It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Since 1945, the USA has been responsible either directly or indirectly of helping remove dozens of governments, many democratically elected, around the world. Sometimes the events are kept secret for years and only slowly come out. Other times, the events are the cause of demonstrations, anger and resentment at the time they occur.
Whenever, an event like this occurs there are two reasons to be considered.
- Reason 1: The reason given by the USA, its media and its friends around the world. Reasons like Communism, Terrorism, Human Rights, Freedom, Liberation, Weapons of Mass Destruction, etc.
- Reason 2: The actual reason. This is usually hidden from the general public and has to be looked for in quotes by under-reported officials or subsequent events on the ground. Often, the victims of the change of government know the real reasons better than the populations of the Western countries. Real reasons are many but usually include Business Interests, Access to Resources, Markets, Military Bases, Strategic Value, or Political Support.
In the list below only successful changes of government are listed. Many attempts have failed. Cuba is the best example of this.
- Year :-: Country :-: Reason Given :-: Actual Reason
- 1949 :-: Syria :-: Communism :-: Elected government against USA political interests and pro-Palestinian.
- 1949 :-: Greece :-: Communism :-: Elected government against USA political and economic interests.
- 1952 :-: Cuba :-: None :-: Elected government against USA business interests.
- 1953 :-: Iran :-: None :-: Elected government against USA oil interests.
- 1953 :-: British Guyana :-: None :-: Access to sugar and bauxite.
- 1954 :-: Guatemala :-: Communism :-: Elected government against USA business interests.
- 1955 :-: South Vietnam :-: Communism :-: French backed leader replaced by USA backed leader.
- 1957 :-: Haiti :-: Haiti is near the USA :-: Previous government against USA business interests.
- 1958 :-: Laos :-: None :-: Pro-USA government wanted.
- 1959 :-: Laos :-: None :-: Pro-USA government wanted.
- 1960 :-: South Korea :-: Communism :-: Previous leader not strong enough for USA.
- 1960 :-: Laos :-: None :-: Pro-USA government wanted.
- 1960 :-: Ecuador :-: Communism :-: Previous government too independent in foreign policy.
- 1963 :-: Dominican Republic :-: Business Interests :-: Elected government against USA business interests.
- 1963 :-: South Vietnam :-: None :-: Previous leader's policies led to televised suicides.
- 1963 :-: Honduras :-: Communism :-: Pro-USA government and access to resources.
- 1963 :-: Guatemala :-: Communism :-: Military government was about to allow elections.
- 1963 :-: Ecuador :-: None :-: Elected government too independent.
- 1964 :-: Brazil :-: Communism :-: Access to resources and cheap labour.
- 1964 :-: Bolivia :-: Communism :-: Previous government too independent in foreign policy.
- 1965 :-: Zaire :-: None :-: Access to cobalt, copper and diamonds.
- 1966 :-: Ghana :-: None :-: Previous government too independent in foreign policy.
- 1967 :-: Greece :-: None :-: Military bases.
- 1970 :-: Cambodia :-: None :-: Previous king against USA political interests.
- 1970 :-: Bolivia :-: None :-: Country took ownership of its oil and tin.
- 1972 :-: El Salvador :-: Communism :-: Elected leader against USA business interests.
- 1973 :-: Chile :-: Communism :-: Elected government against USA business interests.
- 1975 :-: Australia :-: None :-: Elected government had unsuitable foreign policy.
- 1979 :-: South Korea :-: None :-: Pro-USA government wanted.
- 1980 :-: Liberia :-: Democracy :-: Pro-USA government wanted.
- 1982 :-: Chad :-: None :-: Pro-USA government wanted.
- 1983 :-: Grenada :-: Democracy :-: Pro-USA government wanted.
- 1987 :-: Fiji :-: Democracy :-: Previous elected government supported nuclear-free Pacific.
2002 :-: Venezuela :-: None :-: Disagreed with foreign policy of elected government.
2004 :-: Haiti :-: Fraudulent elections :-: Disagreed with economic policy of elected government.
