Big Fat Lie: Overeating is a symptom, not the cause, of Obesity!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 28 times


reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 08:43 AM by FrankDux
reply to post by DevolutionEvolvd



If this guy has it figured out, why does he have a gut?


reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 09:14 AM by Darth Lumina
Originally posted by pieman
reply to
post by Darth Lumina




I didn't say the discussion was about whether or not I liked fat people, I gave my opinion on the matter and if you don't like it then that's your problem, which I don't care. I'm just saying that any over fat person who looks into this will use it as an excuse to not try and change their habits. That is what my issue is, you are the one making it an issue against me. If you want some constructive advice, I would say get a life and quit being so sensitive to opinions that don't flow with yours.


reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 09:22 AM by Darth Lumina
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
I've always heard that some forms of obesity are caused by chemical imbalances in the brain. When you eat, chemicals signal your brain to let you know that you're full and should stop eating. Some people don't receive these signals properly and eat past the point that they are full without feeling discomfort. And therefore become obese.

I've seen it happen, I don't understand how some people can eat plates and plates of food without feeling full or even ill. I can't eat past when I'm full, it's physically impossible for me.


It has a lot to do with either metabolism or your size. When I gained a lot of weight, I had been able to eat quite a bit more than I was when I was originally lean, but once I cleaned up my diet and started exercising, I didn't require as much food. Plus, by eating that much all the time, you make your body believe that you need all that food, but all you're doing is satisfying your taste. You have to be able to be aware of the difference between being actually hungry and your taste buds wanting to be satisfied. However, if you are an athlete, you would need more than the average person because of the muscle tissue damage you have done, and the depletion of other nutrients you lost during your workout, practice, etc. However, obviously athletes or anyone who is a workout fanatic puts better food in their bodies than the obese person cramming all that junk down their throats.



reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 10:03 AM by pieman
reply to post by Darth Lumina



i have no issue with your opinion, it's the way it was stated, "fat little hands" and all that. just stupidity and ignorance, i don't like to let that stuff pass.

considering switching to a low carb diet takes more of an effort than a straight forward calorie controlled diet, i don't see how this could be used as an excuse for anything.


reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 10:19 AM by DevolutionEvolvd
reply to post by pieman



Thanks! One of my other threads addresses the issue of fat intake and it's supposed effects on heart disease. Taubes talks about this in his book but the lecture was cut short so he didn't have time do get into it.

This thread might help you out. The lipid hypothesis is bogus. There is no evidence that shows eating fat increases cholesterol which causes heart disease.

-Dev


reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 10:31 AM by DevolutionEvolvd
reply to post by FrankDux



My gawd. You, along with so many others, haven't taken the time to watch the damn video. I see you and others posting away non-sense and it's sickening. This is a thread to promote intelligent discussion about facts on the issue of obesity and fat gain, not your opinions. Saying what you believe and then saying that what you believe is true are two different things.

You're personal stories are not case studies and they are not evidence to support a rebuttal to the claims that are made by Gary Taubes.

If you're not going to take the time to watch the video or understand what his claims are, then please don't post in opposition with baseless opinions.



-Dev


reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 11:02 AM by Nexus-6
reply to post by activeSeven




Just wanted to add this article from the BBC (circa 2005) to the discussion. BBC growing obesity problem Check out the difference in height and weight of the average British female from 50 years ago to the present. Clearly diet is responsible for the increase in height and weight and not some sudden onset of a heretofore unknown hormonal imbalance. Also, look at the obesity problem broken down by country and notice that the UK and the US have the largest populations of obese people. Unless the US and UK just happen to have larger populations with hormonal imbalances, I think the most sensible logical inference is that the obesity problem is the result of what most of us know: diet and a sedentary lifestyle.

Most of the Asian nations, where they eat more frequent and smaller meals, do not have nearly the obesity epidemic of the US and UK. Same goes for Europe, where I believe they consume far less per meal (examples are of a US 'small' soda being the size of a medium or large in many of these countries), and I'm also going to hazard a guess that they eat less processed and more fresh foods.

Again, to me and I think to many, it's clear that the obesity epidemic is a factor of (1) what you eat, (2) how much you eat and (3) how active or inactive you are. Of course there are some people with thyroid problems, etc. but I sometimes wonder if the people that blame those problems as the cause of the obesity epidemic might not be putting the cart before the horse. Rather, many of those problems can be corrected with dietary changes.

The reason, IMO, the obesity epidemic has been growing worse over the last 30 years is b/c people eat too much processed foods, too much food in general, and with the advent of computers we have been morphing more and more into a sedentary culture where our jobs require us to sit 8 hours per day.

Anecdotal evidence: I have a friend that lives in Thailand. They eat lots of small meals throughout the day and do not eat nearly the amount of proccessed and fast foods that we in the West do. Obesity is not an epidemic there. Am I to believe it has nothing to do with their diets and activity levels and is merely a product of hormones??? Nonsense.


reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 12:14 PM by TravelerintheDark
Great stuff in the OP.

