reply to post by kilcoo316
For once you and I agree on something. The Osprey seems a bit of a dog and it should have been canceled a long time ago.
Operational experience in Somolia, Serbia, and the both Gulf Wars has shown that attack chopters are no match for an RPG. I shudder to think of the
USMC using them to storm beacheads.
V-22’s Iraq Performance Should Prompt Program Review, GAO Says
June 23 (Bloomberg) -- The V-22 Osprey’s performance during its 19 months in Iraq was substandard and the Pentagon should review whether the
aircraft’s cost and reliability merit continuing the program, according to congressional auditors.
The tilt-rotor plane’s components wear out too soon, making it too costly to maintain and grounded too much of the time, the U.S. Government
Accountability Office said.
The Defense Department has spent $28 billion on the aircraft developed and built by Textron Inc. and Boeing Co. and has bought 206 planes to date. It
plans to spend $25 billion more on upgrades and the purchase of the remaining 252 planes in the 458-aircraft program for the Marine Corps and Air
Force Special Operations Command.
Given the “significant funding needs” to complete the program, “now is a good time to consider the return on this investment as well as other,
less costly alternatives that can fill the current requirement,” the watchdog agency said.
www.bloomberg.com...
93 million per copy

That alone should kill it. Its almost as bad as the new presidential chopter.
Adding to problems outlined by GAO, V-22 costs have risen sharply above initial projections. In 1996, the plan was to build nearly 1,000 of them in 10
years at $37.7 million each. Now, the plan is for fewer than 500 at $93.4 million apiece -- a procurement unit cost jump of 148 percent, GAO said.
www.reuters.com...
[edit on 6/26/09 by FredT]