CIA operations follow the same recurring script. First, American business interests abroad are threatened by a popular or democratically elected leader. The people support their leader because he intends to conduct land reform, strengthen unions, redistribute wealth, nationalize foreign-owned industry, and regulate business to protect workers, consumers and the environment. So, on behalf of American business, and often with their help, the CIA mobilizes the opposition. First it identifies right-wing groups within the country (usually the military), and offers them a deal: “We’ll put you in power if you maintain a favorable business climate for us.” The Agency then hires, trains and works with them to overthrow the existing government (usually a democracy). It uses every trick in the book: propaganda, stuffed ballot boxes, purchased elections, extortion, blackmail, sexual intrigue, false stories about opponents in the local media, infiltration and disruption of opposing political parties, kidnapping, beating, torture, intimidation, economic sabotage, death squads and even assassination. These efforts culminate in a military coup, which installs a right-wing dictator. The CIA trains the dictator’s security apparatus to crack down on the traditional enemies of big business, using interrogation, torture and murder. The victims are said to be “communists,” but almost always they are just peasants, liberals, moderates, labor union leaders, political opponents and advocates of free speech and democracy. Widespread human rights abuses follow.
The CIA history of operation TPAJAX excerpted below was first disclosed by James Risen of The New York Times in its editions of April 16 and June 18, 2000, and posted in this form on its website at:
www.nytimes.com...
This extremely important document is one of the last major pieces of the puzzle explaining American and British roles in the August 1953 coup against Iranian Premier Mohammad Mossadeq. Written in March 1954 by Donald Wilber, one of the operation’s chief planners, the 200-page document is essentially an after-action report, apparently based in part on agency cable traffic and Wilber’s interviews with agents who had been on the ground in Iran as the operation lurched to its conclusion.
British and American agents are on the ground in Iraq fomenting revolt among opposition groups and potential traitors in Saddam Hussein's inner circle as part of a covert campaign to topple him, senior officials disclosed last night.
The admission, on the eve of a conference of Iraqi opposition figures in London, is powerful evidence of a renewed determination in Washington and London to overthrow the Iraqi dictator.
Although the officials conceded that the CIA and MI6 operations were unlikely to succeed without direct military action, a senior source in the Bush administration said that the world should not be misled by the lack of overt military activity.
"American personnel are supporting the Iraqi opposition and working with dissatisfied elements within Saddam's regime, even though he has killed quite a few of these people. Britain is involved too," the official told The Telegraph.
"We could wake up one morning and find regime change in Baghdad has happened completely unexpectedly. It would be hard to do but it's not impossible."
CBS News' Kimberly Dozier speaks with Robert Baer, who recounts his unique experiences as a CIA operative and discusses the future state of diplomacy between the U.S. and Iran.
Originally posted by Kombatt98
reply to post by warrenb
hell , i agree with you , that john124 seems to be a propaganda agent
Originally posted by john124
Originally posted by Kombatt98
reply to post by warrenb
hell , i agree with you , that john124 seems to be a propaganda agent
oh no you've caught me
My reptilian Israeli overlords will have me for breakfast!
Anyway a more light-hearted approach to ats is better.
Originally posted by Kombatt98
Originally posted by john124
Originally posted by Kombatt98
reply to post by warrenb
hell , i agree with you , that john124 seems to be a propaganda agent
oh no you've caught me
My reptilian Israeli overlords will have me for breakfast!
Anyway a more light-hearted approach to ats is better.
hey , twitter , still tweeting , huh .??
call me when you provide evidence for your lies . by the way use Al Jazeera or RT or the Hindu on this issue , not twitter BS or western corporate propaganda
like 'tanks rolling into tehran' BS . so where are your tanks rolling into tehran'
You speak like you wish tanks were in Tehran killing people.
Originally posted by WinoBot
Well can you show any proof that this is currently happening in Iran? I mean, at least John has evidence or somewhat evidence that can be considered plausible.
Originally posted by warrenb
Originally posted by WinoBot
Well can you show any proof that this is currently happening in Iran? I mean, at least John has evidence or somewhat evidence that can be considered plausible.
sure thing, here:
Protests in Iran - really? where?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by WinoBot
not really sure what this is proof of. This shows that america is causing a coup in Iran? I can take a picture of an empty street and China and say 'no chinese people live in China,' but that wouldn't be true.
Originally posted by WinoBot
I mean, at least John has evidence or somewhat evidence that can be considered plausible.
Originally posted by warrenb
Originally posted by WinoBot
not really sure what this is proof of. This shows that america is causing a coup in Iran? I can take a picture of an empty street and China and say 'no chinese people live in China,' but that wouldn't be true.
Well like you said
Originally posted by WinoBot
I mean, at least John has evidence or somewhat evidence that can be considered plausible.
Has evidence of or evidence that can be considered plausible.
just like this correct?