arlington Cemetary man to man and tell your story honestly for the camera in your own words?
The fact is that what you and all of the aforementioned witnesses saw prior to the explosion proves that the plane did not hit the building, regardless of how well deceieved you were by what you saw after the explosion.
It is not possible for all of the witnesses in National Security Alert to be simltaneously wrong in the exact same way, hallucinating the same north side flight path and hallucinating a bank. And by your own admission it likely would not have been possible for you to see the plane at all if it were on the official flight path (that is to say the very specific flight path on which it must have been to have hit the light poles and caused the observed directional damage to the building outlined in the ASCE Pentagon Building Performance Report.)
"Could the parts of an entire airplane, tons of luggage, IDs, etc. been planted in the Pentagon before hand? I guess it is possible, but highly unlikely." -BigSarge
"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth." - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
[edit on 1-7-2009 by Ligon]
reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 04:32 PM by Ligon
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by CameronFox
If you mean from burning diesel fuel...whilst JET-A and diesel are similar, to my nose they smell quite different when combusted.
Okay, but was your nose at the Pentagon on 9/11 to confirm which it was?
I certainly wouldn't know the difference and I'm sure many others wouldn't either.
Even if your expert nose was on the scene, it would not trump thirteen eyewitnesses independently placing the plane on the north side from a variety of excellent vantage points.
You're also forgetting about the exploding tanks of "aviation fuel"
We ran to the end of our building, turned left and saw nothing but huge, billowing black smoke, and a brilliant, brilliant explosion of fire." (...) One of the Pentagon's two fire trucks was parked only 50 feet from the crash site, and it was "totally engulfed in flames," Anderson says. Nearby, tanks full of propane and aviation fuel had begun igniting, and they soon began exploding, one by one.
Source: www.newsweek.com...
[edit on 1-7-2009 by Ligon]
reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 07:32 PM by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
reply to post by weedwhacker
Just so you know, they do use jet fuel in diesel generators, specifically, JP-8. It's what we used in the army for generators, turbine and diesel alike.
I do not know what grade specifically commercial jetliners use. If it was a generator used by a civillian company, then perhaps they used regular diesel. It would be worth finding out.
But yeah, diesel and jet fuel have totally different smells. Straight diesel gives me a good headache and makes me a little nauseated. Jet fuel doesn't.
Just so you know, they do use jet fuel in diesel generators, specifically, JP-8. It's what we used in the army for generators, turbine and diesel alike.
I do not know what grade specifically commercial jetliners use. If it was a generator used by a civillian company, then perhaps they used regular diesel. It would be worth finding out.
But yeah, diesel and jet fuel have totally different smells. Straight diesel gives me a good headache and makes me a little nauseated. Jet fuel doesn't.
That's because your lies will be exposed, when it
comes right down to it. You bit off way more than you can chew trying to go up against someone armed with the real truth. 
Bah. 
I know it will be a great presentation. As you
know, there is no one who can prove you are doing anything but disseminating real truth, as long as you keep collecting real truth- at your own
expense no less. Be empowered by those of us who will continue to stick by you no matter what.reply posted on 1-7-2009 @ 10:02 PM by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by TrueAmerican
Thanks T.A. but I wouldn't write off ole BigSarge just yet.
As I demonstrated in my response to him in this post, his initial statements before he claimed he watched the video or understood any of this evidence supported a north side approach.
Put yourself in his shoes.
Imagine you were so close to the event and actually saw the big plane and explosion while fully believing it hit. He admitted that he did not see it hit but deduced this so naturally he would believe it with all his heart.
And then imagine you toiled through all the destruction for days pulling out bodies of murdered innocents and you saw what you believed to be plane parts throughout the building.
Think of how all that would affect you and how you would feel.
Now imagine after all that you heard talk throughout the years of missiles and how that would make you feel!
In BigSarge's initial posts in this thread he actually assumed we were talking about missiles!
This is why I believed him when he said he hadn't watched the video when he confirmed his exact location at the cemetery to me.
Then imagine how you would feel after watching National Security Alert and there was nothing about missiles but all of these definitive honest witnesses, many of whom were only dozens of feet away from you and corroborate your account, yet all the information is laid out to you for the first time coherently explaining WHY this actually PROVES that what YOU witnessed proves a deception and how everything you believed with all your heart about that day is false.
I don't blame him one bit for reacting the way he has. It's perfectly understandable.
But I feel he has a good heart and is clearly an intelligent guy. I think he is already coming to terms with it and thinking about what he should do.
I think he'll do what's right.
[edit on 2-7-2009 by Craig Ranke CIT]
Thanks T.A. but I wouldn't write off ole BigSarge just yet.
As I demonstrated in my response to him in this post, his initial statements before he claimed he watched the video or understood any of this evidence supported a north side approach.
Put yourself in his shoes.
