reply to post by Moodle
First of all many thanks for taking the time to read over my latest article and also for raising some interesting and intelligent questions. Very
much appreciated and I shall endeavour to do my best to reply.
SC: This circumference of 7,543 cubits might not, at first glance, appear to be a particularly meaningful value. However, that changes when we
then convert this value into INCHES of which there are 20.618 inches to 1 AE cubit. Thus we have:
Moodle: I don't get what inches has to do with this. did the AEs use inches?
SC: Okay – this does require some explanation. It is my contention that the linear measures of the inch and the cubit are directly and inextricably
related to time. I have written a detailed article about how these units of measure are related which you can read here:
The Gravity Cubit
I hope this helps you better understand the relationship between the cubit, the inch and Earth time.
Now, this is not to say that the AEs of the Dynastic Period actually used the inch themselves or were even aware of it but it does seem that the
of this blueprint or ‘codex’ understood the inch (and the cubit). The knowledge of the inch may have become lost or forgotten to
the later AE of the Dynastic Period although knowledge of the cubit survived (but not its true scientific origins).
Moodle: Also i'm not real clear about the relationship between the radius and the circumference and how both relate to time.
SC: The radius = 1200 cubits, the diameter 2400 cubits. We immediately recognise a half solar day (12 hours) and a full solar day (24 hours) i.e. we
recognise TIME. The circumference of 7,543 cubits (a linear measure derived from TIME) converted to inches (another unit of measure derived from
TIME) = 155520 inches (rounded). The value 155520 / 12 = 12,960 which again is related to precessional TIME (the value of 12,960 reminds us of the
duration of half of 1 Platonic Year). Everything here is intrinsically and specifically related to Earth time including the very units of measure
themselves i.e. the inch and the cubit.
Moodle: i'm not saying your estimations are wrong but you took 2 extra steps to confirm the radius/diameter is in fact related to the
circumference with time being the relating factor.
SC: I agree it’s a leap to connect 1200 radius & 2400 diameter with TIME but is it such a great leap when it can be shown how the units of measure
(i.e. the cubit & inch) can themselves be derived FROM Earth time?
Moodle: 7543 x 20.618 = 155521.574 / 12 = 12960.1311
now this does seem a little bit of a stretch. if you can show that the AE's used inches it would help
SC: AS I have said above – I doubt the AE of the Dynastic Period used the inch – there is little doubt they used the cubit. It seems, however,
that the Designers
of this Blueprint knew both measures.
Moodle: but not a lot. it's not like you're comparing days to weeks. you're comparing a 12/24 hour cycle with a 13/26 thousand year cycle.
this seems way off ratio when multiplying by 3.14. i'm not saying it's wrong, but it does seem a little much.
SC: This is not about ratios. What I am saying is that in presenting the values of 1200 and 2400 cubits we are being given a HINT; we are being told
to think in terms of TIME; that this great circle circumscribed around the three outer-most points of the Giza pyramid field is somehow connected with
TIME. The next value of 155520 (circumference in inches rounded) is perhaps HINTING at a particular aspect of TIME we are to consider i.e.
In short, these values may have been presented in order to ‘guide’ us into considering the structures in a particular mode of thought i.e. in
terms of TIME but more specifically, PRECESSION TIME.
Moodle: why have teh sphinx as a marker (with instructions) but yet there are no markers (monuments) to declare the dates that actually have
significance. why use the 6 queens pyramids to do this?
SC: This is an excellent question and it shows that you are really giving this precession clock some deep thought. Again - much appreciated. Okay
– let me try and explain.
Why do we use the term ‘afternoon’? Think about it. What does that actually mean in physical terms? What it means is that the sun in the
morning is climbing into the sky, reaches its highest point – noon - and then it begins to descend i.e. afternoon. High noon is the culmination
of the sun in its daily cycle across the sky. So, when we say twelve minutes after noon we are in fact saying that the sun has moved
(descended) twelve minutes across the sky from its high noon (culmination) position.
[edit on 26/6/2009 by Scott Creighton]