It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

the New equator, video

page: 1
2
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 09:11 AM
link   


'' This video illustrates approximately where the new equator will be located after Earth's pole shift in 2012. This is based on data which indicates the pole shift will be approximately 35 degrees, placing the new North Pole at the top of Mongolia. The white icon in the middle of the video marks the line of the new equator. ''

The reason why the movie 2012 is coming is to redicule these events and any one who speaks of it.

It is one of 'the controllers' plans to get ready for the coming catastrophes.
Fema camps and fluoride to keep people asleep.

The powers that be knows what is coming and if they are to keep control, they need the populus to be ignorant and in trust of the Governments, this is how they will get you and your families to go willingly into these camps, thats why the swine and avian flu is coming hard this fall and why they have scheduled the economy collapse in such a manner that the people will se no other alternative then 'follow the good advise' from the Governments.

DHS are not going to mass slaughter 5 billion people, they know the populus will do this by them selfs when the chaos starts, it is in the human nature.




posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 09:14 AM
link   
I'm a little surprised that the graphic didn't seem to adjust topography for advancing sea levels, given than it puts Antarctica much closer to the hypothetical equator.

Interesting, though, thanks.



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 09:18 AM
link   
reply to post by argentus
 


No problem . I think people are waking up to this now, it cant be hidden much longer.

Ask your self, how many people in this field of reshears have you heard saying that 2009 is the Year of Contact or Year of astronomy and such?

Convenient with an year of astronomy wich they suposedly find all this stuff..




posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 09:25 AM
link   
I would think that a potential pole shift could happen in any direction, thus there are many possible locations for the future equator. So why did the makers of this video pick that specific location for the new poles/equator?

Can you show me that data that says the poles will shift 35 degrees in the specific direction needed to make this the new equator?

(by the way -- I don't believe in the 2012 pole shift. I thought I should tell you that up front.)


EDIT TO ADD: Hi argentus. I'm not stalking you, really...it just seems we ended up at the same thread again by coincidence
. Nice to see you here.

[edit on 6/24/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 09:31 AM
link   
reply to post by ChemBreather
 


hi ChemBreather
can you provide sources to your statements?
It would be great to back them up with hard data and feeds the mind of info nuts like myself.




posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 09:37 AM
link   
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
 


I cant give you that since I didnt make the video.
But I just watches this 16 part series on the subject, and he say it is based on data from recent research and the already displacement of the poles..

The poles are moving now, when , as I understand it, the north and south magnetic poles are close enough together, earth loses its stability.

One rather must watch videos where he explains it from start to finish..
And just flat out deny any hint towards any of these events is imo is out of total denial or ignorance and one should start researching one self rather than asking for handouts of the truth, cuase that will not make any sence as one do not get the middle parts of 'why' and 'how' can it happen.

I am not calling any one here any thing, it is just an general statement..




posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 09:42 AM
link   
reply to post by warrenb
 


Im surprised you havent heard about the Fluoride hazards / conspiracy without me having to smack down links to 30 pages of data about it !!

its like Chemtrails, they are there and I dont even wanna bother arguing about it, Ive seen them and dont care what others believe, it is not on my head..
same with fluoride, I havnt used it for a year soon and I no longer have icing in my teeth, so for me it seems true..


What sources do you want?? I slap some links here !!



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 09:49 AM
link   
reply to post by ChemBreather
 


Sorry I was not specific, this is what I was referring to:

This is based on data which indicates the pole shift will be approximately 35 degrees, placing the new North Pole at the top of Mongolia. The white icon in the middle of the video marks the line of the new equator.


I am fully aware of the dangers of fluoride, thank you for your concern.




posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 09:55 AM
link   
Interesting choice of shift. If this is correct I will be living smack on the equator. Which will be quite an adjustment since I am used to 6 months of winter weather. I suppose I would look forward to this if it weren't for the north pole melting all over me when it happens.



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 09:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by warrenb
reply to post by ChemBreather
 


Sorry I was not specific, this is what I was referring to:

This is based on data which indicates the pole shift will be approximately 35 degrees, placing the new North Pole at the top of Mongolia. The white icon in the middle of the video marks the line of the new equator.