Imagine you were so close to the event and actually saw the big plane and explosion while fully believing it hit. He admitted that he did not see it hit but deduced this so naturally he would believe it with all his heart.
And then imagine you toiled through all the destruction for days pulling out bodies of murdered innocents and you saw what you believed to be plane parts throughout the building.
Think of how all that would affect you and how you would feel.
Now imagine after all that you heard talk throughout the years of missiles and how that would make you feel!
In BigSarge's initial posts in this thread he actually assumed we were talking about missiles!
This is why I believed him when he said he hadn't watched the video when he confirmed his exact location at the cemetery to me.
Then imagine how you would feel after watching National Security Alert and there was nothing about missiles but all of these definitive honest witnesses, many of whom were only dozens of feet away from you and corroborate your account, yet all the information is laid out to you for the first time coherently explaining WHY this actually PROVES that what YOU witnessed proves a deception and how everything you believed with all your heart about that day is false.
I don't blame him one bit for reacting the way he has. It's perfectly understandable.
But I feel he has a good heart and is clearly an intelligent guy. I think he is already coming to terms with it and thinking about what he should do.
I think he'll do what's right.
[edit on 2-7-2009 by Craig Ranke CIT]
reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 12:08 AM by Reheat
reply to post by TrueAmerican
You just reminded me of the "flyover witness" again.
Don't CIT supporters wonder why there is no animation demonstrating the "flyover witness" view?
Oh, there's a couple of graphics outlining Lane 1 of the South Parking Lot, but there is NO FLIGHT PATH or animation illustrating what Roosevelt Roberts said.
Really, you're so suspicious and critical of minor trivial details of the "Official Story" why aren't you curious or suspicious about this? It is a MAJOR omission and it has been stated that it is crucial to the entire theory. Without a flyover witness this entire charade falls flat on it's face. All that establishes these NOC or ONA flight path are witnesses and they all said the aircraft impacted and the physical evidence shows the aircraft impacted. Without a "flyover" witness there is nothing, nothing at all.
In fact, it would be helpful if someone knowledgeable of what Robert's said the aircraft did would just draw that flight path on a graphic and I'll do the calculations. It is so confusing I'm not sure that I understand what he said about where the aircraft flew. If it didn't hit the building it HAD to fly somewhere, unless you think it's still levitating to the west of the Pentagon.
CIT has been asked repeatedly to do this, yet they can't/won't. Don't you wonder why? Someone needs to help CIT put this together, so that others can be convinced of this earth shattering scientifically verified evidence that justifies a "National Security Alert".
This is a major omission from the video under discussion and I suspect those receiving the information from "Operations Accountability" are probably going to ask about this too.
Come on, surely someone understands what he said and can draw a simple graphic. I'll then do the calculations and they can be verified with anyone you choose and it will then be complete. Surely there is someone among all of these enthusiastic supporters who can help them out and avoid this gaping hole in the story....
You just reminded me of the "flyover witness" again.
Don't CIT supporters wonder why there is no animation demonstrating the "flyover witness" view?
Oh, there's a couple of graphics outlining Lane 1 of the South Parking Lot, but there is NO FLIGHT PATH or animation illustrating what Roosevelt Roberts said.
Really, you're so suspicious and critical of minor trivial details of the "Official Story" why aren't you curious or suspicious about this? It is a MAJOR omission and it has been stated that it is crucial to the entire theory. Without a flyover witness this entire charade falls flat on it's face. All that establishes these NOC or ONA flight path are witnesses and they all said the aircraft impacted and the physical evidence shows the aircraft impacted. Without a "flyover" witness there is nothing, nothing at all.
In fact, it would be helpful if someone knowledgeable of what Robert's said the aircraft did would just draw that flight path on a graphic and I'll do the calculations. It is so confusing I'm not sure that I understand what he said about where the aircraft flew. If it didn't hit the building it HAD to fly somewhere, unless you think it's still levitating to the west of the Pentagon.
CIT has been asked repeatedly to do this, yet they can't/won't. Don't you wonder why? Someone needs to help CIT put this together, so that others can be convinced of this earth shattering scientifically verified evidence that justifies a "National Security Alert".
This is a major omission from the video under discussion and I suspect those receiving the information from "Operations Accountability" are probably going to ask about this too.
Come on, surely someone understands what he said and can draw a simple graphic. I'll then do the calculations and they can be verified with anyone you choose and it will then be complete. Surely there is someone among all of these enthusiastic supporters who can help them out and avoid this gaping hole in the story....
reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 12:22 AM by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by Reheat
We don't draw or create flight paths because we did not see the plane.
Roosevelt only told the Library of Congress and us what he saw because he did not understand the implications.
Hopefully BigSarge has more courage.
After Roosevelt realized the implications he became too afraid to talk and backed out of doing an on camera interview when we would have had him illustrate the path.
