It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Finally ... a human designed ufo ! Come take a look for yourself.

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 25 2009 @ 01:43 AM
link   
I don't know about you lot but I'm tired of seeing/ hearing all these claims regarding ufo's (alien or man-made) and being offered very little by way of real, physical and concrete proof of their existance. Virtually all videos of supposed ufo's are little better than indistict fuzzy, blurry or tiny spots totally lacking in any clear detail and as for photographic images, if they're not blurred beyond recognition, then they're usually fake or doctored images.

Now, I can't comment regarding ufo's of alien origin (if they even exist) but I can certainly offer substantial proof that at least one of the many ufo's is to a high degree of probability completely man-made.

Below you'll find a series of images of a disk/saucer shaped device located on the ground within a heavily US military controlled area. For this reason and also because there appears to be active work in progress on the device, lends credence that this particular saucer/device is of human origin.

Now, I've studied these images for a number of months and the most likely explanation that I can come up with for it being on the ground at this location is as follows:

The device may have developed technical problems whilst in the air that resulted in it become un-airworthy and requiring it to make an emergency forced landing. It approached the ground at a very shallow angle and the leading edge of the disk impacted the ground. This resulted in the formation of a shallow, elongated crater as the craft slid along the ground before coming to a halt at the far end of the crater. A very significant amount of structural damage occured to the leading edge that had impacted the ground and rendering the craft unable to function. The craft remained in this position whilst repair work was initiated on the damaged leading edge.
 

An overhead view showing the rugged terrain and the devices location relative to it's surroundings.

 

A closer view - note the presence of what may be a vehicle (smaller circle)

 

An overhead view showing the massive amount of leading edge damage sustained during the forced landing.
The rear end of the crater is obscured by a dust cloud.

 

A closer view showing the extent of the structural damage

 

In the next 2 images it can be readily seen what looks like 3 towerlike structures which may be involved in repair work to the craft

 



 

The next 3 images show what seems to be some kind of dark/black device or superstructure mounted in the middle of the craft.

 



 

A good view of the leading edge structural damage

 



 

Indicating the approximate location of the dust obscurred end of the crater (point of impact)

 

Notice the significant thickness of the rear edge of the craft.
Also notice the indentation in the rear which appears to be of deliberate design.

 



 

Now this is incredibly interesting - there is an obvious hatch/entrance located at the rear of the craft and it is in the open position.
Also notice the churned up dirt pathway/trail leading directly away from the hatch - as if there's been a lot of activity to and from the hatchway.

 



 



 



 

Seems to be some kind of structures

 

The structures are a little bit more obvious in this image

 

Showing the approx location of a dirt track/trail that was destroyed when the crater formed.

 



 

Now I'm not sure if what I've indicated is real ... to me it looks like a point source with some kind of ray being projected from that point and widening until it touches the craft.

 

Showing 2 towerlike structures, the rear indentation, the hatch & dirt track and the "ray" effect.

 

This clearly shows the central dark structure, 2 towerlike structures and the "ray" effect.

 


Now I want you all to understand that as far as I'm concerned, what we have above is strong & significant evidence of a saucer/disk like device, apparently damaged and undergoing repairs on the spot. Don't ask me why it wasn't removed to a more secure location but I'm sure they had very good reasons for leaving it in situ.

And finally, I'm not here to try and convince anyone that this is a ufo but I personally am totally and absolutely convinced by what I'm seeing in these images. If you're not, then that's just unfortunate but I tried ... and by all means show me better proof if you have it.

"THE US MILITARY IS IN POSSESION OF ADVANCED DISK TECHNOLOGY"




posted on Jun, 25 2009 @ 01:54 AM
link   
if its known to be human how can one call it a UFO?

im pretty sure if we had some top secret "ufo" tech crash in the desert it wouldve been recovered. circles in the desert dont equal ufos.


And besides the govt. developed glying saucers decades ago that couldnt fly worth a damn. this wouldnt be a "finally" type deal



[edit on 25-6-2009 by ELECTRICkoolaidZOMBIEtest]



posted on Jun, 25 2009 @ 02:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by ELECTRICkoolaidZOMBIEtest
if its known to be human how can one call it a UFO?

im pretty sure if we had some top secret "ufo" tech crash in the desert it wouldve been recovered. circles in the desert dont equal ufos.


And besides the govt. developed glying saucers decades ago that couldnt fly worth a damn. this wouldnt be a "finally" type deal



[edit on 25-6-2009 by ELECTRICkoolaidZOMBIEtest]


The term ufo inherently refers to an "unidentified" device ... now to me a device, even if human constructed, that I have never seen before certainly falls into the category of unidentified.

And it most certainly is NOT just a "circle in the desert" as there are too many clearly artificial structures on the device. Just looking at the images makes it obvious it is an artificially constructed device.

So you're absolutely certain and that you know for a fact that a crashed device WOULD be recovered ? It's not possible that there was a VALID reason to leave it in place ?



posted on Jun, 25 2009 @ 02:34 AM
link   
OMG! a giant KIWI!

i dont think you can falt out call whatever that is a kiwi...cough... i meant UFO.

im sure someone here will give a good comparison as to what that may be, but i doesn't look like a UFO other than its shape.

[edit on 25-6-2009 by phi1618]



posted on Jun, 25 2009 @ 04:16 AM
link   
Hi there and thanks for sharing


To be honest you are pissing in the wind and set yourself nicely and sighted in for skeptic fodder.

