It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The CIA/MOSSAD, AMAN/DIA did 9/11! [BASED ON KNOWN HOAXES]

page: 18
107
<< 15  16  17    19 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 07:53 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitruvian
 

Wow! Just chanced upon this thread and I almost lost my eyeballs! So why was it shoved into the 'Hoax' forum? Because of just one 'hoax' or misrepresentation? Wow again!


Anyway, Mike probably was so pissed, he likely quit ATS for good. I hope he comes back. But why the heck was he messing around with Zionist conspiracies when he was a SME in the Aiens and UFO forum? The stuff he posted especially on the Moon and Mars threads was amazing, but he had no business in messing around with Zionist conspiracies.
He seemed to be out of his depth here because such topics are too hot to handle. Rubbing the PTBs the wrong way ain't a good idea!


[edit on 12-6-2010 by OrionHunterX]



posted on Jun, 12 2010 @ 08:01 AM
link   
reply to post by OrionHunterX
 


How is Mike anyway?

Would be nice to see him come back to ATS.



posted on Jun, 13 2010 @ 01:21 AM
link   
The Jewish Mafia the Mossad and the CIA are all the same thing. The CIA and the Mossad have been doing joint operations since the CIA was called the OSS.
If you take Dianne Feinstein for instance her Uncle was a Jewish mobster named "Morrie" who used to fix the San Francisco Seals baseball games back in the 1940s (She admits this in her own autobiography)
She was behind Jonestown which was a CIA operation in which the AIDS virus was first incubated there by DR Lawrence Layton a Virus specialist who was taken out of the Nazi germ warfare program. It was Feinstein that was behind taking a 100 year old ban off of the books in San Francisco that Gay men couldn't bathe together in Spas around SF so she could help spread the disease through the Gay community.
Today she is the richest woman in the United States from making billions from the war in Iraq and Afghanistan while her stance is that she is against the war.

[edit on 13-6-2010 by Mark Carter]



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 08:08 AM
link   
Oh no, say it isn't so ATS. You're bought off by the zionists too? A comprehensive list of "who's who" and you place it in the hoax forum? I am going to look over every comment and see exactly where the "known hoaxes" are, and if I can't find them I will try my best to expose placing his thread in the hoax file as a hoax itself.

I bet it feels powerful to label sensitive material a hoax, but as they say, power corrupts.



posted on Jun, 18 2010 @ 08:22 AM
link   
So basically the only hoax of this thread from what I've gathered is that it says only 1 Jew died in the attacks, and the OP even admits this is a hoax and he regrets this muddies the water, but that does not automatically discredit everything else he said.

So, yeah, way to prevent the truth movement from learning the truth. Now you know why people wonder why the truth movement ignores the Israeli connection.



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 09:55 AM
link   
iran brains worked i mean the persian brains and north korea both sat in the back ground like mafia dons and did it in cold blooded manner, the google has great information and 'c_i_a" is always part with google but what happened in the case of 9/11 that cia was sure of the attack, because the 9/11 was not planned just in usa but they was a rumour in the alien world that the attack was told to 'cia' via google also on the same day else where but for precaution the jews stayed away from the ones who worked in the twin towers, just for pre caution they stayed away not that 'cia; was involved, its a true hizbulla and hamas attack backed by iranian mafia, what 'cia' did not have till a year ago was translators, to translate the mass information, by godman enzo f60 the alien mafia don on this earth.


Mod Edit: All Caps – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 21/7/2010 by Mirthful Me]

[edit on 21-7-2010 by GODMAN ENZO F60]



posted on Nov, 6 2010 @ 10:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by Crakeur
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.

allow me to debunk the nonsense of the one dead jew theory
www.snopes.com...

It's total crap made up to perpetrate a nonsensical story.

Related to that steaming pile of nonsense is the Odigo story which, while still worth looking into, is nowhere near the "get out of the WTC" type story that you make it out to be.

www.911myths.com...

As to the rest, well, if these two aspects of your story are crap, is it worth looking into the rest? All of these things have been brought up and investigated and some of them have validity, others do not but your lumping them all together simply makes the important issues seem less important.