Luckily he already told the Library of Congress about this plane in 2001 and we were able to record independent confirmation of this in 2008 before he got too scared to keep talking.
So you are forced to accuse him of hallucinating this plane or lying to the officials and us but we sure as heck aren't going to illustrate or animate a flight path for him simply because you or anyone demands it. Go ahead and put "scare quotes" around him without referencing his name all you want but he is a real person and a real witness whose personal credibility you are forced to attack in order to defend mass murder.
The fact that he saw the plane AT ALL is enough and the witnesses that Erik Dihle mentioned are even MORE confirmation of what all the north side witnesses already proved beyond a reasonable doubt without ANY flyover witnesses.
You just keep moving the goal posts because you will never believe it no matter how much evidence gets uncovered.
[edit on 2-7-2009 by Craig Ranke CIT]
We don't draw or create flight paths because we did not see the plane.
Roosevelt only told the Library of Congress and us what he saw because he did not understand the implications.
Hopefully BigSarge has more courage.
After Roosevelt realized the implications he became too afraid to talk and backed out of doing an on camera interview when we would have had him illustrate the path.
Luckily he already told the Library of Congress about this plane in 2001 and we were able to record independent confirmation of this in 2008 before he got too scared to keep talking.
So you are forced to accuse him of hallucinating this plane or lying to the officials and us but we sure as heck aren't going to illustrate or animate a flight path for him simply because you or anyone demands it. Go ahead and put "scare quotes" around him without referencing his name all you want but he is a real person and a real witness whose personal credibility you are forced to attack in order to defend mass murder.
The fact that he saw the plane AT ALL is enough and the witnesses that Erik Dihle mentioned are even MORE confirmation of what all the north side witnesses already proved beyond a reasonable doubt without ANY flyover witnesses.
You just keep moving the goal posts because you will never believe it no matter how much evidence gets uncovered.
[edit on 2-7-2009 by Craig Ranke CIT]
reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 03:43 AM by SPreston
posted by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by TrueAmerican
Thanks T.A. but I wouldn't write off ole BigSarge just yet.
As I demonstrated in my response to him in this post, his initial statements before he claimed he watched the video or understood any of this evidence supported a north side approach.
Put yourself in his shoes.
I think he'll do what's right.
And don't overlook that BigSarge realizes that there is a real potential danger to coming out of an anonymous identity and showing his real name and real face publicly. BigSarge was in the military and he knows what happened to Pat Tillman and others who became a problem to the Military Industrial Complex. The US Military and the US Government do not hesitate to remove problems, and the abandoned POWs and MIAs of the NamWar stand as proof of exactly what our Government and Military are capable of.
BigSarge knows that the Military and the Government and the CIA and other intelligence agencies remove people when they become a problem to the Corporate profits for the Military Industrial Complex (aka New World Order Elitists) if the risk is not too great. Actually the greater the publicity; the greater the safety. If they figure out who the anonymous person is; well - nobody will miss an anonymous person will they?
Sometimes fear for ones own safety is the deciding factor in patriotic and moral decisions. Some of us will do what is right irregardless and many will not. It is obvious that many Pentagon 9-11 eyewitness are frightened to come forward. Most definitely the alleged official south Flight 77 flight path witnesses are frightened to come forward because the JREF braggerts were unable to find even one.
Whether they are frightened of the Government or the publicity for some reason, or afraid to put their names and faces to a lie publicly, or are in fact just fictional characters invented by a disloyal Mainstream News Media is up for debate. Surely many of them know of the tens of thousands of 9-11 internet websites investigating 9-11. Where is their patriotism if they are truly eyewitnesses? Why haven't they come forward publicly in the past several years?
It would be great if BigSarge and many others could overcome their fears and come forward in order to seek justice for the victims of 9-11. It would be the right thing to do. Even if you are committed witnesses to the official south flight path; come forward and show your faces and give your names and testimony like the brave eyewitnesses to the Over the Naval Annex and North of Citgo north flight path eyewitnesses. They were not afraid to be questioned and publicly identified. They did not attempt to hide their faces from the public.
[edit on 7/2/09 by SPreston]
reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 08:33 AM by Reheat
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
reply to post by Reheat
We don't draw or create flight paths because we did not see the plane.
What is this?
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Roosevelt only told the Library of Congress and us what he saw because he did not understand the implications.
I thought you didn't speculate? Could it be that he's talked to LaGasse and finds your methods repulsive? No, you're clairvoyant and know what people think, so you can explain it to your minions, I'm sure.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Hopefully BigSarge has more courage.
So, Roberts' is a coward?
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
After Roosevelt realized the implications he became too afraid to talk and backed out of doing an on camera interview when we would have had him illustrate the path.
Here you go speculating again when you recently said you only deal in facts. In essence you really don't know if he is a valid "flyover witness" or not, it's just speculation.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Luckily he already told the Library of Congress about this plane in 2001 and we were able to record independent confirmation of this in 2008 before he got too scared to keep talking.
