Originally posted by warrenb
This is huge and appears to squish the modern theory that agriculture began a meer 10,000 years ago.
Agriculture was developed at least 10,000 years ago..
en.wikipedia.org...
How can you have a culture with granaries before agriculture was developed?
Our ancestors were alot smarter than we give them credit for.
Yet more evidence that our history is not as we are lead to believe...
[edit on 24-6-2009 by warrenb]
The article said they found wild barley ("wild" being the key word). This only proves they were storing grain -- not cultivating.
...and of course they were smart -- they were
modern humans just like us. They had virtually the same brain we have today, therefore they were
just as smart as us and just as capable of problem-solving and decision-making.
The one advantage we have over them is our written language. We use our written language to pass our knowledge from one generation to the next to
allow that next generation to "build upon" the past generation's knowledge. They may have had some manner of record-keeping, but their knowledge
base was small. Our knowledge base is about 5000 years. That's what gives us an advantage over them -- not our brains.
Intelligence and knowledge are two totally different things. So, it may be true that we have more "knowledge" than they did, were are not any more
intelligent.
Scientists and anthropologists would not dispute the intelligence of people 10,000 or 20,000 years ago -- mostly because those people are exactly the
same as us. They were modern humans who were equally intelligent as we are today. Mainstream anthropologists would agree with that idea.
This does not change the "history of humans" as much as you seem to be implying.
[edit on 6/24/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]