Of course, for those of us who lost friends and family on that day, for those of us who still look up with fear when we hear airplanes flying overhead, this isn't a hobby. For us, it's still a tragedy.

Can't ya'll take up stamp collecting and stop muddying the waters of this tragedy?

Can't the real investigation focus on how this happened, not focus on coming up with some of the most inane and ridiculous propaganda around?

Hell, you might as well claim there were holograms if you're going to claim that only 1 jew died that day.

This is NYC, Jesse Jackson called it Hymie Town for a reason. You'd be hard pressed to find a building in manhattan that has only one jew in it during office hours and, for the "jews control banking" folks, the WTC was at the heart of the Wall Street, where all the banks and trading and investing houses are. That's like hitting at the heart of Hymie Town if the rumors of jewish banking control are to be believed.

This whole concept is tired. More so when the op rehashes old stuff and doesn't even properly credit the original authors for this tripe.



As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.


First off, snopes is pro-Obama birth certificate, I'm not saying the B.C. issue is one way or another, but obviously we can see where snopes sides. Secondly, the snopes article on the 4000 Jews (www.snopes.com...) contains no external links proving any of their claims, the only links are to newspapers talking about the 4000 missing Jews and the ABC news story says


New details of missing foreigners have pushed the number of people believed missing or dead in the rubble of the World Trade Center to 6,333 today as President Bush (news - web sites) urged prayers of support for the victims of the terror attacks.


Everyone knows the official tally is 3000, not 6,333 so, using your own words


As to the rest, well, if these two aspects of your story are crap, is it worth looking into the rest?


I'm surprised an ATS moderator would call someone's theories crap, and then you start mentioning holograms, and say


Can't ya'll take up stamp collecting and stop muddying the waters of this tragedy?


Isn't this against the terms of service, being impolite to other posters, as a moderator shouldn't you know this?

I highly urge others to look into these claims.



posted on Nov, 6 2010 @ 02:21 PM
link   
I have little doubt, being a student of history, that the Zionists are more than capable of perpetrating such an attack as the ones witnessed on 9/11 to serve their own ends. I'm sure all you doubters out there are aware, that terrorism as we know it today, was not started by Muslims, but by Zionist terrorists who blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem in 1946. This terrorist organization was headed up by Manachem Begin, who later became the Prime Minister of Israel...no dirty deed goes unrewarded in Israel. I could go on and on, but that would deprive you of the sheer horror at discovering just how much Israel is not a "friend" of the American people, or of any other people...except for Jews of course.



posted on Nov, 6 2010 @ 03:02 PM
link   
The most interesting part is if these 'terrorists' were such 'masterminds' that they were capable to execute such a large scale attack than why haven't they attacked again with such furiousity?

Why has it come to failed underwear and printer cartridge bombs?



posted on Nov, 6 2010 @ 03:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Doujutsu
The most interesting part is if these 'terrorists' were such 'masterminds' that they were capable to execute such a large scale attack than why haven't they attacked again with such furiousity?

Why has it come to failed underwear and printer cartridge bombs?





The same could be said of al qaeda, if Bin Laden was so smart (assuming he's still alive) why is he now resorting to failed underwear attacks? Did the FBI suddenly become more intelligent or did the taliban suddenly become more stupid? I suppose people will just say the FBI is becoming more intelligent, but then why haven't they taken out Anwar Al Awlaki the CIA lackey? Probably because he is a lackey.



posted on Nov, 6 2010 @ 03:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lord Jules

Originally posted by Doujutsu
The most interesting part is if these 'terrorists' were such 'masterminds' that they were capable to execute such a large scale attack than why haven't they attacked again with such furiousity?

Why has it come to failed underwear and printer cartridge bombs?


The same could be said of al qaeda, if Bin Laden was so smart (assuming he's still alive) why is he now resorting to failed underwear attacks?Did the FBI suddenly become more intelligent or did the taliban suddenly become more stupid? I suppose people will just say the FBI is becoming more intelligent, but then why haven't they taken out Anwar Al Awlaki the CIA lackey? Probably because he is a lackey.