No doubt its a strata anomaly etc or some natural oil pool, Dig site I can go on and on.

Pulling stuff of google earth is a hazard even though you think its a UFO.

Just be warned ATS can be a cold and lonely place if you post BS.




[edit on 043030p://f39Thursday by Bob Down Under]



posted on Jun, 25 2009 @ 04:36 AM
link   
please tell us how long you think it has been there :

months

years

decades

centuries ?

because looking at your alleged ` impact crater ` - i see no sign of ejecta or upheaval - all the ground looks to be uniform - and consistant with a natural geological formation

further - plant growth patterns appear consistant both inside and outseide the feature

seems to me that you have decided that this is a " ufo " and created an explaination that matches visible features to your hypothisis

you need to get out moore



posted on Jun, 25 2009 @ 05:29 AM
link   
good find and I must say you have spent a lot of time on this.well done.

To me this is just my input from what I have seen before it appears to be an old metal mine or mineral, and what we are seeing is contaminate water in the quarry basin .

hope I am wrong .just my thoughts.



posted on Jun, 25 2009 @ 05:48 AM
link   
reply to post by zetabeam
 


Would love to believe your analysis.

No doubts about the government having such craft etc. etc. etc. No doubts at all. 0.0000%.

However, these pics look like a swampy, moss lined, covered sink-hole.



posted on Jun, 25 2009 @ 05:57 AM
link   
I doubt that is a crashed saucer man made or not if it were it would of been escorted with a crash retrieval team or camouflaged in minutes, i think it is more likely some kind of natural pool or tar pit. sorry as you have gone to a fair length on ya theory



posted on Jun, 25 2009 @ 06:04 AM
link   
I had noticed this when you first posted it within of my own threads. The only issue i have with this image is:

A: Its green, Classified or Ufo's have a metallic (color).

If you are using google earth perhaps you can use the history button to determine if and when it existed prior to what you have found.


Peace.



posted on Jun, 25 2009 @ 07:29 AM
link   
I know there's alien life elsewhere in the Universe. I've seen UFOs. I'm a skeptical believer, alot of the time, and open-minded the majority of the time. But this stuff you've posted, is just the product of someone with too much time on their hands and an overactive imagination. And this stuff is the kind of stuff that damages the credibility of evidence and photographs that might actually be showing something of meaningful value.



posted on Jun, 26 2009 @ 04:41 AM
link   
Somehow i suspect he is making fun of all the "moon base"and crashed ufo photos. By putting up a photo that is obviously nothing really to spectacular and by attempting to make it seem so.



posted on Jun, 26 2009 @ 05:45 AM
link   
reply to post by National_Insecurity
 

I think you may be right.

I suspect he is having us all on!





posted on Jun, 27 2009 @ 11:05 AM
link   
reply to post by zetabeam
 




Below you'll find a series of images of a disk/saucer shaped device located on the ground within a heavily US military controlled area.


I have several questions.

1) What is the source of your pictures?
2) Where is the location?
3) Coordinates please?
4) Name of the Military Base if you can't at least provide that.

Stating that it's at a US Military Base isn't sufficient. Please be more exact.



posted on Jun, 27 2009 @ 12:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by ocker
good find and I must say you have spent a lot of time on this.well done.

To me this is just my input from what I have seen before it appears to be an old metal mine or mineral, and what we are seeing is contaminate water in the quarry basin .

hope I am wrong .just my thoughts.


I agree with ocker. You have found some interesting photos and obviously spent a lot of time on this.

I would agree the shape of the enlarged area is not unlike an impact crater. While the shape of the green area may bear a slight resemblance to a crashed saucer, due to the color it looks more like a mine or something, I see a discolored area roughly circular in shape but don't necessarily interpret that circular area as an object. I'm not sure that it isn't an object, but I'm reasonably confident the larger green shape is not. There could be an object in the black area in the middle but because it's black we can't tell. Or it could be a crashed manmade craft, or meteor that did form an impact crater and the colors we see are the result of metallic contamination in the surrounding soil. If it did form a shallow crater, then rain could distribute such contamination is a roughly circular shape the size of the crater.

Look at the very last photo in your opening post. If the photos you are looking at are jpegs there is some blurring of detail caused by the compression process. There can also be photographic errors in an uncompressed image due to atmospheric turbulence, etc, so it's not a good idea to point to an exceptionally fuzzy area of the photo that's blurred and try to interpret what it is, like that "ray" at the left you pointed a dozen blue arrows at, that looks like a fuzzy part of the photo, and that's how I would interpret it. It's fuzzier than the surrounding areas, probably not because anything special is there but because the image we are looking at is an imperfect photographic reproduction. I do see a central dark "area" though can see no "structure" to it, nor do I see the 2 towerlike structures in the area you mentioned, what I see are dark pixels that could be dark for a number of reasons, but towers would not be on my list of candidates for those reasons.

In summary, it is an interesting photograph, and I'm not sure what it is, but I'm pretty sure it's not a disc, though I can see a slight disc resemblance in the shape. I think you're reading way more into it than is there.

And yes the coordinates would be nice, maybe we can do some research and tell you what it is if you provide those.



posted on Jun, 27 2009 @ 12:35 PM
link   
Great find, zetabeam!! Star & Flag.



posted on Jun, 27 2009 @ 01:07 PM
link   
its threads like theses that make this forum what it is now. there was a time this place was credible...
on the other hand, you can now get FREE mental evaluation at your local free-clinic.
[sarcasm]great find, S&F [/sarcasm]



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join