It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Plus it'll only open minds
Originally posted by jimmyx
also has a man ever watched a hot woman eat a ice cream cone and NOT got...uhhmm....aroused?
Originally posted by Totakeke
It's inappropriate ("Mommy, what is that lady doing?")
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by tamusan
Ya know, I think it would make more men mad too, lol.
7 inches?
Yeah, right...
Does 'where's the beef' come to mind ladies? (Oh geesh, now look, they've got me doing it.)
But - I agree, if commercials are not aimed at a 4th grade education and completely ridiculous then they're full of s.e.x, (which wouldn't be so bad if it then it wasn't aimed at 12 year old boys).
Too bad I'd still give anything for a burger, lol.
Originally posted by Totakeke
Um, how exactly do you think children are conceived?
but that does not mean they should be censored.
Burger King’s advertising recipe has long relied on more than a cup of controversy, it’s the base ingredient. But, have we entered an era where advertising doesn’t simply equal attention?
Provoking just to poke was once a sound advertising strategy. But in an era where a multi-million dollar campaign can crumble under the powerful consumer pressure of Twitter, YouTube, or any of the growing number of consumer mouthpieces, is inspiring ire still the correct choice for a campaign?
"I've seen a lot of sexual innuendo ads and this is about the worst, especially for something as mainstream as Burger King," Duffy told FOXNews.com. "I was a little repulsed by it. It's really misogynistic to women and it's also unappetizing."