Are you trying to deflect or answer my questions?

If those 'masterminds' were capable of planning such an attack than surely they can sit around in a cave and plan a simillar attack? Or maybe carry out small scale attacks on weekly or montly basis which must be easier to plan?

I am talking about those particular 'masterminds'.



posted on Nov, 6 2010 @ 03:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck

Originally posted by ipsedixit
I agree with patent98310.

People really should park the word "jew" when it comes to 9/11. The words "Israeli", "Israel" and possibly "zionist" have a lot to do with 9/11 as the OP makes abundantly clear. The word "jew" has nothing to do with 9/11 and it is very unlikely that the word "muslim" has anything to do with 9/11.


And I agree with this commentary. There should be a very clear distinction drawn between Jews and the politics of Israel. Some will never understand that.

That being said, Mike, a disturbing report from you...and the subject has not yet been exhausted. Keep digging, keep reporting.

In the shadowy world of spooks, there is a threshold reached where you can't be sure if the people you are working for are actually the people you think you are working for.


Why should people distinguish between Jew and Israeli - when the Israeli government itself does not do that?
When people criticise Israel's actions, the Israeli President and the Prime Minister both respond with accusations of anti-semitism NOT anti-Israeli-ism.

They want it both ways - but I for one will no longer buy into their blatant hypocrisy.
edit on 6-11-2010 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by Doujutsu

Originally posted by Lord Jules

Originally posted by Doujutsu
The most interesting part is if these 'terrorists' were such 'masterminds' that they were capable to execute such a large scale attack than why haven't they attacked again with such furiousity?

Why has it come to failed underwear and printer cartridge bombs?


The same could be said of al qaeda, if Bin Laden was so smart (assuming he's still alive) why is he now resorting to failed underwear attacks?Did the FBI suddenly become more intelligent or did the taliban suddenly become more stupid? I suppose people will just say the FBI is becoming more intelligent, but then why haven't they taken out Anwar Al Awlaki the CIA lackey? Probably because he is a lackey.


Are you trying to deflect or answer my questions?

If those 'masterminds' were capable of planning such an attack than surely they can sit around in a cave and plan a simillar attack? Or maybe carry out small scale attacks on weekly or montly basis which must be easier to plan?

I am talking about those particular 'masterminds'.




They, whoever they are, are planning similar attacks: underwear bomber, fort hood, broadway bombing, yemen bombing, the only difference is these latest ones (with the exception of fort hood) are duds. So either way, the terrorists are becoming less effective.
edit on 10-11-2010 by Lord Jules because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 10:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by wcitizen

Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck

Originally posted by ipsedixit
I agree with patent98310.

People really should park the word "jew" when it comes to 9/11. The words "Israeli", "Israel" and possibly "zionist" have a lot to do with 9/11 as the OP makes abundantly clear. The word "jew" has nothing to do with 9/11 and it is very unlikely that the word "muslim" has anything to do with 9/11.


And I agree with this commentary. There should be a very clear distinction drawn between Jews and the politics of Israel. Some will never understand that.

That being said, Mike, a disturbing report from you...and the subject has not yet been exhausted. Keep digging, keep reporting.

In the shadowy world of spooks, there is a threshold reached where you can't be sure if the people you are working for are actually the people you think you are working for.


Why should people distinguish between Jew and Israeli - when the Israeli government itself does not do that?
When people criticise Israel's actions, the Israeli President and the Prime Minister both respond with accusations of anti-semitism NOT anti-Israeli-ism.

They want it both ways - but I for one will no longer buy into their blatant hypocrisy.
edit on 6-11-2010 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)


not all jews are pro-Israel, but unfortunately the number of activists are few and far between. The parasites claim to be speaking for the Jews, and so as a Jew I would think they would either be for or against this, many go along with it, but some oppose it.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Lord Jules

Originally posted by wcitizen

Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck

Originally posted by ipsedixit
I agree with patent98310.

