NKorea vows nuke attack if provoked by US, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 25-6-2009 @ 02:16 PM by Leo Strauss
I know it's North Korea...but 100,000 protesters. A direct threat of a nuclear attack. They keep amping it up...I am starting to wonder

Link

SEOUL, South Korea — Punching their fists into the air and shouting "Let's crush them!" some 100,000 North Koreans packed Pyongyang's main square Thursday for an anti-U.S. rally as the communist regime promised a "fire shower of nuclear retaliation" for any American-led attack.


North Korean troops will respond to any sanctions or U.S. provocations with "an annihilating blow," one senior official vowed — a pointed threat as an American destroyer shadowed a North Korean freighter sailing off China's coast, possibly with banned goods on board.



reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 02:45 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by Leo Strauss



Call their bluff. Only the weak show such aggression to the rest of the world. The strong reserve their power, knowing they will survive.

Russia just claims it feels it;s being aggravated against when the US was planning to put up its missile shield in Europe. They know that they are strong enough to resist such efforts. North Korea flat out threatens nuclear war when a single ship moves in.

The simple fact is that an old man is dieing and the politburo is desperate to look strong. They are not. They are week. 100,000 is not a lot, and how can you trust a militant government's information of its own people?

They will try, and fail. We need to call their bluff and we need to do it now. Quickly before they can actually have time to seriously do anything.



reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 02:51 PM by Digital_Reality
N. Korea vows a 'fire shower of nuclear retaliation' if attacked

Link

Yeah I saw this earlier. It does not look good. I don't think we will all just make up and be friends again. I believe they will keep testing us until they actually do what they are threating. It sucks because I would like to live the rest of my days on this earth peacefully.


reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 03:26 PM by ctjctjctj
reply to post by Leo Strauss



RULE #1 - Never underestimate your enemy.

RULE #2 - See RULE #1.


reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 03:27 PM by jd140
reply to post by exile1981



A big statement on how stupid they are.

The US doesn't have a no use policy when it comes to nuclear weapons. We have a NO FIRST USE policy. They open that door and NK will become the worlds biggest parking lot.

They can fire as many as they want at us. We have a pretty good defense for that. How good do they think their umbrella is?

I guess the question they should ask themselves is, do you feel lucky punk, well do ya?


reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 04:27 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by Danna



Correct.

There is an unwritten rule for nations with nukes. It goes like this:

Nukes shall only be used for

A.) Destroying something that will hit the Earth
B.) Annihilation an alien invader
C.) Destroying the first city to be infected by zombies
D.) Destroying anything that risks the human population.
E.) Shooting at a nation that uses nukes in a way not described above.


This unwritten rule is simply understood. To break it is to wish death. In all honesty I think it is the politburo's want to look like a victim. Boo hoo, I'm the last powerful communist nation left. I have to go out with a bang looking like the victorious loser who defended till the end.

To hell with that.


reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 04:59 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by Zosynspiracy



You do realize that modern nuclear weapons do not produce fallout? Not all things nuclear create waste and fallout. helium, for instance, has 0 wastes.

Believe it or not but the nukes of the 50s are not the same as the nukes of today. Believe it or not, but today is different.

We do not nuke NK because we don't want deaths in such numbers on our hands. We want peace. All this talk of war hungry people is only for small wars. Nuclear war is for extremes.

Oh yea, and China and Russia probably wouldn't do anything. China would probably just see it as more land to absorb.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^