Here you go speculating again. One would think that by now your minions would realize that you lie with impunity about not speculating when it's convenient. You've rejected people before because they didn't meet your standard of reliability, so how can you say his statements would not be rejected for the same reason?
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
So you are forced to accuse him of hallucinating this plane or lying to the officials and us but we sure as heck aren't going to illustrate or animate a flight path for him simply because you or anyone demands it. Go ahead and put "scare quotes" around him without referencing his name all you want but he is a real person and a real witness whose personal credibility you are forced to attack in order to defend mass murder.
How do you know what I think? His statements are very confusing and I'm asking for clarification. After all you're touting him as a "flyover witness". You're going off the deep end simply because I asked for a illustration of what he said. I'm defending mass murder simply because I ask for clarification of what your witness said? I'm simply asking for the same standard of verification that you've demanded of witnesses in the past. You can do it, but I can't?
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
The fact that he saw the plane AT ALL is enough and the witnesses that Erik Dihle mentioned are even MORE confirmation of what all the north side witnesses already proved beyond a reasonable doubt without ANY flyover witnesses.
So, you really don't demand independent confirmation to draw a conclusion. You're just willing to speculate if it's needed to make your conclusions appear to be true. Roberts statements are AT BEST confusing and Dihle can't even remember saying what the CMH indicates he said or meant by his statements, yet you are willing to tout them as "flyover witnesses" anyway.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
You just keep moving the goal posts because you will never believe it no matter how much evidence gets uncovered.
I don't think you understand what "moving the goalposts" means. You've introduced new information and I'm asking for clarification of what was said and an illustration of the flight path. You have no standards for evidence? You repeatedly tout your evidence as "scientific" yet you can't even explain what these two witnesses meant by their statements.
You've rejected witness statements in the past for lesser reasons, yet you tout these two as your crucial "flyover witnesses" with no real clue about what they said or meant by their statements or if what they said was even possible. Some investigator you are!
[edit on 2-7-2009 by Reheat]
[edit on 2-7-2009 by Reheat]
WTC7, the smoking gun that just will not go away until the traitors are rounded up
Posted 4 days ago with 36 member flags
Posted 4 days ago with 36 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Occupy or Inhabit? Changing the Way We Build Communities
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 2 minutes ago
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 2 minutes ago
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
Naked Man Eating Victim's Face Shot And Killed By Miami Police: Report
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 17 hours ago, 39 flags
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 17 hours ago, 39 flags
Picture Shows How All Humans On Earth Would Fit Into One 900 Meter-Wide Ball
Fragile Earth: 8 hours ago, 36 flags
Fragile Earth: 8 hours ago, 36 flags
Pole Shift Survival MotherLoad (14GB) of SURVIVAL information (PDFs)
Survival: 11 hours ago, 16 flags
Survival: 11 hours ago, 16 flags
Toxic legacy of US assault on Fallujah 'worse than Hiroshima'
Breaking Alternative News: 7 hours ago, 15 flags
Breaking Alternative News: 7 hours ago, 15 flags
Naked man killed by Police near MacArthur Causeway was 'eating' face off victim
Breaking Alternative News: 13 hours ago, 14 flags
Breaking Alternative News: 13 hours ago, 14 flags
Fart joke leads to college student being arrested and charged
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 6 hours ago, 13 flags
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 6 hours ago, 13 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
Naked Man Eating Victim's Face Shot And Killed By Miami Police: Report
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 17 hours ago, 147 replies
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 17 hours ago, 147 replies
Picture Shows How All Humans On Earth Would Fit Into One 900 Meter-Wide Ball
Fragile Earth: 8 hours ago, 46 replies
Fragile Earth: 8 hours ago, 46 replies
Syria massacre in Houla condemned as outrage grows
Breaking Alternative News: 14 hours ago, 45 replies
Breaking Alternative News: 14 hours ago, 45 replies
Neil Armstrong, Talk About Transparent, PooPoos Apollo Fraud , Then Proceeds to Go All Ballistic
ATS Skunk Works: 13 hours ago, 43 replies
ATS Skunk Works: 13 hours ago, 43 replies
Naked man killed by Police near MacArthur Causeway was 'eating' face off victim
Breaking Alternative News: 13 hours ago, 35 replies
Breaking Alternative News: 13 hours ago, 35 replies
Toxic legacy of US assault on Fallujah 'worse than Hiroshima'
Breaking Alternative News: 7 hours ago, 33 replies
Breaking Alternative News: 7 hours ago, 33 replies
Naked Man Eating Victim's Face Shot And Killed By Miami Police: Report
Breaking General News: 16 hours ago, 30 replies
Breaking General News: 16 hours ago, 30 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.882 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.882 seconds