And horrible stuff from some others who simply wish to relegate anyone overweight to being selfish, gluttonous and lazy. The demonization of the overweight is a grotesque propaganda by a system that not only wants to make us fat, but to then mortify us for being so. Now the overweight have become a target of selective segregation being blamed for societies ills.

Fact: Some people are 'lazy' (ie they are not very physically active).

Fact: Some people eat 'bad' food. But in either fact not everyone who is lazy and eats badly is overweight.

A friend of mine who was slightly underweight drove cars for a living and lived on fast food.

I grew up on a 'welfare' diet in the '80's. Don't know what a welfare diet is (or was before fast food became so grossly cheap)? Well, I can tell you that it did not include 'fast food' or much junk food. It did maintain a high level of what were then cheap foods such as bread, potatoes, rice, cereal and other carbohydrates which for the ill-informed are nothing more than concentrated sugars.

What it did not include were many foods high in protein, such as meat, which are more expensive.

Guess what? I was absurdly overweight. I still am overweight despite maintaining a caloric intake well below the recommended 2000 calorie diet.

Wonder what is in a 'fast food' hamburger that makes it 100% Grade A beef? Filler. Not meat. The standards dropped, the fillers increased, the food became cheaper and people got fatter.

Is it the potatoes the french fries are made from or the 'lean' vegetable oil they're fried in that make you fat? Not to mention the added sugar that makes those McD's fries so distinct and tasty.

The question of why people overeat is a matter of nutrition. Ever notice how easy it is to eat a large bag of potato chips? Try eating the equivalent weight in meat. And notice the difference in feeling full. What's the difference in nutritional value of potato chips over meat? Huge.

How about the lazy issue. Try drinking an 'energy' drink and see how long you can sit still. More 'energy' equals more movement, not less. Energy motivates. A lack of energy stagnates. Why aren't the people who eat more doing more and therefore not fat?

Get it?

No, probably not. It's too easy to tow the government line that instigates hatred and discontent.

In closing, I'm not saying there is only one cause for obesity, and emotional and psychological factors play a role for certain as well as a build-up of toxic material in the digestive tract.

What I am saying though is that the bottom line, the FDA recommended guidelines for nutrition, is a farce at best and at worst a conspiracy to create a nation of complacent, overweight consumers lacking the nutrition and subsequent energy of good nutrition to want to do anything more than sit and watch TV which perpetuates the consumer model.


reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 12:17 PM by Darth Lumina
Originally posted by pieman
reply to
post by Darth Lumina



i have no issue with your opinion, it's the way it was stated, "fat little hands" and all that. just stupidity and ignorance, i don't like to let that stuff pass.

considering switching to a low carb diet takes more of an effort than a straight forward calorie controlled diet, i don't see how this could be used as an excuse for anything.


In other words, you do have an issue with my opinion because my statement obviously reflects it now doesn't it? To you my statement "fat little hands" might have been stupid and ignorant, but it is neither, I'm simply stating a fact. Funny part is, I wasn't even trying to insult anyone or stir anything up, you are the only one making an issue about it with me, I simply made a statement. So what if i said skinny little hands refering to a thin person, is that ignorant and stupid too? No just like the fat hands comment, it's a statement of fact. As you might have noticed, I don't give a damn about PC, if someone's feelings are hurt by comments, then they should just lock themselves in a room and avoid all contact with the outside world. Obviously, you don't understand what I'm talking about as far as excuses. All someone will see is the headline and nothing else, "Overeating is a symptom, not the cause, of Obesity!" they will assume that gives them the ok to keep eating because the food isn't the cause, they won't even bother with the adivces that are given.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



First Heartless Man - You Don\'t Really Need A Heart or A Pulse
  Posted 7 days ago with 51 member flags
Doctor Uses Coconut Oil to Reverse Husband\'s Alzheimer\'s Disease
  Posted 12 days ago with 28 member flags
A brief look at water fluoridation and the insanity of it
  Posted 10 days ago with 28 member flags
Brains of Addicts Are Inherently Abnormal
  Posted 6 days ago with 20 member flags
FDA say body is a drug and has the right to regulate it!
  Posted 10 days ago with 18 member flags
MPD/DID and Quantum Psychiatry
  Posted 13 days ago with 12 member flags

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 17 hours ago, 25 flags
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 15 hours ago, 25 flags
My Brain = about to explode
  Member Art, Posted 7 hours ago, 22 flags
ATS's Gutter-rats and the 90+ intro thread
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 21 flags
Amazing French Indigo Girl in Africa (Tippi)
  Survival, Posted 6 hours ago, 14 flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 17 hours ago, 128 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 15 hours ago, 101 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 12 hours ago, 65 replies
I saw a cat turn into a bag..
  The Gray Area, Posted 15 hours ago, 38 replies