I am fully aware of the dangers of fluoride, thank you for your concern.


You are welcome, that is the quote from the youtube, you must realize that this is a huge subject, it just dont have to do with earth tipping over, it has to do with the Sun and the Milkyway and how all that combined creates these changes, worsen weather, more earthquakes and tsunamies.

I do not know how much you know of the topic, but scientists say they are surprized by things work when they for decades has said: 'This we know, we are scientists' , and they are taken by surprize over and over..



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 10:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by ChemBreather

The reason why the movie 2012 is coming is to redicule these events and any one who speaks of it.


Not really.

The idea of earth crust displacement was disproven over 50 years ago.

The idea of the entire planet somehow flipping over so it has a completely different axial tilt is complete fantasy - but if by change it did happen then it's likely not only all life on the planet would be destroyed but the oceans and atmosphere as well. The nearest safe place to be would be Mars*.

It's a lot more likely that a mutant space goat will eat the sun. A lot, lot, lot more likely.

All aboard the B Ark




* edit: unless of course it's Mars which impacts Earth to cause the axial tilt. In which case there will be no more Mars. But in a billion years time we might have another big Moon.

[edit on 24-6-2009 by Essan]



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 10:03 AM
link   
reply to post by ChemBreather
 


Not sure I believe in the pole shift but I do think there is a lot of evidence that Antartica was a lot warmer and ice free more recently than scientists say it was.

I have mixed feelings about this. First it would mean if it's correct that my land will be much warmer and give better yields because of the warmer weather. Secondly I'm thinking that I like my cool summers and don't want a hotter summer. Being at a higher altitude and given the changes in water elevation I may suddenly have the next beach front property.



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 10:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by exile1981
reply to post by ChemBreather
 


Not sure I believe in the pole shift but I do think there is a lot of evidence that Antartica was a lot warmer and ice free more recently than scientists say it was.


Well, the idea of the coastal fringe being temperate around 4,000,000 years ago is still disputed. There is actually more evidence that I'm a 19 mile high solid gold statue of a 7 legged space rabbit than there is that Antarctica has been warmer than today within recent geological time. Though there's plenty of evidence it has been colder.

As an aside, the last seabed cores provide excellent corroboration with Antarctic ice cores for global temperature changes over the past 500,000 years.



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 10:15 AM
link   
reply to post by PowerSlave
 


Lets take your avatar, Pharaos of ancient egypt.

let my very short connect it to 2012, just the raw basics..

Maintain population under 500 Million..Hmm
Oh yea, the Georgia Guidstones, R.C. Christian , soo what you think?

The Rosicrucian Order


Pharaoh Thutmose III, who ruled Egypt from 1500 to 1447 B.C., organized the first esoteric school of initiates founded upon principles and methods similar to those perpetuated today by the Rosi­crucian Order, AMORC. Decades later Pharaoh Amenhotep IV was initiated into the secret school. This most enlightened
pharaoh—history’s first monotheist—was so inspired by the mystery teachings that he gave a completely new direction to Egypt’s religion and philosophy. He established a religion which recognized the Aton, the solar disk, as being the symbol of the sole deity—the foundation of life itself, the symbol of Light, Truth, and Joy—and changed his name to Akhnaton to reflect these new ideas. And although the earlier religion was later reestablished, the mystical idea was put forth in human consciousness, and its flame never died.


Do you see how the mark of the ancients are still with us even to day, and they must know something since they put up those stones, wouldnt you agree?



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 10:16 AM
link   
The lack of scientific literacy in the World today is stunning....simply, stunning.

I'm not saying it's impossible for the orientation of the Earth's axis in relation to the rest of the Solar System to change (or, more correctly, in relation to the direction of its orbit). Looking at Neptune, for example, something happened there, at some time in the distant past.

BUT, it simply cannot happen to Earth, as described by the video posted in the OP, in just three years!! Unless you wish to deny the Laws of Physics, and Newton, in which case you'd be in a very small club.

