posted on Jun, 26 2009 @ 02:48 AM
As the article tells that many copies were made for security.
It will have to be analised and bring contriversy for years just as the Shroud of Turin.
When the scientists were allowed time to study the shroud and remove a small sample, the carbon dating "proved" it was made in later century.
Then, on review and painstaking research, it was discovered that the section that was decided and allowed to be removed as a sample was cut from a
repair made later in the shrouds existance as known with the image impression.
This was proven by finding unidentical thread, the later used in repair, caused the carbon dating error and the repair was of such quality and
workmanship, it remained undiscovered until recently, and it was fortunate someone analysed the procedures, samples, and data, proving the confident
scientists wrong.
Needless to say, there doesn't seem to be much chance of obtaining a new sample ever again, as many were opposed to the first issuance.
With the bungling of these acredited, renown scientific frontiersmen of these tests and processes, masters in their fields, one and all,
Can you blame them for not wanting to subject these artifacts to incompetent professors?
First time out after years of negotiating, and they blow it big time.
Thanks guys, for ruining the opertunity of generations to come,
You can high five and back pat amoungst yourselves at your "good ol' boy" gatherings and wonder how you could blow the tests, but how the results
were somewhat accurate under the circumstances.
I guess it will remain an unproven mystery, no one knowing for sure the legitimacy of the Shroud, and precise a dating to when it was made.
I wouldn't doubt this goes on with the "Ark" as well.
If history repeats itself, they both will remain a mystery, and even atempting to lobby for permission to test the artifact, or "Ark", as well as
citing arguments as to the value, import and obligation, (both spiritually and worldly), consenting to analysis and allowing a sample to conclude
with out doubt, or, both items shall remain an enigma.
[edit on 26-6-2009 by imd12c4funn]
[edit on 26-6-2009 by imd12c4funn]