People really should park the word "jew" when it comes to 9/11. The words "Israeli", "Israel" and possibly "zionist" have a lot to do with 9/11 as the OP makes abundantly clear. The word "jew" has nothing to do with 9/11 and it is very unlikely that the word "muslim" has anything to do with 9/11.


And I agree with this commentary. There should be a very clear distinction drawn between Jews and the politics of Israel. Some will never understand that.

That being said, Mike, a disturbing report from you...and the subject has not yet been exhausted. Keep digging, keep reporting.

In the shadowy world of spooks, there is a threshold reached where you can't be sure if the people you are working for are actually the people you think you are working for.


Why should people distinguish between Jew and Israeli - when the Israeli government itself does not do that?
When people criticise Israel's actions, the Israeli President and the Prime Minister both respond with accusations of anti-semitism NOT anti-Israeli-ism.

They want it both ways - but I for one will no longer buy into their blatant hypocrisy.
edit on 6-11-2010 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)


not all jews are pro-Israel, but unfortunately the number of activists are few and far between. The parasites claim to be speaking for the Jews, and so as a Jew I would think they would either be for or against this, many go along with it, but some oppose it.


Yes, there are some Jews who do speak out, and vocierously...but in a sense perhaps the Jewish people don't do themselves any favours - if more did speak out the distinction between the parasites and the ordinary Jewish people would become more obvious. The large majority of the ordinary people of the world, of whatever creed, colour or religion, despise what these parasites are doing.



posted on Dec, 7 2010 @ 07:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by filosophia
So basically the only hoax of this thread from what I've gathered is that it says only 1 Jew died in the attacks, and the OP even admits this is a hoax and he regrets this muddies the water, but that does not automatically discredit everything else he said.

So, yeah, way to prevent the truth movement from learning the truth. Now you know why people wonder why the truth movement ignores the Israeli connection.


I did some more research on the "no jews killed" aspect and found that it is referring to Israeli Jews, as opposed to American Jews. The claim states that only four Israeli Jews were killed, while possibly hundreds of American/European Jews were killed. I haven't yet to verify this claim, but I also have not been able to debunk it either. Regardless, it is upsetting that this thread would be placed in the hoax forum because one of its claims was misinterpreted. WAY TO SHOOT THE MESSENGER!

edit: also, some of the Israeli Jews that were supposedly killed were on the passenger planes, so if there were really no passenger planes, then the number is even smaller. Just another reason to reinvestigate the issue and not throw it in the hoax bin. What a disgrace.
edit on 7-12-2010 by filosophia because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 11 2011 @ 07:51 AM
link   
Did other high ranking members of a country come forward with similiar claims?



posted on Feb, 14 2011 @ 10:08 AM
link   
reply to post by Cassius666
 


ex-italian president says 9/11 was an inside job

www.davidduke.com...

and of course Ahmadenijad.

Also a Japanese member of parliament gave an analysis of why 9/11 was an inside job. He also asked the head of the parliament if Japan independently verified their Japanese citizens that were killed on 9/11, the head of the parliament responded that they assumed the US used DNA detection methods and so they trusted the US on that issue.
edit on 14-2-2011 by filosophia because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 16 2011 @ 06:48 PM
link   
Who thinks that this thread should be moved back into the open 9/11 forum? 9/11 is a controversial issue, the 9/11 no plane theory is not labeled a hoax, but this is? If you think this thread should be moved back to the original 9/11 forum, give this comment a star. Thank you.



posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 10:10 AM
link   
This is why I am against the hoax label on ATS. This should continue to be an active, "Hot" topic, but with the hoax label slapped on it the conversation is shooed the other way, like herding sheep into a pen, "don't go there, that's a hoax," I'm surprised someone didn't invoke the Sorcha Faal flag to further discredit this theory. But I can't totally blame ATS, it's up to you to be able to see through the barriers of truth, don't stop just because someone in a position of authority placed a hoax label on something.



new topics

top topics



 
107
<< 15  16  17    19 >>

log in

join