There is this pesky little fact of rotational motion known as angular momentum. Note the word momentum. The incredible mass of the Earth is in motion, rotating about what we call the axis. That axis happens to be angled at about 26 degrees relative to the Earth's motion in orbit. The Earth will continue to rotate around this imaginary line, however OVER TIME it is possible that the angle of this line, relative to the motion in orbit, could alter. But, we're talking millions, possibly billions of years for something like that to happen (although, I suppose a very, very large body impacting the Earth could impart a precessional vector influence and cause a more rapid change of "tilt", but then it would wipe out all life anyways...)

I think what the ill-informed are confusing, here, is the possible shifting of the magnetic poles. Geological evidence in ancient strata show indications that this has happened repeatedly over the course of Earth's existence. No one knows for certain, how rapidly it occurs, or even why, exactly. It is a fact that the 'True" poles and the 'Magnetic' poles do not align -- they are off by a few hundred miles -- but as with the True North/South, the Magnetic 'poles' are exactly 180 degrees opposite. They can never be anything but.

Of course, any dramatic changes in the Magnetic pole alignment would be immediately noted by ships, airplanes, GPS, even the casual hiker in the woods. It would NOT go unnoticed, and would be BIG NEWS!

If you wish to educate yourselves further into the ins and outs of navigation on the Earth's surface, and how the above facts inter-connect, just search the terms 'magnetic north', 'true north' and 'variation'. That should get you started.



[edit on 6/24/0909 by weedwhacker]



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 10:34 AM
link   
If the axial tilt changes and we have a new equator, does that mean Ecuador will have to change it's name?



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 10:44 AM
link   
reply to post by weedwhacker
 


Im not reading up on old material , that is what is been wrong all along..

If the evidence change, so must the theory... ( SCI , Gill Grissom )


Some newer studies show


Scientists Surprised

The size of the breach shocked researchers. "We've seen things like this before," says Li's colleague Jimmy Raeder, "but never on such a large scale. The entire day-side of the magnetosphere was open to the solar wind.

This is changing our understanding of the universe. Space physicists have long believed that holes in Earth's magnetosphere open only in response to solar magnetic fields that point south. The great breach of June 2007, however, opened in response to a solar magnetic field that pointed north.

To the lay person, this may sound like a quibble, but to a space physicist, it is almost seismic. It means that something is happening out there that they didn't predict and that is what has them frightened.

Unexpected Shield Drop

Here is where the scientific understanding our how magnetic field is changing: What is understood today in the scientific community is that the solar wind presses against the Earth's magnetosphere almost directly above the equator where our planet's magnetic field points north. Scientists previously believed that if a bundle of solar magnetism came along, and points north, too, the two fields should reinforce one another strengthening Earth's magnetic defenses and slamming the door shut on the solar wind. In the language of space physics, a north-pointing solar magnetic field is called a "northern IMF" and it is synonymous with shields up.

The big suprise is that when a northern IMF came along, the shields went down. This is completely overturning many scientists understanding of things. As Researchers investigated the tear in the magnetic field, they discovered that twenty times more solar wind passed into the Earth's protective shield when the magnetic fields were aligned. Northern IMF events don't actually trigger geomagnetic storms, notes Raeder, but they do set the stage for storms by loading the magnetosphere with plasma. A loaded magnetosphere is primed for auroras, power outages, and other disturbances that can result when a CME (coronal mass ejection) hits.

This means the impact of sloar flares are twenty times as strong with the magnetic lines are aligned. Earth's and the sun's magnetic fields will be in sync at the solar cycle's peak, expected in 2012. This will cause an influx of solar particles. What the scientists didn’t discuss is the impact on the human bioelectrical system.

The earth's magnetic field impacts climate

The earth's climate has been significantly affected by the planet's magnetic field, according to a Danish study published in January 2009 that could challenge the notion that human emissions are responsible for global warming.

"Our results show a strong correlation between the strength of the earth's magnetic field and the amount of precipitation in the tropics," one of the two Danish geophysicists behind the study, Mads Faurschou Knudsen of the geology department at Aarhus University in western Denmark, told the Videnskab journal.

The results of the study, which has also been published in US scientific journal Geology, lend support to a controversial theory published a decade ago by Danish astrophysicist Henrik Svensmark, who claimed the climate was highly influenced by galactic cosmic ray (GCR) particles penetrating the earth's atmosphere.


Sooo, this 'experts' get taken by surprize about alot of things lately, and I'm supposed to believe every word they say



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 11:03 AM
link   
reply to post by weedwhacker
 


Agreed. And to add a visual...

If it were somehow true that the crust of the earth could tip 35 degrees in relation to the solar plain, and let's say this transition happened over a period of 3 years. According to my math, that puts the transition at 27 PER MINUTE! The friction caused by moving the entire crust of the earth at the rate of 27 feet per minute continuously for 3 years would likely be enough to melt the entire surface of the earth, and that's assuming a uniform movement, which is unlikely given the nature of plate-techtonics.

I am certainly not saying that this is not possible. I just don't think that it would happen in a short span of time like 3 years and certainly not overnight. More likely any sort of pole shift would be an electro-magnetic pole shift, leaving the geographical position of the earth in place.



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 11:23 AM
link   
reply to post by ChemBreather
 



Excerpt from your 'external source':



This means the impact of sloar flares are twenty times as strong with the magnetic lines are aligned. Earth's and the sun's magnetic fields will be in sync at the solar cycle's peak, expected in 2012. This will cause an influx of solar particles. What the scientists didn’t discuss is the impact on the human bioelectrical system.


I added the bold to indicate what a scholarly level of work this guy has achieved!!!

Anyway, you should read the entire thing. It really has nothing to do with "pole shift" or "equatorial shift" or anything from your OP, it discusses the variable nature of the Earth's magnetic field, and how it interacts with the Sun's radiation. Of course, there is still a lot to learn about all the dynamics of our magnetic field, and how it protects us. We've only had the scientific ability to do real research for about the last 50 years.

But, life has survived thus far, and as the article correctly pointed out, the magnetic field has shifted countless times. And, when they say they were surprised at how 'rapidly' some changes occur, they mean in relation to geologic time periods. Certainly, too, those 'rapid' changes could easily change back, or just be a slight waver. No one really knows, and worrying about it isn't going to affect it.

Best thing is to continue to study. It may affect our power grids, in certain parts of the World...inconvenient, but hardly dangerous. And, we'll learn more how to harden those grids against future anomalies.

Could affect crops, or even Humans directly (increased Solar radiation) but droughts and famine happen due to other forces, weather patterns, pests, etc., and Humans already have a lot of dangers in our natural environment....so.....?



[edit on 6/24/0909 by weedwhacker]



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 12:06 PM
link   
reply to post by ChemBreather
 


I didn't watch the entire 16 part video, but I watched the part you posted (part 8 of 16).

His explanation for the existence of bands of iron oxide and iron oxide-rich red soil in many parts of the world is NOT scientifically sound. They were not deposited there by volcanoes.

The iron was deposited 2.5 billion to 3 billion years ago in ancient seas. Those ancient seas were iron-rich, but not iron-oxide rich (iron oxide is the red iron). This is because before 2.5 billion years ago, the seas and the atmosphere had very little free oxygen. The atmosphere was mostly CO2 and methane -- and the oceans contained little or no dissolved free oxygen. But then, algae life appeared in the oceans -- algae that fed on CO2 and then expelled oxygen into the water and into the air. Over millions of years, this oxygen reacted with the large amount of iron dissolved in the oceans and created iron oxide. That iron oxide was deposited on the ancient ocean floors and that is the the origin of most of red soil we see today.

Also, his claim that geologists cannot explain how the white cliffs of Dover formed is wrong. Geologists have a good idea how they were formed -- and they weren't thrust up out of the water by a sudden reversal of Earth's rotation as the presenter claims in the video. The cliffs are there simply because the water of the channel has eroded the land away -- a process still happening today. Pieces of the cliffs often fall into the channel below.

His theory that sudden reversals in the Earth's rotation is the cause for iron oxide to be found all over the earth and is the cause for some geological formations is simplistic and ignores so much other evidence for the cause of these processes.



[edit on 6/24/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]



new topics

top topics



 
2
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join